Re: Freerunner and Wayland

2011-07-13 Thread Thomas White
On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:05:02 +0100 Neil Jerram neiljer...@gmail.com wrote: Just wondering... is it at all feasible, in the nearish future, for Wayland to run on the Freerunner? I mean directly on KMS, not as an X client. Would there be any advantage to that, compared to the current X usage?

Re: Freerunner and Wayland

2011-07-13 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Tom, Thanks for your answer... On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White t...@bitwiz.org.uk wrote: acceleration pathways.  A lot of the performance difficulties with the X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server can't possibly know enough about what the client wants to

Re: Freerunner and Wayland

2011-07-13 Thread Al Johnson
On Wednesday 13 July 2011, Neil Jerram wrote: Hi Tom, Thanks for your answer... On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White t...@bitwiz.org.uk wrote: acceleration pathways. A lot of the performance difficulties with the X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server can't

Freerunner and Wayland

2011-07-07 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi there, Just wondering... is it at all feasible, in the nearish future, for Wayland to run on the Freerunner? I mean directly on KMS, not as an X client. Would there be any advantage to that, compared to the current X usage? I'm imagining it might perform better, but I don't really know.