Hi SM,
On 7/12/19 10:40 PM, S. Moonesamy wrote:
> There are cases for which it may be useful to provide a point of
> contact. An alternative to address regulatory requirements could be to
> provide the contact information of a role account.
Yes, this alternative complies with the DPA. The role
Dear Ish,
At 10:24 AM 12-07-2019, Ish Sookun wrote:
The email mentions the following:
"The Board believes that these regulations are not a barrier to
publication of the WHOIS data [..]"
and,
"The Board further believes that the biggest changes required by
AFRINIC are in
Dear Owen,
At 05:52 PM 11-07-2019, Owen DeLong wrote:
While the fact that Mauritius stupidly (IMHO) signed an agreement
making this paragraph problematic, many other nations in Africa have
not and so it's again questionable whether the law can be applied to
entities outside of AfriNIC that are
Dear Mathieu,
At 02:36 AM 10-07-2019, Mathieu Paonessa wrote:
Just a quick reminder that many have forgotten:
- Réunion and Mayotte are part of the Afrinic service region.
Thank you for the reminder.
There was a thread in 2018 about data protection
[1]. There is ETS 223 [2] which is a