On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We will have a headphone support. And yes it's mini. Mobile phones have
small form factors and lower power usage requirements. All of these
contribute to what hardware we select. Again, we are very open to feedback.
If enough of you guys wa
On 12/1/06 7:45 AM, "Jeff Andros" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So does this mean that a standard SIM card won't work? Is it one of those
> things where you have to cut up your sim card (wonder what do I tell cingular
> when I bring THAT in)? or are we just talking about some kind of combo system
>
On 11/28/06, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/28/06 4:34 AM, "Steve Salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 2. MicroSD: Why? Is the area used by full SD that much larger? To me
> this seems like a huge tradeoff because for full size SD there are so
many
> amazing cards availa
On 11/30/06 1:34 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
>> are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
>> voucher with a serial number in the v1 package. The voucher will give
>> me a discount o
Salve Ole, Sean!
On Thu, 30 Nov 2006, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
> On 11/30/06 12:41 AM, "Ole Tange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Come to think of it: You should always value your customers and give
> > them incentive to buy more from you. So a trade up might apply to the
> > v2->v3 transition a
On 11/30/06 12:41 AM, "Ole Tange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Come to think of it: You should always value your customers and give
> them incentive to buy more from you. So a trade up might apply to the
> v2->v3 transition as well.
It's an interesting idea. At this point let me just sit on it. I
On Wednesday 29 November 2006 22:16, Stuart Gray wrote:
> available, as I am used to getting my phones free on contract, and spending
> $350 on a phone I plan to upgrade not too long after would just be mad.Cant
> wait though, I am really excited for it. Hopefully all my hopes turn into
> reality.
turn into reality.
> Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2006 13:18:41 +> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]> To:
> community@lists.openmoko.org> Subject: Re: Open Moko - GPL?> > On 11/29/06,
> Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > > We're still deciding on how
>
Salve Ole!
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Ole Tange wrote:
> On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On 11/29/06 9:18 PM, "Ole Tange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> /Ole
> >> (Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise
> >> wait for version 2).
> >
> >A trad
On 11/29/06, Dave Crossland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 29/11/06, Ole Tange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Optimal for me:
> Pay USD 350 for v1. When v2 is out: Return v1 and get a deduction of
> the price of USD 350.
>
> But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
> ar
On Wed, 29 Nov 2006, Sean Moss-Pultz wrote:
On 11/28/06 7:31 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
- no bottle opener
What!?
It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
fold-out bottle opener to open the b
On 29/11/06, Ole Tange <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Optimal for me:
Pay USD 350 for v1. When v2 is out: Return v1 and get a deduction of
the price of USD 350.
But I will assume that this will not work for you: The returned v1s
are probably worthless to you. So a better way might be to include a
v
On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 11/29/06 9:18 PM, "Ole Tange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /Ole
> (Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise
> wait for version 2).
A trade up option is interesting idea. What exactly do you have in mind?
Opt
On 11/29/06 9:18 PM, "Ole Tange" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> /Ole
> (Who would go for version 1 if there is a trade-up option. Otherwise
> wait for version 2).
A trade up option is interesting idea. What exactly do you have in mind?
-Sean
___
OpenMo
On 11/28/06 7:31 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> - no bottle opener
>>>
>>
>> What!?
>
> It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
> made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
> fold-out bottle opener to open the beer.
> Since years I'm waiting
On 11/28/06 7:55 AM, "Robert Michel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And I hope that you will not unsubscribe, as well,
> I proise to write more focused in the future ;)
I for one, find your emails quite entertaining. Stuffed full of things that
make us think. Please keep up the good work ;-)
-Sea
On 11/29/06, Sean Moss-Pultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
We're still deciding on how open we can be with the hardware. Please keep in
mind this is a legal mine field. Every single component we use (expert
perhaps the CPU) needs an NDA just to read the datasheet. I would love to
see open hardware.
