Ryan Prior wrote:
This really shows how little the OpenMoko community understands the
Neo. Why port Windows Mobile when we could be porting Windows 3.1?
Windows 3.1 is a lightweight OS which has excellent application
support from a broad and stable base of industry, and which has
successors whic
On 4/1/08, Joe Pfeiffer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Paolo Cavallini writes:
> >Vincent ha scritto:
> >
> >> Excellent! While I thought the Neo was an excellent device, I didn't
> >> quite like the openness of the OS. You know, it adds security risks and
> >> stuff.
> >
> >??
>
>
> Congratulation
Paolo Cavallini writes:
>Vincent ha scritto:
>
>> Excellent! While I thought the Neo was an excellent device, I didn't
>> quite like the openness of the OS. You know, it adds security risks and
>> stuff.
>
>??
Congratulations -- you got one!
___
Openmok
ROTFLMAO!
Ryan Prior wrote:
This really shows how little the OpenMoko community understands the
Neo. Why port Windows Mobile when we could be porting Windows 3.1?
Windows 3.1 is a lightweight OS which has excellent application
support from a broad and stable base of industry, and which has
Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: support win mobile
When do the NDAs get shipped out, so community members can get
authorized to work on software for the Freerunner?
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 12:06 PM, Pietro m0nt0 Montorfano
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tilman Baumann h
ROTFL!
John Lee wrote:
Dear Community,
A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
customers the maximum freedom in choosing whatever platform they want,
even the close source ones. We will make necessary
It's about time this decision has been made. I'm sick and tired of
having all this source code lying around. I feel much better if it's
all taken care of by someone else.
When do the NDAs get shipped out, so community members can get
authorized to work on software for the Freerunner?
On Tue, Apr
Tilman Baumann ha scritto:
[snip]
Check your calendar. ;)
Noticed something? April, first, ...
Tilman
OMG, i was just waiting for it, it's very beautiful and easy to use,
highly customizable,.
I was planning to buy a GTA03 instead of a GTA02 i hope that you are
serious regarding the GTA
note the date
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 10:42 AM, Paolo Cavallini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Vincent ha scritto:
>
> > Excellent! While I thought the Neo was an excellent device, I didn't
> > quite like the openness of the OS. You know, it adds security risks and
> > stuff.
>
> ??
> --
> Paolo Cav
Paolo Cavallini wrote:
Vincent ha scritto:
Excellent! While I thought the Neo was an excellent device, I didn't
quite like the openness of the OS. You know, it adds security risks and
stuff.
??
Check your calendar. ;)
Noticed something? April, first, ...
Tilman
__
Hmm. You don't like the openness of the OS? Can you elaborate why?
It's the openness of the OS and underlying hardware that allows to
have inventive uses for this device ...
And as regards security: if there is anything I learned from the likes
of Bruce Schneier, it's to distrust anything not open
Vincent ha scritto:
> Excellent! While I thought the Neo was an excellent device, I didn't
> quite like the openness of the OS. You know, it adds security risks and
> stuff.
??
--
Paolo Cavallini, see: http://www.faunalia.it/pc
Noi ci troviamo con parecchie difficoltà con NGI http://www.ngi.it/
Ryan Prior wrote:
This really shows how little the OpenMoko community understands the
Neo. Why port Windows Mobile when we could be porting Windows 3.1?
Windows 3.1 is a lightweight OS which has excellent application
support from a broad and stable base of industry, and which has
successors whic
On Tue, Apr 1, 2008 at 5:09 PM, Ian Darwin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> John Lee wrote:
> > Dear Community,
> >
> > A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
> > Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
> > customers the maximum freedom in choosi
John Lee wrote:
Dear Community,
A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
customers the maximum freedom in choosing whatever platform they want,
even the close source ones. We will make necessary modificati
This really shows how little the OpenMoko community understands the
Neo. Why port Windows Mobile when we could be porting Windows 3.1?
Windows 3.1 is a lightweight OS which has excellent application
support from a broad and stable base of industry, and which has
successors which we know to be of e
On Tuesday 01 April 2008 07:05, John Lee wrote:
> Dear Community,
>
> A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
> Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
> customers the maximum freedom in choosing whatever platform they want,
> even the close source
On 4/1/08, John Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Dear Community,
>
> A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
> Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
> customers the maximum freedom in choosing whatever platform they want,
> even the close sourc
Dear Community,
A decision has been made _today_ that Openmoko is going to support
Windows mobile. We, the distribution team, want to provide our
customers the maximum freedom in choosing whatever platform they want,
even the close source ones. We will make necessary modifications to
wine, thus
19 matches
Mail list logo
