Re: [Community-Discuss] Data protection

2019-07-14 Thread Ish Sookun
Hi SM, On 7/12/19 10:40 PM, S. Moonesamy wrote: > There are cases for which it may be useful to provide a point of > contact.  An alternative to address regulatory requirements could be to > provide the contact information of a role account. Yes, this alternative complies with the DPA. The role

Re: [Community-Discuss] Data protection

2019-07-12 Thread S. Moonesamy
Dear Ish, At 10:24 AM 12-07-2019, Ish Sookun wrote: The email mentions the following: "The Board believes that these regulations are not a barrier to publication of the WHOIS data [..]" and, "The Board further believes that the biggest changes required by AFRINIC are in

[Community-Discuss] Data protection

2019-07-12 Thread S. Moonesamy
Dear Owen, At 05:52 PM 11-07-2019, Owen DeLong wrote: While the fact that Mauritius stupidly (IMHO) signed an agreement making this paragraph problematic, many other nations in Africa have not and so it's again questionable whether the law can be applied to entities outside of AfriNIC that are

[Community-Discuss] Data protection

2019-07-10 Thread S. Moonesamy
Dear Mathieu, At 02:36 AM 10-07-2019, Mathieu Paonessa wrote: Just a quick reminder that many have forgotten: - Réunion and Mayotte are part of the Afrinic service region. Thank you for the reminder. There was a thread in 2018 about data protection [1]. There is ETS 223 [2] which is a