On Mon, June 16, 2008 5:14 am, Stroller wrote:
>
> I'm not sure what the big deal is with 3G.
>
> My misconception was that GSM was only "dial-up speed", but someone
> recently posted here stating otherwise. Someone debated with him over
> his terming GSM as having "ADSL speed", but if it's 2 or 3
On 15 Jun 2008, at 05:54, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> ...
> Or maybe I am just ignorant. Can you do sending
> and receiving email and so on with GSM, or is that 3G only?
GSM is fine for this.
> ...
> I'd really rather buy a Freerunner, but at the moment I'm not sure
> what
> to do. I currently h
> use webmail. Since we're saying 'low-speed IP' does that mean SSH would
> be possible?
depends on your use of ssh -- tunneling X will probably be a bad idea
(maybe vnc or so is an alternative?), but everything that works on the
commandline should be reasonable fast.
> Would providers tend t
Hi.
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 18:55 +1000, NeilBrown wrote:
> On Sun, June 15, 2008 2:54 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> >I'd like
> > to replace them both by one thing, and I want that one thing to be Linux
> > based and open source. At th
On 2008-06-15 14:54:27 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> I want it to be useful for a long time. 3G seems to me ignorant mind
> to fit that bill better than GSM. (They've just switched off CDMA here
> in Aussie; I don't know anything for certain, but assume that it won't
> be too many years before G
On Sun, June 15, 2008 2:54 pm, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
>I'd like
> to replace them both by one thing, and I want that one thing to be Linux
> based and open source. At the same time, though, I want it to be useful
> for a long time. 3G
On Sun, 2008-06-15 at 14:54 +1000, Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> Can you do sending and receiving email and so on with GSM, or is that 3G only?
Of course. It's only slower over GSM (GPRS).
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
Am So 15. Juni 2008 schrieb Nigel Cunningham:
> GSM goes the same way). Or maybe I am just ignorant. Can you do sending
> and receiving email and so on with GSM, or is that 3G only?
Maybe the most simple answer: iPhone(1) has NO 3G. (though I usually hate to
compare to this product).
/j
signat
Hi Robert.
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 18:41 -0700, Robert Taylor wrote:
> Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> > That's too bad. I was going to buy GTA02, but decided not to because it
> > lacks 3G. If GTA03 is going to lack it too, I guess I'd better look
> > elsewhere for something / re-evaluate how long I want
Nigel Cunningham wrote:
> That's too bad. I was going to buy GTA02, but decided not to because it
> lacks 3G. If GTA03 is going to lack it too, I guess I'd better look
> elsewhere for something / re-evaluate how long I want to wait before
> combining my organiser and phone into one.
>
> Nigel
>
>
>
Hi.
On Sat, 2008-06-14 at 01:16 +0200, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen wrote:
> On 6/12/08, Kevin Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > And I want it half the size:)
> > > A tiny, nice phone with QVGA, no
On 6/12/08, Kevin Dean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > And I want it half the size:)
> > A tiny, nice phone with QVGA, not a notebook. If you want the double size,
> > why not just buy an eeepc?
>
> As the r
On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 18:02 +0200, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> If the GTA03 get's a new case design, please consider making the
> screen twice as big!
I would like a screen maybe 10mm to 20mm or so larger, but any bigger
than that makes it too wide for a phone.
> Also, I suggest concentrating more on th
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 4:43 PM, Flemming Richter Mikkelsen
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I want it half the size:)
> A tiny, nice phone with QVGA, not a notebook. If you want the double size,
> why not just buy an eeepc?
As the resident Devil's Advocate, I agree here.
Lemme state this - I pa
I want a phone, not a tablet. -1.
Ilja O. pravi:
me wants it too
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/commu
me wants it too
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
2008/6/10 Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Ortwin Regel wrote:
>> There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
>> really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
>> (obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how messed
>> up the 02 situatio
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 9:02 AM, Ortwin Regel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
> really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
> (obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how messed
> up the 02 situat
I couldn't agree more.
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 7:02 PM, Ortwin Regel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
> really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
> (obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how m
I wonder: Might it be useful/possible to add a connector for Bug
modules to a future Openmoko phone?
On 6/10/08, Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Roland Häder wrote:
>> My suggestion here is that OpenMoko may design another phone - if the
>> market
>> asks for this:
>>
>> - An OpenMoko f
Ah, thanks for making it clear. :)
On Tuesday, 10. June 2008, Ortwin Regel wrote:
> For the record: I was talking about the gaming controls of my Tapwave
> Zodiac. I realize that this was probably not all that clear from the
> context and apologize.
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally
On 6/10/08, Robert Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ortwin Regel wrote:
> > There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
> > really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
> > (obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how messed
> > up the
Roland Häder wrote:
> My suggestion here is that OpenMoko may design another phone - if the market
> asks for this:
>
> - An OpenMoko for younger people who need the gaming controls Ortwin is
> mentioning as subject for removal.
>
> - Another OpenMoko for professionals/business/older people witho
On 10/06/2008, Ortwin Regel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>
> I think branching into multiple devices starts making sense with the
> switch to a new SoC
Trouble enough to produce one model :-)
. As it is, it looks like GTA03 is supposed to be
> the Neo camera edition.
Nope
Read mails el
For the record: I was talking about the gaming controls of my Tapwave
Zodiac. I realize that this was probably not all that clear from the
context and apologize.
I think branching into multiple devices starts making sense with the
switch to a new SoC. As it is, it looks like GTA03 is supposed to b
My suggestion here is that OpenMoko may design another phone - if the market
asks for this:
- An OpenMoko for younger people who need the gaming controls Ortwin is
mentioning as subject for removal.
- Another OpenMoko for professionals/business/older people without the gameing
controls but big
Ortwin Regel wrote:
> There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
> really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
> (obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how messed
> up the 02 situation is. I'd guess it's faster most of the time.) but
There has been all this fruitless talk about resolution. Well, what is
really limiting the Neo's screen right now is not resolution
(obviously), not speed (at least not on the GTA01, no idea how messed
up the 02 situation is. I'd guess it's faster most of the time.) but
size! If the GTA03 get's a n
28 matches
Mail list logo
