Re: qtmoko v27

2010-10-04 Thread Gand'
Oh, that's true, i didn't paid attention to that ...
It's a relief ^^
-- 
  Gand'

On Sun, Oct 3, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Ole Carlsen o...@carlsen-web.dk wrote:

 Den 03-10-2010 14:08, Gand' skrev:
  Since i moved to the v27, my touchscreen is kind of weird ... I can't
  draw a straight line, and when i keep the stylus on the screen, it draws
  a tiny star (more or less 9mm²) It makes the docked keyboard pretty
  unusable as when press a key, one of the surrounding key often responds
 ...
  --
 Gand'

 That was also one of the things that Radek mentioned when releasing it:

 --
 I have been testing 2.6.34 kernel for one week now and to me it looks ok.
 There can be issues with SD card [6], the touchscreen driver is missing
 filtering so it's a bit jittery and i think accelerometers are somehow
 strange now.
 --

 As a work-around, for the keyboard, I have rotated my screen 90 degrees
 and now I don't hit the wrong key very often anymore. I would though
 prefer the possibility to personally decide the size of my keyboard.

 --
 Ole @ Carlsen-web.dk

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-10-03 Thread Gand'
Since i moved to the v27, my touchscreen is kind of weird ... I can't draw a
straight line, and when i keep the stylus on the screen, it draws a tiny
star (more or less 9mm²) It makes the docked keyboard pretty unusable as
when press a key, one of the surrounding key often responds ...
-- 
  Gand'

On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 11:52 AM, Patryk Benderz patryk.bend...@esp.plwrote:

 [cut]
  Also it can compare only system clock with RTC, so we always assume that
  system time is correct. Calypso time - do we need it at all?
 Maybe to correct drifting RTC?
 --
 Patryk LeadMan Benderz
 Linux Registered User #377521
 ()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail
 /\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-10-03 Thread Ole Carlsen
Den 03-10-2010 14:08, Gand' skrev:
 Since i moved to the v27, my touchscreen is kind of weird ... I can't
 draw a straight line, and when i keep the stylus on the screen, it draws
 a tiny star (more or less 9mm²) It makes the docked keyboard pretty
 unusable as when press a key, one of the surrounding key often responds ...
 --
Gand'

That was also one of the things that Radek mentioned when releasing it:

--
I have been testing 2.6.34 kernel for one week now and to me it looks ok.
There can be issues with SD card [6], the touchscreen driver is missing
filtering so it's a bit jittery and i think accelerometers are somehow 
strange now.
--

As a work-around, for the keyboard, I have rotated my screen 90 degrees 
and now I don't hit the wrong key very often anymore. I would though 
prefer the possibility to personally decide the size of my keyboard.

-- 
Ole @ Carlsen-web.dk

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27 (+ answering usability)

2010-09-28 Thread Thomas HOCEDEZ
 Le 27/09/2010 19:08, Alfa21 a écrit :
 2010-09...@17:32 Thomas HOCEDEZ

 and go to the dial interface
 I can confirm this.




 ooh! great, you remembered to me an annoying usability issue about the answer 
 screen:

 when I'm in a hurry or I'm walking sometimes I push the answer button twice 
 due to the latency of the gui just because I've an vibrating touch... and 
 actually I drop the incoming call :P

 is it possible to split the button in 2 so it's not the same area active on 
 the screen to do both the functions?

 ...or just reduce the size of the button and move it from left to right 
 accordingly to its active function of the moment?

 ...or substitute the button with a slide? (in this way I also do not answer 
 while I'm grabbing it out of my poket)

Yes it might be done in the Theme, I'll put it in the final release
thanks for this idea !

-- 
Thomas HOCEDEZ


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-28 Thread Patryk Benderz
[cut]
 Also it can compare only system clock with RTC, so we always assume that 
 system time is correct. Calypso time - do we need it at all?
Maybe to correct drifting RTC?
-- 
Patryk LeadMan Benderz
Linux Registered User #377521
()  ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail 
/\  www.asciiribbon.org   - against proprietary attachments


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-27 Thread Thomas HOCEDEZ
 Le 25/09/2010 10:53, Radek Polak a écrit :
 Hi,
 new experimintal qtmoko-v27 with 2.6.34 kernel is out now. You can download 
 it 
 from our sourceforge page [1]

 Qtmoko is distribution based on debian+qtopia, for more info see [2][3][4].

