On Friday 04 May 2007 06:09, Hans L wrote:
out. AFAIK Stereo sound works best when the sources are far apart,
but in this case they are essentially coming from the same point in
space.
IMBWOTO, but the idea of small stereo devices is that the two speakers emit
sound in different directions,
My experience was very different. My Tapwave Zodiac (best portable
thing ever made... *sigh*) had awesome stereo sound, even without
headphones. It's also quite noticable with other devices whether they
have stereo sound or not. The problem with the 1973 is that it will
probably be rotated a lot.
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like any drop
from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less weight generally means
more flimsy devices.
I have had the NEO in my hands and although the numbers may make if sound like
it is chunky it is not AND when held
Am 03.05.2007 um 13:32 schrieb Ian Stirling:
wim delvaux wrote:
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like
any drop from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less
weight generally means more flimsy devices.
No. It is easy to make a fragile looking
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
Am 03.05.2007 um 13:32 schrieb Ian Stirling:
wim delvaux wrote:
FWIW,
most of these 'light' phones do seem so 'fragile'. It looks like any
drop from pocket or table might smash them to bits. Less weight
generally means more flimsy devices.
No. It is easy
Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote:
That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
I think is better to compare with this nokia new model, price is also
interesting( in Italy)
9300i 172g 132x51x21 mm 126cc 475€ wifi
E65 115g 105x49x15.5mm74cc 360€ wifi
N95 120g 99x53x21mm 728€ GPS+wifi
also interesting this model without phone:
N800 206g
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
I have in the past proposed little legs and arms like seen in the adverts.
Fur would just be fun.
However.
To stop it getting tangled up, it'd
Ian Stirling writes:
Sander van Grieken wrote:
Ian Stirling wrote:
That's not solely robustness though, air resistance helps lots too.
Hmm do you propose a furry casing?
I have in the past proposed little legs and arms like seen in the adverts.
Fur would just be fun.
However.
To stop it
Hmm... I cannot find any good reason to have 2 speakers eighter. Maybe the
reason is that they want the sound to be better distributed in all
direction? - Anyway, you can always remove one or two speakers when you get
the phone. It is not very complicated.
Hello,
here's the size and weight of a few touchscreen mobile phones:
Neo1973 iPhone M600i LG Prada
length (mm) 120.7115 107 98.8
width 62 61 57 54
height18.5 11.6 15 12
weight (g)184 135 112 85
Please consider dpi comparison in which Neo is unbeatable winner.
The display of the Neo is definitely great, but I agree with Sven, the
device is a bit too big.
Especially it is too thick.
I think the iPhone can only be so thin because the battery is built-in.
Maciej Ligenza wrote:
Sven,
On 5/2/07, Sven Neuhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also the biggest. It weighs almost *twice* as much as the
LG Prada, despite having a smaller screen! [..cut..]
The iPhone has a *much bigger* screen than the Neo1973 and it's still
smaller and a lot lighter.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Stirling wrote:
Maciej Ligenza wrote:
Sven,
On 5/2/07, Sven Neuhaus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It's also the biggest. It weighs almost *twice* as much as the
LG Prada, despite having a smaller screen! [..cut..]
The iPhone has a *much
Subject: Re: Size and weight considerations for future Openmoko devices
Date: Wed 02 May 07 03:24:43PM +0200
Quoting Andreas Kostyrka ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
Yes, it makes the text a tiny bit sharper, and if you bring it to 20cm
from the eye, and have good eyes, you can read 80
50g is a huge difference. It is the exact difference between a RAZR and an
i-mate JAM (O2 XDA mini II, Qtek S100) is exactly 50g. Having owned both, I
can tell that it is a very noticable difference. I did not know the Neo1973
was that heavy. This completely changes my view of the device.
Dnia środa, 2 maja 2007, Andreas Kostyrka napisał:
It's a smartphone, so let's compare it to smartphones:
Nokia 9500: 56.9mm x 148.1mm x 23.9mm 229.9g
T-mobile MDA compact III: 58.0mm x 108.0mm x 17.0mm 127.0g
T-mobile Vario II:58.0mm x 113.0mm x 22.0mm 160.0g
Nokia
Quoth your link:
All in all, the P3300 features a typical display for a Windows
Mobile-powered communicator, which doesn't stand out against the
background of its rivals.
It's just another Windows PDA/phone. Boring.
-Steven
On 5/2/07, Marcin Juszkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Dnia środa,
Am Mittwoch, 2. Mai 2007 19:16 schrieb Marcin Juszkiewicz:
Then compare it to HTC Artemis:
It has QVGA screen 2.8, cpu: omap850 200MHz, 64M ram, 128M flash.
omap850 is probably the worst modern CPU for running Linux.
It is slow, undocumented and uses main DRAM for the GSM operation.
There
Dnia środa, 2 maja 2007, Steven ** napisał:
It's just another Windows PDA/phone. Boring.
It is also small, light and have interesting input device which allow to
do most of tasks with one hand.
Most of current devices are boring. Neo is also huge and thick. Battery
cover feel like 'I will
20 matches
Mail list logo