Re: phonefsod: duplicates frameworkd configurations?
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010, arne anka wrote: > looking into phonefsod.conf i see, that it duplicates already existing fso > configuration: > - brighness > - dim > - idle_screen > - suspend > none of the above strikes me as especially particular to the _phone_ > functionality -- in fact, imo they heavily interfere with settings made > elsewhere in frameworkd.conf or rules.yaml and being applied to the device > as a whole. > why tries a _phone_ daemon to handle stuff common to the overall > functionality? nothing actually duplicated. We are just trying to move away from oeventsd... so there is stuff that was in rules.yaml (the suspend handling) - nothing though from frameworkd.conf. -- Klaus 'mrmoku' Kurzmann ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: phonefsod: duplicates frameworkd configurations?
> Such questions about SHR apps should be asked on the shr-devel > mailinglist, sounds good in theory -- in praxis it means to subscribe to yet another list just to pose a few question once in a very long while, but getting a lot of mails i am not interested in. > As far as i know phonefsod does these things because FSO doesn't handle > it correctly. So until it's working correctly in FSO this is done in > phonefsod too. assuming that enough shr developers are reading this list: - is the fso default handling disabled then? - i'd prefer a switch "let phonefsod handle the following stuff [y/n]" ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: phonefsod: duplicates frameworkd configurations?
Am Sonntag 10 Januar 2010 16:35:24 schrieb arne anka: > looking into phonefsod.conf i see, that it duplicates already existing fso > configuration: > - brighness > - dim > - idle_screen > - suspend > > none of the above strikes me as especially particular to the _phone_ > functionality -- in fact, imo they heavily interfere with settings made > elsewhere in frameworkd.conf or rules.yaml and being applied to the device > as a whole. > > why tries a _phone_ daemon to handle stuff common to the overall > functionality? Such questions about SHR apps should be asked on the shr-devel mailinglist, because half of the authors of phonefsod aren't reading this ML. As far as i know phonefsod does these things because FSO doesn't handle it correctly. So until it's working correctly in FSO this is done in phonefsod too. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
phonefsod: duplicates frameworkd configurations?
looking into phonefsod.conf i see, that it duplicates already existing fso configuration: - brighness - dim - idle_screen - suspend none of the above strikes me as especially particular to the _phone_ functionality -- in fact, imo they heavily interfere with settings made elsewhere in frameworkd.conf or rules.yaml and being applied to the device as a whole. why tries a _phone_ daemon to handle stuff common to the overall functionality? ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
