Re: RSS feed for changelog of stable in git - Was: Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
Olivier Berger wrote: Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? is the git log helps you? http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=log;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable Great. Would it be possible to have GITweb upgraded / patched (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11378.html maybe) so that RSS feeds can be output for heads ? Something like http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable would definitely rock... but at the moment it only gives the same thing as http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss :( I've hacked something quickly (using http://bent.latency.net/git2rss as a base) to produce such an RSS feed : http://www.olivierberger.com/openmoko-200808-stable.xml Btw, looks like some systematic bug # in the changelog of commits made to git would reassure us on the contents of the stable updates ;) Any comments welcome. Best regards, Nice :) ... and thanks. Sarton ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
RSS feed for changelog of stable in git - Was: Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? is the git log helps you? http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=log;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable Great. Would it be possible to have GITweb upgraded / patched (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11378.html maybe) so that RSS feeds can be output for heads ? Something like http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable would definitely rock... but at the moment it only gives the same thing as http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss :( I've hacked something quickly (using http://bent.latency.net/git2rss as a base) to produce such an RSS feed : http://www.olivierberger.com/openmoko-200808-stable.xml Btw, looks like some systematic bug # in the changelog of commits made to git would reassure us on the contents of the stable updates ;) Any comments welcome. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Well, actually, I had a network problem, and made a false assumption on that. opkg does indeed upgrade now the network is configured OK. I'm puzzled... How is one supposed to upgrade from the initial 2008.8 ? re-flash the daily built stable ? I suppose the upgrade path is clear, then : opkg update + opkg upgrade with feeds from [3]. Sorry about bothering. Still, this may be helpful though : Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? I'll try and update the wiki unless someone's quicker in doing so. Best regards, Hi Olivier, Thanks for your work :-) is the git log helps you? http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=log;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable Best Regards, -Ju1ian ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:06:07AM +0200, Olivier Berger wrote: Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? is the git log helps you? http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=log;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable Great. Would it be possible to have GITweb upgraded / patched (http://www.gelato.unsw.edu.au/archives/git/0511/11378.html maybe) so that RSS feeds can be output for heads ? Something like http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable would definitely rock... but at the moment it only gives the same thing as http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=rss :( Many thanks in advance. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Community, As I mentioned in the previous mail[1] , we did some works. [1]:http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/026491.html Thanks for this update. *) A new 2008.8 stable image Holger did some changes in ASU-stable branch. We built it and put on downloads.openmoko.org.[2] [2]http://downloads.openmoko.org/releases/Om2008.8-update/ Oh, it's daily build. *) The repository of 2008.8 After the building process complete, we also sync the repository[3] People can upgrade from there. [3] http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ I think I don't understand very well the situation... and need some clarification concerning updates from the initial 2008.8 image : Is this [3] repository supposed to bring updates over the first 2008.8 stable image ? (It seems it was already there in my opkg config having used this feed already over the 2008.8 install ..., and nothing seems updated so far when doing opkg update; opkg -test upgrade) From your description, it looks like the [2] and [3] are in sync ... so I wonder what the difference would be between the the initial 2008.8 and this new one [2]... I'm puzzled... How is one supposed to upgrade from the initial 2008.8 ? re-flash the daily built stable ? Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? Thanks in advance if you can clarify these points. Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ? - Was: Re: Repository and Images
