On 5/15/08, Lasse Poulsen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:22:51 -0700
> "Ron K. Jeffries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Is it too much to hope that we'll have access to something similar to
>> how Ubuntu installations are upgraded and updated with fixes?
>
> There is a package
On Thu, 15 May 2008 09:22:51 -0700
"Ron K. Jeffries" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not a developer, but at some point I WILL own a Freerunner.
Please remember that what you're doing is like taking a car that
haven't been test driven out on the open road!
>
> Is it too much to hope that we'l
Ron, I'm sure you know the difference, but your email allows me to
amplify a point that often seems misunderstood:
There is no hardware distinction between a "developer" and a
"non-developer" Freerunner. All Freerunners can be updated the same way.
This distinction is important because many o
There is a package manager already: ipkg. I don't know if it
auto-updates. But it works perfectly fine for installing third-party
apps. I built an app, packaged it, and loaded it onto my virtual Neo
(under qemu) easily with the developer's framework.
-Steven
On Thu, May 15, 2008 at 11:22 AM, R
Ron K. Jeffries schrieb:
> Will we have some package system a la .deb or .rpm models?
As a startingpoint to read through the wiki I recomend something like
that: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Ipkg
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.op
I am not a developer, but at some point I WILL own a Freerunner.
Is it too much to hope that we'll have access to something similar to how
Ubuntu installations are upgraded and updated with fixes?
My guess is that sort of system is not in the DNA of the core
OpenMoko team. That's not a dis, it ju
6 matches
Mail list logo
