Hi I just recieved an interesting mail in the Xorg MailingList this was
the contents :
Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference
in the memory usage between X11 and kdrive on the OMAP.
I am told that the full Xorg isn't very happy when built against
uClibc.
So
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 11:29:38 +0100
Graeme Gregory [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Ok, I may have mangled the history a little here, but this is the
basics I hope.
When we first started on this kdrive/tinyX was the playground for
new features within the xorg/xf86 family. xorg didn't support
Hey,
as far as I know there's a special modified version of kdrive (called xglamo)
to accelerate the glamo-chip within the device.
These (hardcoded) changes are based on kdrive and I think that's the reason why
kdrive is used instead of xorg.
Please correct me if I'm wrong.
Greets
mirko
Ok, I messed this email up :-)
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 11:27 +0100, Graeme Gregory wrote:
Hi I just recieved an interesting mail in the Xorg MailingList this was
the contents :
Why not just go for the full X11? Memory wise I found no difference
in the memory usage between X11 and
4 matches
Mail list logo
