On Thu, 7 Jul 2011 18:05:02 +0100
Neil Jerram neiljer...@gmail.com wrote:
Just wondering... is it at all feasible, in the nearish future, for
Wayland to run on the Freerunner? I mean directly on KMS, not as an X
client.
Would there be any advantage to that, compared to the current X usage?
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your answer...
On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White t...@bitwiz.org.uk wrote:
acceleration pathways. A lot of the performance difficulties with the
X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server
can't possibly know enough about what the client wants to
On Wednesday 13 July 2011, Neil Jerram wrote:
Hi Tom,
Thanks for your answer...
On 13 July 2011 10:01, Thomas White t...@bitwiz.org.uk wrote:
acceleration pathways. A lot of the performance difficulties with the
X pathway (not just on our hardware) seem to be because the server
can't
Hi there,
Just wondering... is it at all feasible, in the nearish future, for
Wayland to run on the Freerunner? I mean directly on KMS, not as an X
client.
Would there be any advantage to that, compared to the current X usage?
I'm imagining it might perform better, but I don't really know.
4 matches
Mail list logo