Hello,
On Nov 22, 2007 2:00 AM, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
>
> > Hello,
>
> > I'm on Ubuntu 7.10 (i386).
> > What do I need in addition to the loop module:
>
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# losetup -v /dev/loop0
> > /home/tingo/work/openmoko/qtopia-root
Torfinn Ingolfsen wrote:
> Hello,
> On Nov 16, 2007 11:55 PM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Out of interest: how does one 'uncompress' a *.jffs file?
>>
>>
>> mount it, copy the contents out.
> I'm on Ubuntu 7.10 (i386).
> What do I need in addition to the loop module:
> [EMAIL PRO
>For someone to claim to "write a C android app", what would be required
>would be for the app to communicate with the "Surface Manager" and
>display a GUI, and/or communicate with the android databases (phone
book,
>call log, whatever), and/or communicate with the device drivers (eg,
make
>a c
Also spracht Jose Manuel Ferrer Mosteiro (Fri, 16 Nov 2007 12:56:06
+0100):
> Final comment: well, it is possible
Running a C app in the emulator is almost entirely irrelevant. There's
no guarantee the emulator even resembles the final platform -- or for
that matter, that the final platform wil
" The idea is that cellphone manufacturers will be able to use the
standard, open (and Linux-based) Android platform for free, to
power their future cellphones (the first ones will be out in the
second half of next year). And, as you might imagine, the new
Google-provided mobile OS will have de
Hello,
On Nov 16, 2007 11:55 PM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Out of interest: how does one 'uncompress' a *.jffs file?
>
>
> mount it, copy the contents out.
I'm on Ubuntu 7.10 (i386).
What do I need in addition to the loop module:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# losetup -v /dev/loop0
/home/t
On Nov 17, 2007 3:04 AM, Dietz Proepper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> hank williams:
> > On Nov 14, 2007 2:55 PM, William Voorhees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> > > I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
> > > video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hop
On Friday 16 November 2007 12:29, hank williams wrote:
> On Nov 14, 2007 2:55 PM, William Voorhees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
> > video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hope that
> > google's Do No Evil slogan
I do hope and expect android to be open. That said, lets be clear
"not
open" != evil.
You got that backwards, buddy. "Not open" -> evil holds to a much
larger
extent than the inversion (for you information, that would be
"open" ->
not evil).
You know whats even more evil than "open" o
hank williams:
> On Nov 14, 2007 2:55 PM, William Voorhees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> > I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
> > video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hope that
> > google's Do No Evil slogan takes hold.
> >
> > -Will
>
> I do hope
Out of interest: how does one 'uncompress' a *.jffs file?
mount it, copy the contents out.
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
> Take a jffs image from familiar web.
> Uncompress the image in a directory.
Out of interest: how does one 'uncompress' a *.jffs file?
--
REgards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko
Yes absolutely I meant !open. And yes I agree with the rest of your
statement.
Hank
On Nov 16, 2007 8:52 AM, Attila Csipa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 16 November 2007 13:29:50 hank williams wrote:
> > Though I do know many in th open source community feel this way. I don't
> > know if
On Friday 16 November 2007 13:29:50 hank williams wrote:
> Though I do know many in th open source community feel this way. I don't
> know if this was just a slip or if it reflected your real opinions, but if
> open is evil, then most every product, device, computer, phone, chip, etc
> that we use
I'm thinking about this and ... It is possible use android emulator with
gpe or qtopia?
Emulator has an arm proccessor.
Take a jffs image from familiar web.
Uncompress the image in a directory.
Copy image to android emulator.
chroot it
run "ls"
Somebody can do it? I have not enough time to test i
On Nov 14, 2007 2:55 PM, William Voorhees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
> video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hope that
> google's Do No Evil slogan takes hold.
>
> -Will
I do hope and expect android to be op
Final comment: well, it is possible
http://groups.google.com/group/android-developers/browse_thread/thread/dffafba924e3a2e6/8a918f852b6499c2?lnk=gst&q=native+c#8a918f852b6499c2
Doug Sutherland escribió:
> Cameron wrote
>
>> Personally.. I think people should stop commenting
>>
>
> If yo
Cameron wrote
> Personally.. I think people should stop commenting
If you don't like a comment, there is a delete key.
-- Doug
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
st for OpenMoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Gphone isn't open, linux dev not possible
Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2007 13:55:48 -0600
I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hope that
goog
I wouldn't say I'm not concerned, but I'm hopeful. In one of the
video's Sergy Brin says that it will be "entirely open". I hope that
google's Do No Evil slogan takes hold.
-Will
On Nov 14, 2007 1:34 PM, Festival.Star <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah that is true but Googles saying:
>
> "Over ti
Yeah that is true but Googles saying:
"Over time, more of the code that makes up Android will be released, but
at this point, we have been concentrating on shipping an SDK that helps
application developers get started. In short: Stay tuned."
But what does "over time" mean, that can be 2 months bu
See, we all think M$ sucks and Google rocks, but we have to remember
they are still a business. If M$ wasn't doing such a poor job, then
Google may not be so highly regarded today.
OpenMoko all the way!
-Kyle
On Nov 13, 2007 9:51 PM, Doug Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah it seems li
upon further inspection it looks like your right, though I am still
hopeful based upon this entry in the FAQ.
http://code.google.com/android/kb/licensingandoss.html
Assuming that this is true, it only strengthens the case of the Neo
1973 and openmoko project. If the 850mhz issue resolved, I'll b
2007/11/14, William Voorhees <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> that's what I thought, till I found this:
>
> http://git.android.com/
>
> -WIll
>
Don't be fooled it's only the kernel sources: they have to publish
them, as required by the GPL. What about the libs sources? The VM?
Marty
__
On Wednesday 14 November 2007 05:02, Cameron Braid wrote:
> Personally.. I think people should stop commenting on how they dislike
> another toolkit.. Either use it, or don't - its your choice.
>
Perhaps that could also work for mailing lists when people don;t like what
other people decide to wri
>Currently, Android sucks big time, IMO. Google has no announced plans
>for allowing developers to write any C/C++ applications.
Well I've managed to get a native C "hello world" running under the
android emulator, so it is possible to run native C/C++ applications.
"All" we need to do is work o
Personally.. I think people should stop commenting on how they dislike
another toolkit.. Either use it, or don't - its your choice.
Both OpenMoko and Android take different approaches, which appeal to
different developers, and to me that is fantastic.
Cameron.
On Nov 14, 2007 2:23 PM, William V
that's what I thought, till I found this:
http://git.android.com/
-WIll
On Nov 13, 2007 8:51 PM, Doug Sutherland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yeah it seems like this Android is for phone companies,
> or that's google's current "spaghetti on the wall" idea.
> Even if it sticks, if they're just tr
Yeah it seems like this Android is for phone companies,
or that's google's current "spaghetti on the wall" idea.
Even if it sticks, if they're just trying to make it some
"standard" for "companies", what will that buy the
techie user? Nada. I'm finding it hard to motivate myself
to even look at
Hi, guys.
Currently, Android sucks big time, IMO. Google has no announced plans
for allowing developers to write any C/C++ applications. All you get is
their non-standard Java. I think this basically makes it just like all
the other stupid "smart" phones. There's tons of stuff we could port to
30 matches
Mail list logo
