Re: MokoMakefile make update forces Bitbake cache rebuild

2007-04-02 Thread Rod Whitby
Henryk Plötz wrote: > Am Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:26:20 +0930 schrieb Rod Whitby: >> The silence-retrieved-revisions patch is the other culprit. This >> seemed to be debugging information that was output during the bbfile >> parsing. Perhaps mickeyl could add that patch permanently to the >> openmoko s

Re: MokoMakefile make update forces Bitbake cache rebuild

2007-04-01 Thread Henryk Plötz
Moin, Am Mon, 02 Apr 2007 12:26:20 +0930 schrieb Rod Whitby: > The openmoko-mirrors patch is one culprit. We may even be able to > remove that patch if the OM team has added the sources site as a > premirror ... This has been done in oe/conf/distro/openmoko.conf quite about a month ago. > The

Re: MokoMakefile make update forces Bitbake cache rebuild

2007-04-01 Thread Rod Whitby
Henryk Plötz wrote: > a make update followed by make always forces a complete rebuild of the > Bitbake cache which takes quite long, too long. (Plus: As a x86_64 user > I'm not entitled to using Psyco.) Yes, this is something we do want to fix. > In principle this rebuild should not be necessary

MokoMakefile make update forces Bitbake cache rebuild

2007-04-01 Thread Henryk Plötz
Moin, a make update followed by make always forces a complete rebuild of the Bitbake cache which takes quite long, too long. (Plus: As a x86_64 user I'm not entitled to using Psyco.) In principle this rebuild should not be necessary since bitbake keeps dependency and timestamp information about