Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

Hi, > Am 05.02.2018 um 09:54 schrieb rhn : > > Hi Nikolaus, > > On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:28:20 +0100 > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote: > >> Hi rhn, >> >>> Am 04.02.2018 um 23:40 schrieb rhn : >>> >>> Hi,

Re: [Tinkerphones] [Gta04-owner] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

> Am 05.02.2018 um 16:26 schrieb Andreas Kemnade : > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:01:55 +0100 > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote: > >> Hi all, >> FOSDEM is over and I am leaving for the airport in 10 minutes :( >> >> FOSDEM was an as interesting experience as

Re: [Tinkerphones] [Gta04-owner] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:01:55 +0100 "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote: > Hi all, > FOSDEM is over and I am leaving for the airport in 10 minutes :( > > FOSDEM was an as interesting experience as every time. > Many people to meet, many talks, (too) many topics in > parallel... You

Re: [Tinkerphones] Community Digest, Vol 69, Issue 4

Hi Michael / Nikolaus, A hackathon would definitely be beneficial, I believe. However, I wonder if only one evening will be getting us any closer to any incremental step forward. I can imagine some time will be lost by setting up toolchains and fixing dependencies/versions before things get

Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

On Mon 05 February 2018 09:54:36 rhn wrote: > However, not all hope is > lost, since Purism and Fairphone both have a strong focus on the hardware, > so that could be a meeting point. Purism doesn't even have the copyright and thus the permission to share their schematics! How's that "strong

Re: [Tinkerphones] Community Digest, Vol 69, Issue 4

Hi Niels, > Am 05.02.2018 um 16:33 schrieb Niels Heyvaert : > > Hi Michael / Nikolaus, > > A hackathon would definitely be beneficial, I believe. However, I wonder if > only one evening will be getting us any closer to any incremental step > forward. I can imagine

Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

On Mon 05 February 2018 16:45:17 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > Well, from public perception they are both "phone manufacturers". Even if > they don't have their own fab. But that is very common. FIC did produce for > OpenMoko. Not exactly. Openmoko used a FIC facility (incl workers) to run their

Re: [Tinkerphones] [OHSW.org] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

On Mon 05 February 2018 17:28:23 Dorota Czaplejewicz wrote: > Hello Joerg, > > while I cannot speak for the laptop team, in the phone project, we want to > get the hardware right and we go out of our way to achieve this. It > complicates matters a lot, because we want to do it the way barely

Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

Hi rhn, > Am 04.02.2018 um 23:40 schrieb rhn : > > Hi, > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:01:55 +0100 > "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote: > >> Hi all, >> FOSDEM is over and I am leaving for the airport in 10 minutes :( >> >> FOSDEM was an as

Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

Hi Nikolaus, On Mon, 5 Feb 2018 09:28:20 +0100 "H. Nikolaus Schaller" wrote: > Hi rhn, > > > Am 04.02.2018 um 23:40 schrieb rhn : > > > > Hi, > > > > On Sun, 4 Feb 2018 17:01:55 +0100 > > "H. Nikolaus Schaller"

Re: [Tinkerphones] FOSDEM 2018 and beyond

On Sunday 4. February 2018 17.01.55 H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: > > Anyways, I learned a lot of interesting and useful things for our > projects. E.g. why the FST01 crypto key was developed an > about about the status. And I established a contact to the > developer and gnupg.org. Great to hear