[CU] Draft conforming to OM Wiki editing guidelines

2009-07-21 Thread Nicola Mfb
Hi!
Some underground effort is going to evolve Community Updates.
Patryk Benderz is doing a great work defining guide lines [1] and
showing an example of them for the next community update [2].

I'm forwarding our last mail to thanks it and share.
Community feedbacks, suggestions, collaborations will be very apreciated!

I like the new layout and Patryk templates and propose for it's
immediate adoption :)

[1] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Update_Draft
[2] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Community_Update_Draft

Regards

Nicola Ranaldo

-- Forwarded message --
From: Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com
Date: Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 3:03 PM
Subject: Re: [CU] Draft conforming to OM Wiki editing guidlines
To: patryk.bend...@esp.pl


On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 12:39 PM, Patryk Benderzpatryk.bend...@esp.pl wrote:
 Hi Nicola,
        I have started wiki on making Community Update Draft
 conforming to OM Wiki editing guidelines:
 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Update_Draft
 I would appreciate your constructive criticism.

Hi Patryk! really a *great* work, thanks for your effort in CU!
It' all perfect, only one point: applications with no screenshot is a
bit disturbing, the logo may be substituted with a smaller pic or
simple a text screenshot not available.

Another good idea is to create a draft example page to copy when the
new CU draft has to be created again.

According to me it's no too late for adopting it immediately, If you
synced all news from the actual draft page to the new, feel free to
swap the two page, if unsure we may just contact Risto too, as it
started the CU when OM dropped it, just to have another +1 (I'm sure
he will agree), wath do you think about?

And last, this time please release *you* the next CU, it's important
your effert will get gratifications :)

   Nicola

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: [CU] Draft conforming to OM Wiki editing guidelines

2009-07-21 Thread Patryk Benderz
[cut]
 It' all perfect, only one point: applications with no screenshot is a
 bit disturbing, the logo may be substituted with a smaller pic or
 simple a text screenshot not available.
You are right. I was doing this layout last evening, and had a little
time to find something which would fit better. I was looking for
pictures here:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Special:Imagelist
but there are tons of files, thus was hard to dig through those. Maybe
some of you guys know of existing default image that would fit to put
in, when there is no default application screen shot?

 Another good idea is to create a draft example page to copy when the
 new CU draft has to be created again.
That is easy part. Deleting all this data from draft and leaving only
default examples would do the trick. I have filled in some data to show
how finished  CU would look like.

 According to me it's no too late for adopting it immediately, If you
 synced all news from the actual draft page to the new, feel free to
 swap the two page, if unsure we may just contact Risto too, as it
 started the CU when OM dropped it, just to have another +1 (I'm sure
 he will agree), wath do you think about?
I agree. Looks like he follows this mailing list, so I will await for
his comment.

 And last, this time please release *you* the next CU, it's important
 your effert will get gratifications :)
As i enlightened here:
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Talk:Community_Update_Draft#Community_Update_releasing_process
It is not important who releases CU, but HOW does he do it. Use 'move'
link and all contributions history will be saved ;). I have tested this:
1. made test page
2. edited it several times
3. moved it to another name
4. ...and viola, all history was at it's place. ;)

-- 
Kind Regards

Patryk Benderz
IT Specialist
Linux Registered User #377521
+48 22 538 6292

ERSTE Securities Polska S.A.
ul. Królewska 16
Warszawa 00-103
KRS 065121
NIP 526-10-27-638
REGON 011136053
Kapitał akcyjny: 15.500.000 złotych (w pełni opłacony)

This message and any attached files are confidential and intended solely
for the addressee(s). Any publication, transmission or other use of the
information by a person or entity other than the intended addressee is
prohibited. If you receive this in error please contact the sender and
delete the material. The sender does not accept liability for any errors
or omissions as a result of the transmission.


Email secured by Check Point

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Wiki Editing Guidelines

2007-02-27 Thread Ole Tange

On 2/21/07, Lars Hallberg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

Harald Welte skrev:
 This is really important not to confuse users.  Imagine somebody
 googling for GSM Phone and Wifi and he ends up in our wiki on a page
 that describes what wonderful things you can do with wifi on an [not
 explicitly marked as imaginary] OpenEZX phone.  Now that person buys a
 device, to only then find out that this is some wishlist/dream of
 somebody.

It's even more complicated... OpenMoko being a distribution. An idea may
or may not be implemented in the distribution. May demand some hardware
features of the device. Finally, different devices that physically have
those features may or may not have these feature supported in the
distribution.




Marking things wishlist is a start, but listing needed hardware features
is nest step, and when it matures and start being implemented, listing
supported devices may be a good idea.


I still do not like the wishlist concept for reasons I described earlier.

I have given it some thought and I have implemented it on
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Distance_Measuring

Does this address Lars' and Harald's concerns well enough?


/Ole

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Wiki Editing Guidelines

2007-02-21 Thread Lars Hallberg

Harald Welte skrev:

This is really important not to confuse users.  Imagine somebody
googling for GSM Phone and Wifi and he ends up in our wiki on a page
that describes what wonderful things you can do with wifi on an [not
explicitly marked as imaginary] OpenEZX phone.  Now that person buys a
device, to only then find out that this is some wishlist/dream of
somebody.


