From my POV, when people at OpenMoko decided on GTK for its paltform they
are giving developers the ability to participate and influence *directly* on
its development, and create great apps, both opensource and proprietary,
without paying any license fees. The Nokia decision when build the Maemo
License fees for Qtopia (and Qt) are a pittance compared to the fees of
even one engineer for one year for any company
Yes I agree with you before you said it:
Look that the pricing is not the most importante issue
You can influence directly the development of Qtopia very easily.
It appears more
Marcelo Lira wrote:
From my POV, when people at OpenMoko decided on GTK for its paltform
they are giving developers the ability to participate and influence
*directly* on its development, and create great apps, both opensource
and proprietary, without paying any license fees. The Nokia
Marcelo Lira wrote:
License fees for Qtopia (and Qt) are a pittance compared to the fees of
even one engineer for one year for any company
Yes I agree with you before you said it:
Look that the pricing is not the most importante issue
You can influence directly the development of Qtopia
]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: GTK vs QTopia vs Android - (was: Re: Android
needsapplications) (will be: new vision for openmoko)
On Fri, 2007-11-16 at 14:30 +0100, Michael Schmidt wrote:
If I understand it right, the neo phone has now three options for an
operating system
- the current openmoko
5 matches
Mail list logo
