Andrew Chu wrote:
Hi Abdel,
Actually, the patch is what is compiled into the 0.1+svn beta version of
dfu-util for Win32 on projects.openmoko.org. I'm assuming that that
is the version that everyone here is using?
Yes for me at least.
I also am using WinXP SP2 as Benedikt Schindler on
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for the feedback that the dfu-util for Win32 is that much slower
on Vista. I wasn't aware of that. The changes I made to the dfu-util
source code were minimal but they could use a code review (I've posted
the diff
Nishit Dave wrote:
On Tue, Sep 2, 2008 at 8:55 AM, Andrew Chu
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Thanks for the feedback that the dfu-util for Win32 is that much slower
on Vista. I wasn't aware of that. The changes I made to the dfu-util
source code were minimal
Nishit Dave wrote:
I'm using Windows XP with 512 MB RAM on my laptop. rootfs flashing
takes between 1-2 hours IIRC.
I'm using Windows XP with 1280 MB RAM on my laptop (Centrino 1.7 GHz).
rootfs flashing takes 1h15 .
___
Openmoko community
Laptop / winXP SP2
i just need 10 minutes
and i think this is normal for 60MB via usb 1.0
yves mahe schrieb:
Nishit Dave wrote:
I'm using Windows XP with 512 MB RAM on my laptop. rootfs flashing
takes between 1-2 hours IIRC.
I'm using Windows XP with 1280 MB RAM on my
Benedikt Schindler wrote:
Laptop / winXP SP2
i just need 10 minutes
and i think this is normal for 60MB via usb 1.0
Usb 1.1 can offer up to 1.5 MB/s so ideally 60MB should be transferred
in 40 seconds. This is of course not counting the memory writing on the
flash memory which could be
Hi Abdel,
Actually, the patch is what is compiled into the 0.1+svn beta version of
dfu-util for Win32 on projects.openmoko.org. I'm assuming that that
is the version that everyone here is using?
I also am using WinXP SP2 as Benedikt Schindler on these replies is
using as well. For the
, 2008 12:53 PM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Flashing Om2008.8 rootfs under Windows is *LONG*
Hi Abdel,
Actually, the patch is what is compiled into the 0.1+svn beta version of
dfu-util for Win32 on projects.openmoko.org. I'm assuming that that
is the version that everyone
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to share my experience with FR and Windows Vista.
Well, that was just a first time user experience :-)
Abdel.
You haven't even tried backing it up. Try and see how long *that* takes.
They say it
Nishit Dave wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 7:01 PM, Abdelrazak Younes
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello,
I wanted to share my experience with FR and Windows Vista.
Well, that was just a first time user experience :-)
Abdel.
You haven't even tried
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You haven't even tried backing it up. Try and see how long *that* takes.
They say it is much, much better with the Linux port of DFU-util (or
rather, something is very very wrong with the Windows port).
snip
Thanks for the feedback that the dfu-util for Win32 is that much slower
on Vista. I wasn't aware of that. The changes I made to the dfu-util
source code were minimal but they could use a code review (I've posted
the diff below). On Windows XP, I've never had to wait more than 20
minutes to
Try virtualbox. I don't think VMware server has native usb support.
VirtualBox however supports any USB device AFAIK
-Nick
Vinc Duran wrote:
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 12:57 PM, Abdelrazak Younes [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
snip
You haven't even tried backing it up.
FWIW, I have a laptop with 2gig ram and the host if Windows XP. I know I
know, but for work that's what I need. So I use the free
http://virtualbox.org and run a virtualized Ubuntu on my Windows XP SP3 box,
but I'm sure it is fine in Vista also. That way one does not have to
shutdown one or the
14 matches
Mail list logo