It's even more complicated... OpenMoko being a distribution. An idea may 
or may not be implemented in the distribution. May demand some hardware 
features of the device. Finally, different devices that physically have 
those features may or may not have these feature supported in the 
distribution.


Marking things wishlist is a start, but listing needed hardware features 
is nest step, and when it matures and start being implemented, listing 
supported devices may be a good idea.


But maybe a list of OpenMoke supported devices and what features are 
supported for those devices can replace a list of supported device for 
each application/idea.


/LaH


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Wiki Editing Guidelines

2007-02-20 Thread Harald Welte
On Tue, Feb 20, 2007 at 01:58:38PM +, Ole Tange wrote:
 On 2/19/07, Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 From reviewing the 'Recent Changes', I have drafted a (currently still)
 small list of rules for Wiki editing.  It is available at
 http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenMoko_Wiki_Editing_Guidelines
 
 I like most of the guidelines.
 
 I am not too happy about the Wishlist part, though. Putting wishlist
 in the title will imply that an idea can only have 2 states: Being on
 the wishlist or not. And that is not the case.
 
 It is a continuum where an idea progresses from being just a wild idea
 to being a rock solid application.

I agree with you.

However, I would really like to see anything non-factual (or, let's say,
anything that is not on our 'official roadmap') to be clearly marked, if
not better in some specific section of the wiki only.  Or maybe in a
different wiki alltogether(!).  Please don't get me wrong, I appreciate
the creativity of all those suggestions.  But we cannot have more
suggestions/dreams/plans in the wiki than actual, factual content. I
we run into that case, the wiki simply becomes irrelevant to people who
want to actually practically learn something about OpenMoko and/or the
supported devices.

This is really important not to confuse users.  Imagine somebody
googling for GSM Phone and Wifi and he ends up in our wiki on a page
that describes what wonderful things you can do with wifi on an [not
explicitly marked as imaginary] OpenEZX phone.  Now that person buys a
device, to only then find out that this is some wishlist/dream of
somebody.

It has to be clearly visible in the page itself.  One way of enforcing
tihs is to put it in the title.

 Also some of the pages will include ideas that have parts that could
 be implemented now, but that contains advanced options that requires,
 say, WiFi.

yes, this is why all that stuff should _actually_ be in some
ticket/issue tracking system, such as bugzilla.  Those systems can track
dependencies, as well as differentiate the current status of an item.

However, bug tracking systems usually cannot collaboratively change the
'bug description'. So ideally, things should mature in the wiki, and
only items with very detailed specification go into bugzilla wishlist
items.

I don't have a golden solution for this.  Maybe one can configure a
Section in the wiki, which has a slightly different layout/style, i.e.
that really optically differentiates.  We could then have a policy that
such 'dream' pages can only be linked from the Dreams main page, or
whatever.

-- 
- Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://openmoko.org/

Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Wiki Editing Guidelines

2007-02-19 Thread Harald Welte
Hi!

From reviewing the 'Recent Changes', I have drafted a (currently still)
small list of rules for Wiki editing.  It is available at 
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/OpenMoko_Wiki_Editing_Guidelines

The most impportant one I would like to point out is that the Neo1973 is
only _one_ of the devices that run OpenMoko.  Thus, all hardware related
information that you add, needs to indicate that it relates to Neo1973.

Stuff like Battery and I2C e.g. come to my mind.  Also the Buying
Interest List is actually a Neo1973 Buying Interest List, if you
think about it :)

Thanks for keeping this in mind,
-- 
- Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://openmoko.org/

Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: Wiki Editing Guidelines

2007-02-19 Thread Harald Welte
On Mon, Feb 19, 2007 at 03:19:50PM +, Ian Stirling wrote:

 Stuff like Battery and I2C e.g. come to my mind.  Also the Buying
 Interest List is actually a Neo1973 Buying Interest List, if you
 think about it :)
 
 Well - to be honest, for me, it's not.

From my point of view the whole 'buying interest list' isn't really
important for the wiki anyway.

For whom is that list?  FIC?  They will produce more than 64 phones
anywy ;) Its all cool and nice that people indicate their interest in
so many ways - but is it useful? 

Once openmoko.com goes online, there will be a possibility to pre-order
the Neo1973.

 While I am very grateful to FIC for their involvement in OpenMoko, if 
 someone came up with mostly comparable open hardware with Wifi, 
 available at a similar time, and it wasn't too much more expensive...

Well, it's the OpenMoko wiki, after all.  So if somebody else offered
comparable open hardware, plus there would be openmoko support for it:
Yes, I agree, then that would fit on a 'buying list' in the openmoko
wiki. Otherwise, if there's no relation to OpenMoko, there's no point in
having this information in the wiki.

And yes, such device support can (and will!) eventually be provided by
the community, no problem here at all.  We _do want_ to support more
devices in the future, but we (the current paid development team) can't
stretch our way too thin resources on that right now.

 If Motorola were to open the A1200, for example, it'd be a temptation. 
 (not very much, I'd really quite like GPS)

It doesn't have Wifi either, does it?

-- 
- Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://openmoko.org/

Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community