Hi Eddy
Thanks a lot and noted.
Noah
On Fri, 24 Jun 2022, 22:25 Eddy Kayihura, wrote:
> It will need to follow the Code of Conduct update process.
>
> However, item 4 of the Code of conduct covers part of what you asked in
> our view.
>
> If not, then, let us follow the process of update of
Amin,
PTAs stance on which RIR they allow licenced operators in Pakistan to source
IPs is entirely the business of Pakistan, PTA, and licenced operators in
Pakistan. They have no regulatory powers over Africa, and unless they are a
paid up member of Afrinic, then they have no say or influence
It will need to follow the Code of Conduct update process.
However, item 4 of the Code of conduct covers part of what you asked in our
view.
If not, then, let us follow the process of update of the code of conduct which
we did last year or so including consultations and approval.
--
Kind
Hi,
It is possible to postulate that AFRINIC threw the first punch buy revoking
membership and resource holdings of members who relied upon those resources for
their business.
I'm sure all cases should be judged or mediated based on the applicable law
however. Who hit first or hit back hardest
THANK YOU Eddy for prevailing with a great sense of leadership and wisdom.
The integrity of the organization deserves immense protection.
Regards
Robert Ford
Independent ICT Consultant
EAC ONA & Tech Investments
+250 788504406
Twitter: @robertnford
Skype: robert4dd
Sent from my MacBook Air
