[MBF] server time-outs

Scott Jibben E-Mail SignatureS... I have one of those questions which really isn’t about Declude or spam but the people here are more likely to have good ideas than anywhere else I can think. We’re running SM 12.x (whatever is the latest version) and the most common client app is Microsoft L

[MBF] Re: why?

I was glad I wasn't drinking anything or I would have made a mess too... :) Brian Thomforde http://www.truckdriver.com "Smarter Drivers...Better Jobs" Providing excellence in Internet recruiting since 1996 763-444-8998 x201 From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:

[MBF] Re: why?

I just spit out my coffee in a fit of extreme laughter :D Linda Pagillo Mail's Best Friend Email: linda.pagi...@mailsbestfriend.com Web: www.mailsbestfriend.com Office: 703.988.3605 x7016 MBF From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf Of Dav

[MBF] Re: why?

What's wrong with comfortable bra's helping control underarm and side spillage from Russia ? I know of several Walmart shoppers that could benefit from such a product. David Barker Mail's Best Friend Email : david.bar...@mailsbestfriend.com Web

[MBF] Re: why?

My pleasure. Linda Pagillo Mail's Best Friend Email: linda.pagi...@mailsbestfriend.com Web: www.mailsbestfriend.com Office: 703.988.3605 x7016 MBF From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf Of Brian Thomforde Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 11:

[MBF] Re: why?

Thanks, I'll keep an eye on it. . Brian Thomforde http://www.truckdriver.com "Smarter Drivers...Better Jobs" Providing excellence in Internet recruiting since 1996 763-444-8998 x201 From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf

[MBF] Re: why?

Brian, you had a misconfiguration in your Declude global.cfg for the Sniffer tests. I fixed it. I also updated your Declude RBLs while I was in there. You should be all set. Please let me know if you see another message where you can see the Sniffer headers like this: X-MessageSniffer-Identifie

[MBF] Re: why?

It looks like Sniffer is triggering, but Declude is possibly not seeing it's score. I will log into your server now and have a look. Stand by. Linda Pagillo Mail's Best Friend Email: linda.pagi...@mailsbestfriend.com Web: www.mailsbestfriend.com Office: 703.988.3605 x7016 MBF From: comm

[MBF] Re: why?

I understand my last question but what about this one? The subject line was "Comfortable bra helps control underarm and side spillage" Email from Russia for a bra gets through? Seems something isn't working to let this through. Date: Fri, 12 Sep 2014 07:01:54 -0700 X-MessageSniffer-Identifie

[MBF] Re: why?

Good morning everyone. Dave is correct. This message made it through because it was whitelisted. I wanted to mention that Sniffer did not give this message a score of 55. The 55 that you see a Sniffer rule code, not the Sniffer score. Each test within Sniffer has a code. For example, the Sniffer co

[MBF] Re: why?

Not sure how I missed the whitelist part. Thanks Brian Thomforde http://www.truckdriver.com "Smarter Drivers...Better Jobs" Providing excellence in Internet recruiting since 1996 763-444-8998 x201 From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.

[MBF] Re: why?

X-Declude-Tests: Whitelisted _ From: community@mailsbestfriend.com [mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On Behalf Of Brian Thomforde Sent: Friday, September 12, 2014 6:32 AM To: community@mailsbestfriend.com Subject: [MBF] why? Why did this message get through? Sniffer gave it a 55

[MBF] why?

Why did this message get through? Sniffer gave it a 55 shouldn't that have sent it to spam? X-MessageSniffer-Identifier: m:\SmarterMail\Spool\proc\work\162627262.eml X-GBUdb-Analysis: 0, 193.251.43.135, Ugly c=0 p=0 Source New X-MessageSniffer-Scan-Result: 55 X-MessageSniffer-Rules: 55-6094186-231