Olivier Berger [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi Community, As I mentioned in the previous mail[1] , we did some works. [1]:http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/community/2008-August/026491.html Thanks for this update. *) A new 2008.8 stable image Holger did some changes in ASU-stable branch. We built it and put on downloads.openmoko.org.[2] [2]http://downloads.openmoko.org/releases/Om2008.8-update/ Oh, it's daily build. so I wonder what the difference would be between the the initial 2008.8 and this new one [2]... I'm puzzled... How is one supposed to upgrade from the initial 2008.8 ? re-flash the daily built stable ? Is there a changelog of bugs fixed somewhere ? Responding to myself (in part) concerning the changelog between the two image releases. I did a diff against the opkg /usr/lib/opkg/status files in each image and compared the packages reported with different versions. Here's the list of packages which changed versions between Om2008.8-gta02-20080808.rootfs.tar.gz and 20080826-asu-stable-rootfs.tar.gz just downloaded (versions excluded from that list as my diff wasn't easily tweaked to show both packages and versions) : angstrom-version e-wm exquisite exquisite-themes hal illume illume-theme kernel kernel-2.6.24 kernel-image-2.6.24 kernel-module-aes-generic kernel-module-af-key kernel-module-ah4 kernel-module-ah6 kernel-module-aircable kernel-module-airprime kernel-module-anubis kernel-module-arc4 kernel-module-ark3116 kernel-module-as-iosched kernel-module-asix kernel-module-autofs4 kernel-module-belkin-sa kernel-module-berry-charge kernel-module-blowfish kernel-module-bsd-comp kernel-module-camellia kernel-module-cast5 kernel-module-cast6 kernel-module-catc kernel-module-cdc-acm kernel-module-cdc-ether kernel-module-cdc-subset kernel-module-cdrom kernel-module-cfq-iosched kernel-module-cls-basic kernel-module-cls-fw kernel-module-cls-route kernel-module-cls-rsvp kernel-module-cls-rsvp6 kernel-module-cls-tcindex kernel-module-cls-u32 kernel-module-cn kernel-module-configfs kernel-module-cp2101 kernel-module-crc-ccitt kernel-module-crc16 kernel-module-crc32c kernel-module-crypto-null kernel-module-cs89x0 kernel-module-cyberjack kernel-module-cypress-m8 kernel-module-deflate kernel-module-digi-acceleport kernel-module-dm-crypt kernel-module-dm-mod kernel-module-dm-snapshot kernel-module-dm9601 kernel-module-ebt-802-3 kernel-module-ebt-among kernel-module-ebt-arp kernel-module-ebt-arpreply kernel-module-ebt-dnat kernel-module-ebt-ip kernel-module-ebt-limit kernel-module-ebt-log kernel-module-ebt-mark kernel-module-ebt-mark-m kernel-module-ebt-pkttype kernel-module-ebt-redirect kernel-module-ebt-snat kernel-module-ebt-stp kernel-module-ebt-ulog kernel-module-ebt-vlan kernel-module-ebtable-broute kernel-module-ebtable-filter kernel-module-ebtable-nat kernel-module-ebtables kernel-module-ecb kernel-module-empeg kernel-module-esp4 kernel-module-esp6 kernel-module-fcrypt kernel-module-firmware-class kernel-module-ftdi-sio kernel-module-funsoft kernel-module-fuse kernel-module-garmin-gps kernel-module-gf128mul kernel-module-gl620a kernel-module-gpio-keys kernel-module-hp4x kernel-module-io-edgeport kernel-module-io-ti kernel-module-iowarrior kernel-module-ip-gre kernel-module-ip-tables kernel-module-ip6-tables kernel-module-ip6-tunnel kernel-module-ip6t-ah kernel-module-ip6t-eui64 kernel-module-ip6t-frag kernel-module-ip6t-hbh kernel-module-ip6t-hl kernel-module-ip6t-ipv6header kernel-module-ip6t-log kernel-module-ip6t-mh kernel-module-ip6t-owner kernel-module-ip6t-reject kernel-module-ip6t-rt kernel-module-ip6table-filter kernel-module-ip6table-mangle kernel-module-ipaq kernel-module-ipcomp kernel-module-ipcomp6 kernel-module-ipip kernel-module-ipt-addrtype kernel-module-ipt-ah kernel-module-ipt-clusterip kernel-module-ipt-ecn kernel-module-ipt-iprange kernel-module-ipt-log kernel-module-ipt-masquerade kernel-module-ipt-netmap kernel-module-ipt-owner kernel-module-ipt-redirect kernel-module-ipt-reject kernel-module-ipt-same kernel-module-ipt-tos kernel-module-ipt-ttl kernel-module-ipt-ulog kernel-module-iptable-filter kernel-module-iptable-mangle kernel-module-iptable-nat kernel-module-ipv6 kernel-module-ipw kernel-module-ir-usb - kernel-module-isofs kernel-module-kaweth kernel-module-keyspan kernel-module-keyspan-pda kernel-module-khazad kernel-module-kl5kusb105 kernel-module-kobil-sct kernel-module-leds-s3c24xx kernel-module-libcrc32c kernel-module-loop kernel-module-lrw kernel-module-mcs7830 kernel-module-mct-u232 kernel-module-md4 kernel-module-michael-mic kernel-module-mos7720 kernel-module-mos7840
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
On Sun, 2008-08-17 at 08:56 +0930, Rod Whitby wrote: digger vermont wrote: ... Okay Rod I give up, I tried searching, where are those Bearstech feeds? They are still being built, but the fso-testing feed has images and ipks at: http://shr.bearstech.com/ Others will follow over the next couple of days, and task-openmoko-feed will be built for each too. -- Rod Thanks, digger signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Julian Chu wrote: I am the leader of building stuff. We did a release in 2008.8 then provide a stable feed. Buidhost is a building machine that build many things with AUTOREV. That means everything comes from buildhost is *Unstable* We provide buildhost for the reason that we hopes we can provide latest packages for someone who like fresh. Right now it confused many people, we know that and are going to shut down the http interface. Many people concern about 2008.8 repository. Let me explain what we are going to do. *) Provide three repositories 1) unstable 2) testing 3) stable Thanks for clearing up this problem. BTW, Bearstech have graciously