Ali
Thanks for highlighting the issues bellow. Some board members have claimed
championing transparency but I think we all need to have the same definition of
the word.
The issue of publishing the minutes was a community mandate to the board not a
board initiative. I also like the issue on
Dear All,
Donald Trump please something similar to Theresa May about internet regulation.
It seems that the world powers are now promoting actions against the internet
freedem. This below piece was published by the independent.co.uk journal - see
the below.
"New international agreements
Andrew
This is noted. However, I stand by my assertions that transparency requires a
public Organisation like Afrinic to publish said reports - redacted or not.
It's imperative that the community understands the goings on in such
interactions. Unless of course Afrinic claims 'National
Hi Ali,
Unfortunately due to constraints on the NDA – I cannot divulge the contents of
the audit-co report – but I would also like these reports published, or at
least, a redacted version of said reports. I could understand why an internal
board report on audit may not be published in its
Mark and all
Let's raise the bar on transparency and proper reporting is super critical.
For example a quick perusal of the Afrinic Website tells me that:-
1. The last minutes posted were in February this year. I see there was another
Board meeting in April which has no minutes posted yet. Can
I agree with you Ali. When Andrew first campaigned to be a Board member,
one of his goals was increased transparency. I believe that he has
helped, with the rest of the Board, achieve this. Transparency though is
an ongoing process and its a pity that Andrew was not re-elected to
continue
Andrew
You raise pertinent and important issues.
The rule of thumb for any public organization is that Transparency trumps (no
pun intended) everything else.
If I were asked and was a member of the Board, I'd advocate for FULL disclosure
on financial and operational matters. How money was
