Re: GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-26 Thread Rico Rommel
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011, 13:12:10 schrieb Timo Juhani Lindfors:
> Rico Rommel  writes:
> > In Debian you should simply install fso-gta02 package. It has
> > dependencies to all other needed packages.
> 
> Sounds good that it conflicts with fso-config-gta02. I always hated
> that I get the full FSO stack if I only want the udev rules..
> 
> Where are the udev rules nowadays?

They are in fso-gta02 - you get the whole stuff :)

Rico

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-26 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Rico Rommel  writes:
> In Debian you should simply install fso-gta02 package. It has dependencies to 
> all other needed packages.

Sounds good that it conflicts with fso-config-gta02. I always hated
that I get the full FSO stack if I only want the udev rules..

Where are the udev rules nowadays?



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-26 Thread Rico Rommel
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011, 09:35:59 schrieben Sie:
> Thanks Rico for your answer,
> 
> > fso-frameworkd and fso-deviced both provide org.freesmartphone.odeviced
> > interface but in fso-framworkd it's disabled by default.
> 
> If I understand well the two interfaces are not identical, i.e.
> the battery info is available at different nodes. In one case it
> is:
> 
> org.freesmartphone.odeviced \
> /org/freesmartphone/Device/PowerSupply/3 \
> org.freesmartphone.Info.GetInfo
> 
> in the other it is:
> 
> org.freesmartphone.odeviced \
> /org/freesmartphone/Device/PowerSupply/battery \
> org.freesmartphone.Device.PowerSupply.GetInfo
> 
> Is one interface preferred/deprecated/obsolete or whatever
> respect the other?
> 
> I don't understant the rationale of that duplication.

frameworkd was the first implementation of the fso-stack, fsodeviced is part of 
the second generation called cornucopia
http://wiki.freesmartphone.org/index.php/Implementations

That meens, fso-frameworkd is deprecated but not obsolete due to some modules 
still missing in cornucopia (e.g. opimd)

In the future fso-frameword will be fully replaced by cornucopia daemons.

Rico

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-26 Thread Niccolo Rigacci
Thanks Rico for your answer,

> fso-frameworkd and fso-deviced both provide org.freesmartphone.odeviced 
> interface but in fso-framworkd it's disabled by default.

If I understand well the two interfaces are not identical, i.e. 
the battery info is available at different nodes. In one case it 
is:

org.freesmartphone.odeviced \
/org/freesmartphone/Device/PowerSupply/3 \
org.freesmartphone.Info.GetInfo

in the other it is:

org.freesmartphone.odeviced \
/org/freesmartphone/Device/PowerSupply/battery \
org.freesmartphone.Device.PowerSupply.GetInfo

Is one interface preferred/deprecated/obsolete or whatever 
respect the other?

I don't understant the rationale of that duplication.

Thanks again.

-- 
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy
Tel. ufficio: 055-0118525

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-26 Thread Rico Rommel
Am Mittwoch, 26. Oktober 2011, 00:51:11 schrieb Niccolo Rigacci:
> Please help, I'm very confused!
> 
> Can someone tell me what are the differences between
> fso-frameworkd and fso-deviced packages?
> 
> What should I install on my GTA02 FreeRunner?
> 
> It seems that the DBus interface changes running one or the
> other, but they let access the same hardware.

fso-frameworkd and fso-deviced both provide org.freesmartphone.odeviced 
interface but in fso-framworkd it's disabled by default.

In Debian you should simply install fso-gta02 package. It has dependencies to 
all other needed packages.

Rico

signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


GTA02: Should I install fso-frameworkd, fso-deviced or both?

2011-10-25 Thread Niccolo Rigacci
Please help, I'm very confused!

Can someone tell me what are the differences between 
fso-frameworkd and fso-deviced packages?

What should I install on my GTA02 FreeRunner?

It seems that the DBus interface changes running one or the 
other, but they let access the same hardware.

Many thanks!


P.S. I installed Debian Sid from Debian and 
pkg-fso.alioth.debian.org.

-- 
Niccolo Rigacci
Firenze - Italy
Tel. ufficio: 055-0118525

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community