Hi,
Am 15.01.2013 um 13:18 schrieb Yury Sakarinen:
>
> acceptable GTA04 price poll results:
>
> up to 300 euro - 22%
> up to 400 euro - 48%
> up to 500 euro - 15%
> up to 600 euro - 15%
>
> Total votes: 27
Thanks for running the poll!
It matches with our experiences, that a GTA04 costs more
"Phoenix's Thirteen" (c)
Yury Sakarinen писал 2013-01-15 16:18:
acceptable GTA04 price poll results:
up to 300 euro - 22%
up to 400 euro - 48%
up to 500 euro - 15%
up to 600 euro - 15%
Total votes: 27
It would be nice to find a sponsor (fosdem2013 conference), which
will be able to to compe
acceptable GTA04 price poll results:
up to 300 euro - 22%
up to 400 euro - 48%
up to 500 euro - 15%
up to 600 euro - 15%
Total votes: 27
It would be nice to find a sponsor (fosdem2013 conference), which will
be able to to compensate GTA04 price difference with the desired ~400
euros (for who
Let's count GTA04 interest and preferences:
http://www.easypolls.net/poll.html?p=50f115aae4b04de5024b172e
Bob Ham писал 2013-01-12 01:23:
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:43 +0100, Christoph Pulster wrote:
The hardware GTA04 is based on one person (Nikolaus), the software
QtMoko is based on one per
Dear Diary. For me gta04 expensive. I'm willing to buy it for the same
price I bought my freerunner 5 years ago in Idasystems. It is about 385
euros plus delivery. Note: for this price, I buy only the motherboard
without a case and screen. If it were possible to sell all produced for
this momen
On Fri, 2013-01-11 at 20:43 +0100, Christoph Pulster wrote:
> The hardware GTA04 is based on one person (Nikolaus), the software
> QtMoko is based on one person (Radek). My daily cudos for both of them.
> But I am afraid we really need a broader basis of manpower.
I think it's unfair to mention
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 7:51 PM, Peter Viskup wrote:
> On 01/11/2013 05:04 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Thamos wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> i am ambiguous about that.
>>> I think we have already enough Operating Systems with QtMoko and SHR and
>>> Replica
On Friday 11 January 2013 19:00:37 Radek Polak wrote:
> On Friday, January 11, 2013 05:04:28 PM Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
> > Ubuntu and Firefox OS may be good opportunities to use for marketing.
>
> Yup, i think if we were the first HW that runs Firefox OS and Ubuntu this
> could make our pho
On 01/11/2013 05:04 PM, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Thamos wrote:
Hi,
i am ambiguous about that.
I think we have already enough Operating Systems with QtMoko and SHR and
Replicant. (Did i miss a really working distro?)
But, as it seems to me, we don't have en
Am 11.01.2013 um 19:04 schrieb robin:
> The biggest problem I see with the GTA04 is
> the very limited amount of active developers and the reliability of the
> distri-
> butions. I don't think it can handle much more losses on the developer side
The FOSDEM stand will be a good opportunity to a
Hi
I guess parts of the answer to the question are already spread through this
thread:
http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.comp.handhelds.openmoko.community/62745
Generally speaking I think having an option to what runs on a device is heaven,
but only if you are a developer or interested in linux a
On Friday, January 11, 2013 05:04:28 PM Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote:
> Ubuntu and Firefox OS may be good opportunities to use for marketing.
Yup, i think if we were the first HW that runs Firefox OS and Ubuntu this
could make our phone mentioned in some bigger magazines and make some noise.
Re
2013/1/11 Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
> On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Thamos wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > i am ambiguous about that.
> > I think we have already enough Operating Systems with QtMoko and SHR and
> > Replicant. (Did i miss a really working distro?)
> > But, as it seems to me, we don't have
On Fri, Jan 11, 2013 at 4:49 PM, Thamos wrote:
> Hi,
>
> i am ambiguous about that.
> I think we have already enough Operating Systems with QtMoko and SHR and
> Replicant. (Did i miss a really working distro?)
> But, as it seems to me, we don't have enough software developers, and as
> Mozilla and
Hi,
i am ambiguous about that.
I think we have already enough Operating Systems with QtMoko and SHR and
Replicant. (Did i miss a really working distro?)
But, as it seems to me, we don't have enough software developers, and as
Mozilla and Ubuntu are big projects, this seems to be a way to use their
15 matches
Mail list logo
