Dear Lee, Jordi,
Thank you for the responses.
At 02:42 PM 01-07-2019, Lee Howard wrote:
Every study I do is independent, so there's that. :)
The following is closer to what I have seen: '"independent" is not
easy to find, and is not related to a specific region'. For what it
is worth,
By the way another reference, this one specific to 464XLAT:
NAT64/464XLAT Deployment Guidelines in Operator and Enterprise Networks
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-deployment/
This document just ended the last-call, so if nothing is identified as really
broken (apart
Hi SM,
Responding from my own perspective, hopefully is useful.
I think "independent" is not easy to find, and is not related to a specific
region.
But here are some "numbers" based on my own experience (from my customers
networks, so independent on the sense of "not just one case").
This
Dear Lee,
At 08:59 AM 28-06-2019, Lee Howard wrote:
A company can save money on IPv4 addresses and CGN by deploying
IPv6. But it's too late to deploy IPv6 before Afrinic runs out of
addresses. Addresses will run out, and the market will not be able
to satisfy the need for addresses. ISPs and
