Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Sebastian Hammerl wrote: > Hi, > > Here are some updates about cellhunter. I am currently working at an > online map so you can view already found cells around you. I am using > tangogps to display the cells and it looks like: > http://78.47.116.33/~hole/cellhunter/images/tangogps.png > > I creat

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, Here are some updates about cellhunter. I am currently working at an online map so you can view already found cells around you. I am using tangogps to display the cells and it looks like: http://78.47.116.33/~hole/cellhunter/images/tangogps.png I created a tangogps repository which overlays t

Re: Local GSM db on the phone (Was:Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future)

Thanks man! I am a bit offline right now, dont have internet in my house and have to use internet cafes :( But it makes time for reading code, lol -fredrin- On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 4:03 PM, Onen wrote: > fredrik normann wrote: > > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Onen http://onen.om>@free.fr >

Local GSM db on the phone (Was:Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future)

fredrik normann wrote: > On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Onen http://onen.om>@free.fr > > wrote: > > Hi, > as stated before, FSO team has started some work on database on the > phone. Maybe you should get in touch with them, in order to build > something together.

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Onen wrote: > Hi, > as stated before, FSO team has started some work on database on the > phone. Maybe you should get in touch with them, in order to build > something together. > Are there some code somewhere that i can look at? Of course if you think openBmap

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, as stated before, FSO team has started some work on database on the phone. Maybe you should get in touch with them, in order to build something together. Of course if you think openBmap could be of any help with your work, feel free to get in touch with me! Onen fredrik normann wrote: >

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Understand that things are moving in the same direction :) but I still think a local db of the data you have collected yourself is a good idea :) I am playing with some code my self now, trying to make something. -f- On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:48 AM, Onen wrote: > Hi, > > regarding the settings

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, regarding the settings based on location. ptitjes from SHR is working on an ologicd, which implements reasoning on the phone. He is interested in this cell location based service, as one of the inputs for his ologicd. Onen fredrik normann wrote: > Wouln't it be smarter to have a local db o

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, sorry but I am not sure to get your point. At the moment, the clients (possibly stores the logs, for later upload) upload to their respective online dbs. Jan, from the FSO team has built a proof of concept of a service on the phone (see FSO 5.5 beta announcement), which based on the db of

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, do you mean a local db, and you do not upload to an online db at all? Onen fredrik normann wrote: > Wouln't it be smarter to have a local db on the phone, so after a while > the phone will learn where it is all the time and can aply diffrent > settings do things according to that? > > -f-

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

fredrik normann wrote: > Wouln't it be smarter to have a local db on the phone, so after a while > the phone will learn where it is all the time and can aply diffrent > settings do things according to that? > > -f- > It seems a smart behaviour but still there is no activity in this direction in

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

And then you can have a sync scripts that syncs to what ever database you like, cellhunter, openBmap -f- On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 3:00 PM, fredrik normann < fredrik.normann.j...@gmail.com> wrote: > Wouln't it be smarter to have a local db on the phone, so after a while the > phone will learn

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Wouln't it be smarter to have a local db on the phone, so after a while the phone will learn where it is all the time and can aply diffrent settings do things according to that? -f- On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 12:42 PM, Onen wrote: > Hi, > > adding to my last comments... > > Onen wrote: > > > > Ok.

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, adding to my last comments... Onen wrote: > > Ok. If I understand you correctly, you would like some kind of anonymous > account, where people could upload if they don't want to create an > account? Did I understand you correctly? > > Well I have nothing against it, it is a good idea to m

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

.jtp?type=node&node=2665694&i=0> > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community > > > ------------------------ > This email is a reply to your post @ > http://n2.nabble.com/cellhunter-the-state-of-development-and-future-tp2657164p2

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hello. On Mon, 2009-04-20 at 05:05, vale wrote: > > why do we need so many databases doing the same? > > cellhunter has far more cells than openbmap, so why not just bundle the > effort and only have one database for getting cells with openmoko? Seems you did not read my mail. To get the backgr

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

but we will not go > with > opencellid just because they have the most data yet. > > regards > Stefan Schmidt > > ___ > Openmoko community mailing list > community@lists.openmoko.org > http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

[Resend as the ml seems not to like my other email address, but do not inform me about this either...] Hello. On Sun, 2009-04-19 at 15:58, Sebastian Hammerl wrote: > > So here is the call to all the developers around to create a location > service based on the opencellid data. for me that databa

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Al Johnson wrote: >> These are great news. But it is very sorry that now no one claimed that >> this functionality will be provided. To speak more frankly many people >> would be glad to hear from the developer of TangoGPS, Marcus Bauer, that >> he is going to implement this feature. > > Why shoul

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

ivvmm wrote: > > Okay, I see. The both applications: openBmap and Cellhunter have their > advantages and disadvantages. > Please, feel free to write to me (publicly or privately) with your comments and/or suggestions about openBmap. The ToDo list is growing at the moment with people suggestio

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

On Sunday 19 April 2009, ivvmm wrote: > Sebastian Hammerl wrote: > > Cellhunter will cooperate with opencellid.org, the largest cell database > > i know. with the api of opencellid someone can offer a program to get a > > fix with cells or agps support. perhaps some location service will be > > add

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Sebastian Hammerl wrote: > Hi, > > At the moment it is only me involved in the developing of cellhunter. At > the end of mai i will finish my master thesis and then i will have some > more time for cellhunter and developing will go on. Can't wait for the future versions, or to say more for more f

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Onen wrote: > Hi, > > ivvmm wrote: >> I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? > > I am working on a similar project openBmap[1]. A thread has been started > by Stefan from FSO about the state of the collaboration between the > projects [2][3]. I am for collaborat

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, ivvmm schrieb: > I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? > In fact no one in my country is using it(looked at the map on > cellhunter's site). By also looking at the map we can see that many > regions are already covered. > > At the moment it is only me invol

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Pander wrote: > Yorick Moko wrote: >> On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Onen wrote: >>> ivvmm wrote: I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? >>> This brings three questions: >>> 1. if you have big HPV-Dops, your position is not very precise. If you >>> add to t

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Yorick Moko wrote: > On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Onen wrote: >> Hi, >> >> ivvmm wrote: >>> I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? >> This brings three questions: >> 1. if you have big HPV-Dops, your position is not very precise. If you >> add to this that you

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:13 PM, Onen wrote: > Hi, > > ivvmm wrote: >> I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? > > This brings three questions: > 1. if you have big HPV-Dops, your position is not very precise. If you > add to this that you have a high speed, then w

Re: cellhunter --- the state of development and future

Hi, ivvmm wrote: > I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? I am working on a similar project openBmap[1]. A thread has been started by Stefan from FSO about the state of the collaboration between the projects [2][3]. I am for collaboration and even for merge at l

cellhunter --- the state of development and future

I wonder how quick is it developed and how much people are involved in? In fact no one in my country is using it(looked at the map on cellhunter's site). By also looking at the map we can see that many regions are already covered. So when the next steps will be taken? I mean integrating the abilit