donated a server instance for building FSO images, and have accepted my offer to maintain an autobuilder which builds stable, testing and unstable feeds for the FSO distro. The stable feed builds pinned at the latest milestone commit. The testing feed builds from sane-srcrevs. The unstable feed builds from moko-autorev and fso-autorev. -- Rod ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Julian Chu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Hi, I am the leader of building stuff. We did a release in 2008.8 then provide a stable feed. Buidhost is a building machine that build many things with AUTOREV. That means everything comes from buildhost is *Unstable* We provide buildhost for the reason that we hopes we can provide latest packages for someone who like fresh. Right now it confused many people, we know that and are going to shut down the http interface. Many people concern about 2008.8 repository. Let me explain what we are going to do. SNIP Thanks for this official announcement. I've added a link to it in http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Om_2008.8#Updates Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Hi, in Om 2008.8 all feeds in /etc/opkg/ go to http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ is it ok to use http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200808/MMDD/ as update feed for Om 2008.8 ? if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ? thanks, Harald -- I hope to die ___ _ before I *have* to use Microsoft Word., 0--,|/OOO\ Donald E. Knuth, 02-Oct-2001 in Tuebingen._/ / /OOO\ \ \/OOO\ \ O|// \/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/ Harald Koenig // / \\ \ [EMAIL PROTECTED] ^ ^ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Harald Koenig wrote: in Om 2008.8 all feeds in /etc/opkg/ go to http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ Correct. That is the Om2008.08 feed. is it ok to use http://buildhost.openmoko.org/daily/freerunner/200808/MMDD/ as update feed for Om 2008.8 ? Absolutely not. Buildhost does *not* build ASU/Om2008.08 packages. We're still waiting for the Openmoko build team lead to make a decision to fix this. Building and making public packages that do not match with your latest stable binary image simply doesn't make sense. if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ? http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ There is *no* other feed location for Om2008.08 at the moment, and Openmoko are *not* doing public daily builds of Om2008.08 ... -- Rod (not associated with Openmoko, but with strong opinions on feeds) ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ? http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ There is *no* other feed location for Om2008.08 at the moment, and Openmoko are *not* doing public daily builds of Om2008.08 ... -- Rod (not associated with Openmoko, but with strong opinions on feeds) May I suggest to add that into : http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Om_2008.8#Updates if you feel confident on your opinions ? Best regards, -- Olivier BERGER (OpenPGP: 1024D/B4C5F37F) http://www.olivierberger.com/weblog/ ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Olivier Berger wrote: Rod Whitby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: if not, is there a recommended update feed for Om 2008.8 ? http://downloads.openmoko.org/repository/Om2008.8/ There is *no* other feed location for Om2008.08 at the moment, and Openmoko are *not* doing public daily builds of Om2008.08 ... -- Rod (not associated with Openmoko, but with strong opinions on feeds) May I suggest to add that into : http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Om_2008.8#Updates if you feel confident on your opinions ? The text that is there (There should be some official updates for 2008.8 setup soon, but in the meantime, you'll have to wait.) is correct. I've added a warning about buildhost. I expect that Openmoko will start populating the official Om2008.08 feed with updates as soon as those updates make their way through QA. [Although one might ask why the updates need to go through QA when it is now clear that the release itself happened against the advice of QA ...] -- Rod ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
steve wrote: Rod, Our QA includes community feedback. If we release early particular elements in the community will slam us. We expect that. If we hold back releases, other elements of the community will slam us. So we expect to be slammed no matter what we do. Fun job ehh? Armour plating is required. If you're just going to push stuff out the door whenever you might as well just have the community inform you of any bugs. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
