In message <6fbc0020-6ee7-4e6b-8573-ac5aa52b9...@gmail.com>,
Isabel Odida wrote:
>I know what sparked this story.
If you have something to say, then you have our attention and the floor.
Please proceed.
Regards,
rfg
___
Community-Discuss mailing
I know what sparked this story. Some people have no chill. How convenient
following the last meeting in June. Ok, and then what? What have you benefited?
Sent from my iPhone
> On 4 Dec 2019, at 18:23, Ronald F. Guilmette wrote:
>
> I hope you all will take the time to read and think about the
In message <4d42abea-9bf3-5862-52c9-64db51a59...@gmail.com>,
Sunday Folayan wrote:
>The community has been informed that there is already some internal
>investigations ongoing. We should give AFRINIC the time to get things
>done.
Mr. Folayan,
These matters were first brought to light in the
Hi all,
Le jeudi 5 décembre 2019, Mark Elkins a écrit :
> Totally agree with you Mike. It should have been almost impossible to
> manipulate the non-legacy space -
>
Dear Mark,
...i agree !
yet it happened. In this case (looting of non-legacy space), the RSA has
> meant nothing.
>
As you
I have to agree with this. As shocking and disappointing as the revelations
might be, this makes the most sense to me.
Omo
On Thu, 5 Dec 2019, 20:56 Sunday Folayan, wrote:
> It is a shame that the system was exploited. I did not in anyway suggest
> that the malfeasance be ignored, or that we
It is a shame that the system was exploited. I did not in anyway suggest
that the malfeasance be ignored, or that we should focus only on legacy
space.
The community has been informed that there is already some internal
investigations ongoing. We should give AFRINIC the time to get things
I would be very curious to hear from a legal perspective what - if any - legal
liability AfriNIC has in a situation like this.
The fact is - space has value - and if space is stolen - used for spam or
whatever else - and the reputation of said space is damaged - it’s value
decreases. Now I
I don't disagree with that either.
I am certain AFRINIC are working on this, and I know there will be no
shortage of queries about this from the field, much to our
already-clogged e-mail boxes. I don't want to do the jobs of others; no
one is doing mine for me.
My preferred current focus - your
Totally agree with you Mike. It should have been almost impossible to
manipulate the non-legacy space - yet it happened. In this case (looting
of non-legacy space), the RSA has meant nothing.
On 2019/12/05 14:46, Mike Silber wrote:
Be that as it may - that seems to ignore the fact that there
Completely agree with Sunday.
Mark.
On 5/Dec/19 13:02, Sunday Folayan wrote:
> Isn't it time to address Legacy space issues, specifically ancient
> squatters on spaces meant to develop the Internet in Africa, AfriNIC
> Services and bringing legacy spaces under some form of RSA?
>
> I urge the
Isn't it time to address Legacy space issues, specifically ancient
squatters on spaces meant to develop the Internet in Africa, AfriNIC
Services and bringing legacy spaces under some form of RSA?
I urge the community to think beyond the sensation and let us see how to
help and empower the
11 matches
Mail list logo