On 11/28/06 4:34 AM, "Steve Salazar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
(snip software questions...as Mickey answered those wonderfully)
> Hardware:
> --
>
> 1. This is sort of a rhetorical question: Why innovate? Why not just make
> semi-knockoffs of very popular existing phone
Thanks for the quick reply. See my answers in line below (disclaimer: I
didn't really delve deeply into these questions so my notion of what I/O is
available is foggy and probably contains serious misunderstandings which
possibly will render my replies somewhat incoherent)
Salve Steve!
> 1
Salve Corey!
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Corey wrote:
> On Monday 27 November 2006 16:14, Robert Michel wrote:
>
> > - no bottle opener
> >
>
> What!?
A joke.
> unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oh, I overseen a line... Why should I unsubscribe?
Because I forgot to say the opener should be dual
use - b
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robert Michel wrote:
> It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
> made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
> fold-out bottle opener to open the beer.
> Since years I'm waiting for a mobile with that...
> Which real m
Salve Corey!
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Corey wrote:
> On Monday 27 November 2006 16:14, Robert Michel wrote:
>
> > - no bottle opener
> >
>
> What!?
It's a pitty the Neo1973 will not have a case a frame
made by strong, but light magnesium alloy, with integrated,
fold-out bottle opener to open the
On Monday 27 November 2006 16:14, Robert Michel wrote:
> - no bottle opener
>
What!?
unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/community
Salve Steve!
On Mon, 27 Nov 2006, Steve Salazar wrote:
> Wow, thanks for all the very quick responses. Sorry if I sounded a little
> confrontational or if some of my questions were already answered in other
> posts but, you know, you get a little skeptical and this project does
> *almost* see
Hey, now that I read the presentation I feel a little foolish posting a link
to ESR's essays :) Oh well. Once again, thanks and good luck.
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/cgi-bin/mailman/li
Salve Steve!
> 1. It is mentioned that the gui was designed using gtk. Will the sources
> for all the interface be released? For that matter, will the sources for
> everything, including the os itself, drivers, etc be released?
yes, see the webblog of Harald Welte:
http://gnumonks.org/~lafor
Wow, thanks for all the very quick responses. Sorry if I sounded a little
confrontational or if some of my questions were already answered in other
posts but, you know, you get a little skeptical and this project does
*almost* seem too good to be true (because it sounds that good).
Anyway, co
Steve Salazar wrote:
> 1. It is mentioned that the gui was designed using gtk. Will the sources
> for all the interface be released?
Yes.
> For that matter, will the sources for
> everything, including the os itself, drivers, etc be released?
Yes.
> Will
> openmoko follow an open development m
2006/11/27, Steve Salazar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
- Camera: People who say don't bother with a 1.3Mpix camera are
photographers or otherwise photography enthusiasts. 90% of the people are
very happy at 1.3M because at 1.3 you can do photo album sized images with
very high quality that most peopl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Corey schreef:
> On Monday 27 November 2006 14:11, Koen Kooi wrote:
>> Steve Salazar schreef:
>>> - Storage: 1GB minimum integrated SD for running a real linux.
>> Kernel 2.6.17.7 isn't real enough for you? ;)
>>
>
> Heheh - when will it become clear
On Monday 27 November 2006 14:11, Koen Kooi wrote:
> Steve Salazar schreef:
> > - Storage: 1GB minimum integrated SD for running a real linux.
>
> Kernel 2.6.17.7 isn't real enough for you? ;)
>
Heheh - when will it become clear that:
"linux" == kernel && kernel != userland
Still, you knew
On Monday 27 November 2006 13:34, Steve Salazar wrote:
> 3. Why did you not use opie or gpe?
>
I don't know anything about gpe, but opie uses QT, and QT is GPL - so
anything written that uses the QT libraries must therefore also be GPL.
GTK is LGPL, so you can use the gtk libraries in your applic
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Salazar schreef:
>
> Hi. First of all I want to repeat what many others on this list have
> already said. I am very excited about the open moko project and the
> opportunities it represents. I will be one of the first in line to buy
> an open
Hi. First of all I want to repeat what many others on this list have
already said. I am very excited about the open moko project and the
opportunities it represents. I will be one of the first in line to buy an
openmoko phone when they are available.
I have a few questions. Thanks in adv
34 matches
Mail list logo