steve wrote: Rod, Our QA includes community feedback. If we release early particular elements in the community will slam us. We expect that. If we hold back releases, other elements of the community will slam us. So we expect to be slammed no matter what we do. Fun job ehh? Armour plating is required. Steve, I have no problem with Openmoko having the sole right and responsibility to determine the time and frequency of updates to the community. That is as it should be. If a community member was more frequently updated packages than what is provided by Openmoko, then they can easily build them themselves. What I do have a problem with is the current situation where buildhost builds a daily feed of updates WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE with the latest Openmoko Om2008.08 released image and which cause major confusion amongst your customer base. http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809 Please fix that ticket. -- Rod ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:39:06 Rod Whitby wrote: What I do have a problem with is the current situation where buildhost builds a daily feed of updates WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE with the latest Openmoko Om2008.08 released image and which cause major confusion amongst your customer base. http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809 Please fix that ticket. You are right, this ticket needs to be fixed and it is on the way. One part of the fix would be to remove the daily feed just now. The invisible part is the consolidation of the build infrastructure. So currently we have buildhost.om.org (probably hosted in germany) and a server in the Taipei office (office). Latency from asia to europe is big and interactive ssh sessions can be funny... the same applies the other way around.. and some more reasons, so we have to decide which server to shutdown...and how to please the related engineers. I'm confident they will sort it out. z. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
Holger Freyther wrote: On Wednesday 13 August 2008 23:39:06 Rod Whitby wrote: What I do have a problem with is the current situation where buildhost builds a daily feed of updates WHICH ARE INCOMPATIBLE with the latest Openmoko Om2008.08 released image and which cause major confusion amongst your customer base. http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809 Please fix that ticket. You are right, this ticket needs to be fixed and it is on the way. One part of the fix would be to remove the daily feed just now. Seriously, now that you have graciously provided a temporary correct daily feed of Om2008.08, I would strongly recommend removing the incorrect one. First, do no harm. The invisible part is the consolidation of the build infrastructure. So currently we have buildhost.om.org (probably hosted in germany) and a server in the Taipei office (office). Latency from asia to europe is big and interactive ssh sessions can be funny... the same applies the other way around.. and some more reasons, so we have to decide which server to shutdown...and how to please the related engineers. I'm confident they will sort it out. Understood. Thanks for letting us know that a decision has been made and it's now just a matter of implementation. -- Rod ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Re: which updates for Om 2008.8 ?
On Thu, Aug 14, 2008 at 10:34:04AM +0930, Rod Whitby wrote: Holger Freyther wrote: http://docs.openmoko.org/trac/ticket/1809 Please fix that ticket. You are right, this ticket needs to be fixed and it is on the way. One part of the fix would be to remove the daily feed just now. Seriously, now that you have graciously provided a temporary correct daily feed of Om2008.08, I would strongly recommend removing the incorrect one. First, do no harm. Understood. Thanks for letting us know that a decision has been made and it's now just a matter of implementation. -- Rod Hi, I am the leader of building stuff. We did a release in 2008.8 then provide a stable feed. Buidhost is a building machine that build many things with AUTOREV. That means everything comes from buildhost is *Unstable* We provide buildhost for the reason that we hopes we can provide latest packages for someone who like fresh. Right now it confused many people, we know that and are going to shut down the http interface. Many people concern about 2008.8 repository. Let me explain what we are going to do. *) Provide three repositories 1) unstable 2) testing 3) stable _unstable_ is most likely the buildhost right now. And then pick up something into _testing_, after it pass QA, it go to stable. *) All repositories are in downloads.openmoko.org No buildhost-http anymore. Both of the building machine (in Germany and Taipei) will sync the their packages to downloads.openmoko.org. More details 2008.8 image come from a branch named *org.openmoko.asu.stable* [1] In the previous work flow, developer commit his change into *org.openmoko.asu.dev* [2], and pick up to *org.openmoko.asu.stable* (if Holger thinks it didn't break anything) to do a full test. Buildhost build packages from org.openmoko.dev [3] [1] http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=shortlog;h=org.openmoko.asu.stable [2] http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=shortlog;h=org.openmoko.asu.dev [3] http://git.openmoko.org/?p=openmoko.git;a=shortlog;h=org.openmoko.dev Right now we are merging back from *org.openmoko.asu.dev* to *org.openmoko.dev*. Developers will work on this branch. The situation is that most people want 2008.8 feed as soon as possible. However, it hard to provide a stable branch right now. I will set the building machine to build _stable feed_ from *org.openmoko.asu.stable*. But it won't forward too fast until we finish the merge-back task. What we are doing *) Setup the building machine to build *org.openmoko.asu.stable* for porviding a 2008.8 feed. *) Merge back from *org.openmoko.asu.dev* to *org.openmoko.dev* Best Regards, -Julian ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
