friend.com
Subject: [MBF] Re: FW: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL
Tina, I recognize the naming convention of that spammer. He uses fresh domains,
obeys best practices for matching HELO+MAILFROM+REVDNS and uses clean IP
addresses.
The explanation for what you are seeing is timing: the spa
Subject: [MBF] FW: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL
Pretty much – emails such as this that not only the links in the email but the
sender domain is on the uribl-black and declude logs show there is no check/ or
did not get flagged (There is no mention of it “passing” but rather no mention
2014 4:07 PM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com<mailto:community@mailsbestfriend.com>
Subject: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL
The RHSBL checks the senders domain is this what you are saying is passing ?
On 10/23/2014 1:29 PM, Tina Cline wrote:
#http://www.uribl.com/ (PUBLIC) MB
:51 PM
*To:* community@mailsbestfriend.com
*Subject:* [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL
How have you configured your URIBL?
On 10/23/2014 11:02 AM, Tina Cline wrote:
We are seeing a great deal of emails that should be failing
URIBL-Black. They come through and I verify they are
:community@mailsbestfriend.com] On
Behalf Of David Barker
Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:51 PM
To: community@mailsbestfriend.com
Subject: [MBF] Re: Emails should be failing URIBL
How have you configured your URIBL?
On 10/23/2014 11:02 AM, Tina Cline wrote:
We are seeing a great deal of emails that
How have you configured your URIBL?
On 10/23/2014 11:02 AM, Tina Cline wrote:
We are seeing a great deal of emails that should be failing
URIBL-Black. They come through and I verify they are listed in URIBL
Blacklist, and the Declude log is marking them as passing the test..
I even changed