 Changes from latest v26 stable release:

 * New 2.6.34 kernel [5]
 * GPRS fixes (Alex Samorukov and Pierre)
 * Alarm fixes (Alex Samorukov)
 * Using devtmpfs for faster boot and more memory

 For new kernel credits go to Gennady Kupava, Lars-Peter Clausen and  
 Thibaut Girka. Lars for porting to newer versions and upstreaming, Gena for 
 help with the power consumption bug, fixing WS problems and being nice to 
 help 
 anytime, Thibaut for upstreaming and blanking fix.

 I have been testing 2.6.34 kernel for one week now and to me it looks ok. 
 There can be issues with SD card [6], the touchscreen driver is missing 
 filtering so it's a bit jittery and i think accelerometers are somehow 
 strange 
 now.

 Please report if you find any other regressions against 2.6.29. Otherwise i 
 will probably switch to 2.6.34 as stable kernel in next releases.

 As for GPRS - it should work again and a bit better. However we still 
 probably 
 need better multiplexing - plan is to use kernel gsm multiplexer.

 Alarm now uses RTC_WKALM and instead of deprecated RTC_ALM and we no longer 
 build with BROKEN_RTC_ALARM which could cause random wakeup at night.

 In the end i have decided to use devtmpfs as default /dev manager. You can 
 easily switch back to udev by just apt-get install udev.

 I hope i havent missed anything. Please report mainly regressions again v26 
 version. For me this version is good enough for daily use - i hope same will 
 be for you.

 Regards

 Radek


 [1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/Experimental/
 [2] http://qtmoko.org/
 [3] http://activationrecord.net/radekp/qtmoko/
 [4] http://github.com/radekp
 [5] http://github.com/radekp/linux-2.6/tree/qtmoko-v27
 [6] http://www.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/1143

 ___
 Openmoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
As usual it roxxes ! But there is always this strange bug : when you
change theme, and go to the dial interface, the phone restarts (not
reboot : restarts ie : gfx, modem, usb ...)

For the V27, i'm preparing also a new theme.

Rgds.

-- 
Thomas HOCEDEZ


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27 (+ answering usability)

2010-09-27 Thread Alfa21
2010-09...@17:32 Thomas HOCEDEZ

 and go to the dial interface

I can confirm this.




ooh! great, you remembered to me an annoying usability issue about the answer 
screen:

when I'm in a hurry or I'm walking sometimes I push the answer button twice due 
to the latency of the gui just because I've an vibrating touch... and actually 
I drop the incoming call :P

is it possible to split the button in 2 so it's not the same area active on the 
screen to do both the functions?

...or just reduce the size of the button and move it from left to right 
accordingly to its active function of the moment?

...or substitute the button with a slide? (in this way I also do not answer 
while I'm grabbing it out of my poket)

-- 
ALFA21 IS PROVIDED AS IS AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR 
IMPLIED.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-26 Thread Alex Samorukov
On 09/25/2010 10:45 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:
 Alex Samorukovm...@os2.kiev.ua  writes:

 Thank you for update. How did you measure this drift? Anyway, i don`t
  
 With http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/openmoko/compare-clock-sources.pl

Thanks.

Also it can compare only system clock with RTC, so we always assume that 
system time is correct. Calypso time - do we need it at all?

I think right scenario is to get ntptime (slow op), and then - RTC + 
system, and compare them. Not sure that system clock is really accurate :)

 hwclock changes are not important for qtmoko, because rtc driver
 controls /dev/rtc elusively (its very easy to change, but i don`t
 think that it needs to be changed).
  
 Hmm, what driver is that in qtmoko btw?

Not driver, daemon. atd from qpe.
 Thank you, need to check. If it is - then its a serious argument
 against this change. Do you know any other syslogd with in-memory
 buffer?
  
 How about just using normal syslogd with tmpfs as storage?

