> Maybe when I get time I'll take a freerunner up to my friends at Emu
> and see
> what ideas they come up with.
Do it! See if they'll port a few of their apps to it for us .. ;)
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@li
AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Inter-Freerunner Connectivity
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
>> supercollider or similar?
>
>
> Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunn
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 12:52 PM, Tilman Baumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Jay Vaughan wrote:
> >> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
> >> supercollider or similar?
> >
> >
> > Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
> > work, I imag
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
>> supercollider or similar?
>
>
> Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
> work, I imagine, quite well. Pair it up with some nice MIDI
> controller and a custom cable, and
Monday 30 June 2008 Jay Vaughan wrote:
> > i just attended a convention where one of the events was an
> > experimental
> > music set by one of the attendees using a Tenori-On (and jamming
> > with another
> > attendee on a digeridoo[1]),
>
> Yes, the tenori-on is definitely do-able with the OM ph
> Sounds cool. Something completely new or something based on csound,
> supercollider or similar?
Something new, but supercollider and puredata on the Freerunner will
work, I imagine, quite well. Pair it up with some nice MIDI
controller and a custom cable, and you've got a synth/music-makin
> i just attended a convention where one of the events was an
> experimental
> music set by one of the attendees using a Tenori-On (and jamming
> with another
> attendee on a digeridoo[1]),
Yes, the tenori-on is definitely do-able with the OM phone .. I used
to work for a major synth mfr, s
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>>> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
>>> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>> No.
>>
>
>
>
>
> AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
> freerunners being used to create a symphony of soft-synths, with an
> au
> What's wrong with "plain old" bluetooth?
most devices concerned do not have bt: tv, hifi, vcr, dvd player ...
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 6:38 AM, Charles Pax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Sounds interesting. Will you be doing this through cables or IR with a
> device similar to the one featured at
> http://features.engadget.com/2004/07/27/how-to-turn-your-ipod-in-to-a-universal-infrared-remote-control/
What
Monday 30 June 2008 Jay Vaughan wrote:
> > Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
>
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and
Jay Vaughan wrote:
>> Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
>
>
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mix
> Sounds interesting. Will you be doing this through cables or IR with
> a device similar to the one
Cables, of course .. or gadget-audio if possible ..
;
--
Jay Vaughan
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://li
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 7:17 AM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
> too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
> route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mixing' on the
> master phon
> Would you explain this a little more, I'm not sure what you mean.
I am developing a soft-synth for OpenMoko, and I believe others are
too. We would like to jam together, but don't have a mixer. So we
route the audio of one phone to the other, and do 'soft mixing' on the
master phone ..
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 4:25 AM, Jay Vaughan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
> >> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>
> AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
> freerunners being used to create a symphon
>>
>> And just for fun... Would there be any practical purpose for
>> communicating through the headphone/mic jack?
>
> No.
>
AUDIO Routing! Yes! There are practical purposes: multiple
freerunners being used to create a symphony of soft-synths, with an
audio routing network between them t
"Francesco Cat" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Making the FR a walkie-talkie device was in some kind of wishlist I
> think :)
We need GNU Radio on it;).
--
Esben Stien is [EMAIL PROTECTED] s a
http://www. s tn m
irc://irc. b - i . e/%23cont
2008/6/29 Charles Pax <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> In what ways can two Freerunners plausibly communicate? Which is the fastest
> for data transfer?
Wifi and bluetooth for sure
> Can they connect via WiFi without a separate router? I've seen some
> discussion over how the Freerunner cannot be used as an
su, 2008-06-29 kello 13:22 -0400, Charles Pax kirjoitti:
> In what ways can two Freerunners plausibly communicate? Which is the
> fastest for data transfer?
Wifi.
> Can they connect via WiFi without a separate router? I've seen some
> discussion over how the Freerunner cannot be used as an access
In what ways can two Freerunners plausibly communicate? Which is the fastest
for data transfer?
Can they connect via WiFi without a separate router? I've seen some
discussion over how the Freerunner cannot be used as an access point. Does
this mean two Freerunners wouldn't be able to create a netw
21 matches
Mail list logo