Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-11 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
Hi, I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his dicision. From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid, because of following reasons: 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten

Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-11 Thread Bernhard Reiter
community@lists.openmoko.org Betreff: Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33) Datum: Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:48:28 +0300 (2011-03-09 20:48:28) Hi, I hope

Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-10 Thread Dmitry Chistikov
Gennady Kupava, Mar. 09, 2011, 22:48 +0300: 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten tomatoes to me plese) 2. qt has it's own resource management, FSO - it's own, rewriting qt one to FSO one is worthless effort

Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-09 Thread Gennady Kupava
Hi, I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his dicision. From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid, because of following reasons: 1. qt stack has richer functionalily, better performance, and less bugs than that FSO dbus/vala thing (don't throw rotten

Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-09 Thread zyth
Agree with Gennady. Look what happened to SHR! It is also necessary to fix rndis usb-host ) On Wed, 09 Mar 2011 22:48:28 +0300, Gennady Kupava wrote: Hi, I hope there is still some chances that Radek will change his dicision. From my point of view where is no real need in FSO/qt gibrid,

QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-08 Thread Dmitry Chistikov
Radek Polak, Mar. 04, 2011, 07:37 +0100: i have uploaded new qtmoko v33 images to sourceforge now [1]. [...] The list is quite short on how much of work it was. Hello, Radek! Thank you for the work you are doing. Most of the effort was to package everything with debian package system. This

Re: QtMoko and FSO (was: qtmoko v33)

2011-03-08 Thread Radek Polak
Dmitry Chistikov wrote: I'm afraid it's too early to ask, but could you give an estimate on how much time it'll take to enable the use of FSO framework? Just something like about a year or, say, not less than four months. Writing simple dialer application could be matter of days/hours.