Dear Sami,
> On 7 Dec 2018, at 17:15, Sami Salih wrote:
>
> Thank you very much for this informative reply, I really appreciate what have
> be do in R, however as ex-Head of R at the Telecom regulatory of my
> country I want to see more engagement with policy oprganizations to fill the
> gap
> On Dec 11, 2018, at 03:07 , Benjamin Eshun wrote:
>
> Owen,
>
> This thread is not about a particular policy as community is
> discussing two possible threats to Afrinic PDP and its governance in
> general.
Did I say that it was? If so, please point to it.
> Your obstinacy to discuss
Hi Borg,
On 12/11/18 7:01 PM, Chevalier du Borg wrote:
>
> I mean, **if** AFRINIC obliges it fellow to support a position that may
> be benefit the company (afrinic) against the community. it is corruption.
>
Thank you for clarifying with the **if** ;-)
Yes, from that point of view, it
The argument about conflict is simply non-sensical, since any person holding IP
space on the continent is potentially conflicted in ANY policy through the PDP.
The point of the PDP is to create policies which self-govern the use of
resources by members who hold the resources – that means that
* If OIF were try to put french citizen people on AFRINIC board, your
argument will make sense. It is not. If you have evidence to show it has,
please share and tell us how they benefit from it.
Actually this claim concerns me more than anything and highlights everything I
believe is wrong
Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 18:06, Alan Barrett a
écrit :
>
>
>
> AFRINIC public policy meetings have always been open to all. The policy
> development process even specifies "Anyone may participate via the Internet
> or in person.”
>
This is problem that need to be fix. Only people who will deal
Le mar. 11 déc. 2018 à 11:21, Owen DeLong a écrit :
>
>
> While I have done some work for Larus, I have never been instructed by
> Larus on what opinion I should hold or express.
>
It just happen that you vehement oppose the same policy that they oppose.
And the reason why it problematic is
> On 10 Dec 2018, at 21:47, Chittesh Sham wrote:
>
> Hi Alan,
>
> Thank you for the information. I understand that AFRINIC is very liberal in
> allowing external sponsorship by AFRINIC members for their employees to
> attend AFRINIC meetings and i firmly believe in this as it encourages
Owen,
This thread is not about a particular policy as community is
discussing two possible threats to Afrinic PDP and its governance in
general.
Your obstinacy to discuss and oppose review proposal everywhere and
at any occasions, made me doubt and question your real relationship
with
> On 10 Dec 2018, at 21:32, Ish Sookun wrote:
>
> Are there any published details on the In-Kind Sponsorship [1] for
> AFRINIC events?
We publish the names of all sponsors. In-kind sponsorship is typically from
the local host, and from one or more bandwidth sponsors.
Regards,
Alan
10 matches
Mail list logo
