On 12/8/19, 3:33 PM, "Ronald F. Guilmette" wrote:
[...]
> Mr. Vegoda appears to be arguing that
No, I am not making an argument, I am observing that there is a difference in
the way these two RIRs perform this function.
Kind regards,
Leo Vegoda
In message <4d311b9c-2bf1-45a8-bf21-a4dffb989...@icann.org>,
Leo Vegoda wrote:
>... {snipped} ...
Mr. Vegoda appears to be arguing that even if one jumps through all
necessary hoops in order to obtain "researcher" access to the RIPE
data base, one still won't get a full and unredacted copy of
In message <280ebc89-783c-48df-a93e-d8a539a9d...@delong.com>,
Owen DeLong wrote:
> On Dec 6, 2019, at 07:46 , Caleb Olumuyiwa Ogundele
> wrote:
>>Even if you are not familiar with Mauritius law, the EU GDPR which is
>>more popular should tell you the implication of revealing a WHOIS
Owen DeLong wrote:
[...]
> Whois is data that is published generally, so your comments here
> about DPR don’t really apply.
>
> Such WHOIS dumps are available from RIPE, so I don’t think it is a
> GDPR issue at all.
Both AFRINIC and RIPE NCC public database dumps on their FTP sites but the
The best way to empower useful work is to move forward with IPv6.
Owen
> On Dec 5, 2019, at 03:02 , Sunday Folayan wrote:
>
> Isn't it time to address Legacy space issues, specifically ancient squatters
> on spaces meant to develop the Internet in Africa, AfriNIC Services and
> bringing