It will not do circular buffer then.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-26 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Alex Samorukov m...@os2.kiev.ua writes:
 With http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/openmoko/compare-clock-sources.pl

 Also it can compare only system clock with RTC, so we always assume

compare-clock-sources.pl compares

1) GPS to system time
2) GPS to pcf time
3) GPS to calypso time.

It does not compare system time with RTC.

 Calypso time - do we need it at all?

Probably not since it is reset so easily.

 It will not do circular buffer then.

Log rotation should do that?


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Radek Polak
Hi,
new experimintal qtmoko-v27 with 2.6.34 kernel is out now. You can download it 
from our sourceforge page [1]

Qtmoko is distribution based on debian+qtopia, for more info see [2][3][4].

Changes from latest v26 stable release:

* New 2.6.34 kernel [5]
* GPRS fixes (Alex Samorukov and Pierre)
* Alarm fixes (Alex Samorukov)
* Using devtmpfs for faster boot and more memory

For new kernel credits go to Gennady Kupava, Lars-Peter Clausen and  
Thibaut Girka. Lars for porting to newer versions and upstreaming, Gena for 
help with the power consumption bug, fixing WS problems and being nice to help 
anytime, Thibaut for upstreaming and blanking fix.

I have been testing 2.6.34 kernel for one week now and to me it looks ok. 
There can be issues with SD card [6], the touchscreen driver is missing 
filtering so it's a bit jittery and i think accelerometers are somehow strange 
now.

Please report if you find any other regressions against 2.6.29. Otherwise i 
will probably switch to 2.6.34 as stable kernel in next releases.

As for GPRS - it should work again and a bit better. However we still probably 
need better multiplexing - plan is to use kernel gsm multiplexer.

Alarm now uses RTC_WKALM and instead of deprecated RTC_ALM and we no longer 
build with BROKEN_RTC_ALARM which could cause random wakeup at night.

In the end i have decided to use devtmpfs as default /dev manager. You can 
easily switch back to udev by just apt-get install udev.

I hope i havent missed anything. Please report mainly regressions again v26 
version. For me this version is good enough for daily use - i hope same will 
be for you.

Regards

Radek


[1] https://sourceforge.net/projects/qtmoko/files/Experimental/
[2] http://qtmoko.org/
[3] http://activationrecord.net/radekp/qtmoko/
[4] http://github.com/radekp
[5] http://github.com/radekp/linux-2.6/tree/qtmoko-v27
[6] http://www.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/1143

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Gennady Kupava
Hi, Radek.

 I have been testing 2.6.34 kernel for one week now and to me it looks ok. 
 There can be issues with SD card [6],

 [6] http://www.shr-project.org/trac/ticket/1143


About this issue: here, recompiling shr-2.6.32 kernel, i can reproduce
problems with sd-card. For example i have to recheck my xfs filesystem
after _each_ time i mount it with shr's kernel. Contrary to this, my .34
which is very close to your version, never had any problems with sd card
- boot from sd, mounting my xfses, suspending and powering down/up cycle
is perfectly ok for last several months (from point of view of sd card).

My wild guess that SHR's sd-card problems somehow related to kms
changes.

Gennady.


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Alex Samorukov
Hi Radek,

Thank you for working on the project.

About alarm fixes:

could you please add RTC sync on every suspend to the sources? It is 
*very important* to make it synced before suspend, because if they are 
not in sync - phone will wake up in the wrong time. I will send you the 
patch.

Another things i`m working on:

1) GPRS/Voice fixes: fix wrong modem id processing inside NEO modem 
driver.  Issue affecting not only GPRS but also multiply concurrent 
calls (using hold or conferences). If there is someone on the list 
familiar with Qtopia sources - please contact me, i`m not sure if i`m 
doing right.

2) Syslogd replacement with debian`s busybox.  Its already works for me, 
i will try to send patches tomorrow.

3) GPRS on demand mode. I already fixed the main issue (hangup on 
start), but found that it works very unreliable because of 1).

P.S. If someone have a cheap GTA02 (e.g. with broken LCD screen or case) 
then i`ll be glad to buy it - its hard to do too much experiments on 
every-day phone :)

On 09/25/2010 10:53 AM, Radek Polak wrote:
 Hi,
 new experimintal qtmoko-v27 with 2.6.34 kernel is out now. You can download it
 from our sourceforge page [1]

 Qtmoko is distribution based on debian+qtopia, for more info see [2][3][4].

