On Thursday 05 June 2008 09:31, Joseph Reeves wrote:
> Yes, you're right, any site can redirect to anywhere else, but if that
> happens and I end up somewhere I don't want to be, I can blacklist
> both the original site and the target. I admit that this may be an
> exercise in futility, but at leas
Yes, you're right, any site can redirect to anywhere else, but if that
happens and I end up somewhere I don't want to be, I can blacklist
both the original site and the target. I admit that this may be an
exercise in futility, but at least it's possible.
My personal mail client, and the one I use
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 5:51 PM, Joerg Reisenweber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Am Do 5. Juni 2008 schrieb AVee:
> > On Wednesday 04 June 2008 22:55, Andy Powell wrote:
> > >
> > > tinyurl is useful instead of typing in twattishly long urls which many
> > > sites insist on using. Generally you don
Am Do 5. Juni 2008 schrieb AVee:
> On Wednesday 04 June 2008 22:55, Andy Powell wrote:
> >
> > tinyurl is useful instead of typing in twattishly long urls which many
> > sites insist on using. Generally you don;t want to click on a link
provided
> > by someone you don't know/trust. Not only that
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 22:55, Andy Powell wrote:
>
> tinyurl is useful instead of typing in twattishly long urls which many
> sites insist on using. Generally you don;t want to click on a link provided
> by someone you don't know/trust. Not only that but if I use this url as an
> example - look
> Those AJAX image widgets seem to be designed adversarially. They
> prevent tabbed browsing of images, make it difficult to link to an
> image, impose additional delays on the viewer, and introduce a new UI
> for navigating the galleries that doesn't fit in with any existing
> browser.
Yeah, I do
On Wednesday 04 June 2008 18:12, Joseph Reeves wrote:
> Disable javascript and it works much better. I use the NoScript FF
> extension.
Best FF extension imho.
> TinyURL on the other hand... Why would anyone ever use that? I never
> click on links unless I know where they link to. Here's a plan f
Disable javascript and it works much better. I use the NoScript FF extension.
TinyURL on the other hand... Why would anyone ever use that? I never
click on links unless I know where they link to. Here's a plan for
abuse:
1: Discover browser 0-day exploit
2: Put up a gallery of FreeRunner pictures
On Wed, Jun 4, 2008 at 10:38 AM, Chris Wright <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2008/6/3 "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> There are some pics and videos by Einstein from freeyourphone.de:
>> - http://tinyurl.com/66ktzl
>
> (URL maps to
> http://freeyourphone.de/portal_v1/gallery/menu
The ones you pointed to do lack the visual cues but that is due to the
implementation, not the design. These usually are not implemented in
AJAX, it is simple javascript. Most implementations supply the visual cues.
The big advantage to using this 'lightbox' display is it focus all
attentio
2008/6/3 "Marco Trevisan (Treviño)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There are some pics and videos by Einstein from freeyourphone.de:
> - http://tinyurl.com/66ktzl
(URL maps to
http://freeyourphone.de/portal_v1/gallery/menu.php?gallery=members&album_id=8
)
Those AJAX image widgets seem to be designed ad
11 matches
Mail list logo