 Changes from latest v26 stable release:

 * New 2.6.34 kernel [5]
 * GPRS fixes (Alex Samorukov and Pierre)
 * Alarm fixes (Alex Samorukov)
 * Using devtmpfs for faster boot and more memory

 For new kernel credits go to Gennady Kupava, Lars-Peter Clausen and
 Thibaut Girka. Lars for porting to newer versions and upstreaming, Gena for
 help with the power consumption bug, fixing WS problems and being nice to help
 anytime, Thibaut for upstreaming and blanking fix.




___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Gennady Kupava
В Сбт, 25/09/2010 в 21:38 +0200, Alex Samorukov пишет:

 2) Syslogd replacement with debian`s busybox.  Its already works for me, 
 i will try to send patches tomorrow.

Why?

Gennady


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Alex Samorukov
On 09/25/2010 08:41 PM, Gennady Kupava wrote:
 В Сбт, 25/09/2010 в 21:38 +0200, Alex Samorukov пишет:


 2) Syslogd replacement with debian`s busybox.  Its already works for me,
 i will try to send patches tomorrow.
  
 Why?

I`m using memory buffer for logging and it makes my flash and NAND 
memory happy :)

If i need persystent logging i can always do

busybox logger -f  /var/log/messages

Or just busybox logger  /tmp/log if you need las buffer length.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Alex Samorukov m...@os2.kiev.ua writes:
 could you please add RTC sync on every suspend to the sources? It is 
 *very important* to make it synced before suspend, because if they are 
 not in sync - phone will wake up in the wrong time. I will send you the 
 patch.

At least here the RTC drifts so fast (6 seconds per hour) that I don't
even try to keep it in sync. Instead I predict what the RTC will read
at a given time using a simple linear model. I sent a patch to add
--predict option to hwclock and upstream included it some time this
year.

 2) Syslogd replacement with debian`s busybox.  Its already works for me, 
 i will try to send patches tomorrow.

Note that busybox syslog silently truncates long lines (debian bug
#519356).

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Alex Samorukov
On 09/25/2010 09:53 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote:

 At least here the RTC drifts so fast (6 seconds per hour) that I don't
 even try to keep it in sync. Instead I predict what the RTC will read
 at a given time using a simple linear model. I sent a patch to add
 --predict option to hwclock and upstream included it some time this
 year.


Thank you for update. How did you measure this drift? Anyway, i don`t 
see that its a big issue. E.g. i have a daily alarm set, so in a worst 
case (phone was in a standby mode, no calls/sms`s) i will wakeup 3 
minutes later :) If phone will wake up 3 minutes before than its also 
not a problem - on a standby alarm will be setup again, so it will just 
wake up 3 minutes later.

hwclock changes are not important for qtmoko, because rtc driver 
controls /dev/rtc elusively (its very easy to change, but i don`t think 
that it needs to be changed).
 Note that busybox syslog silently truncates long lines (debian bug
 #519356).

Thank you, need to check. If it is - then its a serious argument against 
this change. Do you know any other syslogd with in-memory buffer?



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: qtmoko v27

2010-09-25 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Alex Samorukov m...@os2.kiev.ua writes:
 Thank you for update. How did you measure this drift? Anyway, i don`t

With http://lindi.iki.fi/lindi/openmoko/compare-clock-sources.pl

 see that its a big issue. E.g. i have a daily alarm set, so in a worst
 case (phone was in a standby mode, no calls/sms`s) i will wakeup 3
 minutes later :) If phone will wake up 3 minutes before than its also
 not a problem - on a standby alarm will be setup again, so it will
 just wake up 3 minutes later.

Yes it's not a big issue in that scenario. I just needed more accurate
alarms myself :-)

 hwclock changes are not important for qtmoko, because rtc driver
 controls /dev/rtc elusively (its very easy to change, but i don`t
 think that it needs to be changed).

Hmm, what driver is that in qtmoko btw?

 Thank you, need to check. If it is - then its a serious argument
 against this change. Do you know any other syslogd with in-memory
 buffer?

How about just using normal syslogd with tmpfs as storage?


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community