Fwd: Apache / mail-archive.com

2004-12-21 Thread Erik Abele
This forum is probably more applicable for these kinds of offers: Begin forwarded message: From: Jeff Breidenbach jeff (at) jab.org Date: 16. Dezember 2004 09:16:49 MEZ Subject: Apache / mail-archive.com ... Also I noticed Apache lists are using our service pretty heavily. That's great - please

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: William A. Rowe, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 17 December 2004 08:42 To: community@apache.org Cc: community@apache.org Subject: RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed At 08:30 PM 12/16/2004, Stephen McConnell wrote: Concerning our decision making processes, I

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: I give you an example of what I call 'compromise' and 'collaboration' ; Those events as you describe them did happen. If they were the only ones, we'd have a happy healthy community. :o) Each individual

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Niclas Hedhman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 04:29 To: community@apache.org; Noel J. Bergman Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: I give you an example of

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 11:19, Stephen McConnell wrote: Greg holds to the opinion that the appointed Chair is the PMC and that the members are simply an artificial construct. Before anyone is requesting the quote where Steve get that notion from;

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 05:05, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Regardless of whether there was any 'right' or 'wrong' position, it appears that there were irreducible differences. I only recall one side expressing a willingness to

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:41, Noel J. Bergman wrote: You seem to keep forgetting that I supported Merlin havine a home at the ASF. Very much appreciated :o) , as I know you normally saw through all the BS that was part of the Avalon stage. Point? That consensus by attrition is a

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Actually, all it takes to veto a change is one PMC member to cast a -1 with a technical justification. The issue is how a community deals with those vetos, and how progress

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:41, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Point? That consensus by attrition is a negatively loaded term, yet a natural occurring thing in all projects (people do leave healthy projects) which is replenished with

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 12:09, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: People leaving a project for J Random Reason is acceptable attrition. People leaving because they don't agree with the majority opinion is, too. A practice of asking people to leave, or trying to drive them away, because they

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 12:02, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:54, Noel J. Bergman wrote: Actually, all it takes to veto a change is one PMC member to cast a -1 with a technical justification. The issue is how a community deals with

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 11:50, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Then you're being uncommonly obtuse obtuse? (is that insult or compliment? otoh getting the true meaning from a dictionary is probably not a good idea :o( ) 'I have a serious reservation about this because it appears to be

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
consensus by attrition is a negatively loaded term, yet a natural occurring thing in all projects Not when the attrition is caused by unhealthy friction and stress within the community, and an active (and stated) goal to remove those who didn't share a particular vision. --- Noel

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 05:10 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 07:41, Noel J. Bergman

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stephen McConnell wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: * What do you think is the role of a PMC in our decision making process? They have absolute decision making process within the board's mandate for their project. According to Greg Stein this should

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Craig McClanahan
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:31:03 +0100, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK - let's play this game but let's do it properly. I've got a better idea ... let's not play the game (any more) at all. The decision was made (and I, as an Apache member, consider it to be in *my* best

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 05:30 To: community@apache.org Subject: RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed consensus by attrition is a negatively loaded term, yet a natural occurring thing in all projects Not when the attrition

Re: [PGP Global Directory] Verify Email Address - what do people think?

2004-12-21 Thread Ben Laurie
Shane Curcuru wrote: Anyone with a PGP key on the pgp.com keyserver likely has gotten one or more of these emails recently. I'm figuring it's legit, see http://www.pgp.com/downloads/beta/globaldirectory/faq.html It is legit. - Any security types have a decent analysis of what the new pgp.com's

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stephen McConnell wrote: If I remember correctly you coined the phrase, and now you are promoting this left right and center presumably as your rationalization of past events. Cut to chase - publish all of this - not just the selected extracts. Actually, I was just checking some of the

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread David Crossley
Niclas Hedhman wrote: Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: Niclas Hedhman wrote: Noel J. Bergman wrote: Actually, all it takes to veto a change is one PMC member to cast a -1 with a technical justification. The issue is how a community deals with those vetos, and how progress can be made

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 20 December 2004 22:16 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: Maybe it's about dealing with the breach of

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Noel J. Bergman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 05:30 To: community@apache.org Subject: RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed Stephen McConnell wrote: William A. Rowe, Jr. wrote: Stephen McConnell wrote: * What do you think is the role of a

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Brian W. Fitzpatrick
On Dec 20, 2004, at 10:39 PM, Craig McClanahan wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:31:03 +0100, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK - let's play this game but let's do it properly. I've got a better idea ... let's not play the game (any more) at all. The decision was made (and I, as an Apache

Re: Fwd: Apache / mail-archive.com

2004-12-21 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Hi Erick: I found it as a very good offer for all the apache mail lists. Will be fine if each project check if they have all the list there: dev, users and svn (cvs or whatever). Having more mail archives around for our apache lists is a good thing. Plus: another backup, diferent search

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Bertrand Delacretaz
Le 21 déc. 04, à 08:21, Brian W. Fitzpatrick a écrit : Take it to alt.talk.wank for crissakes. +1 -Bertrand smime.p7s Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 05:39, Craig McClanahan wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004 05:31:03 +0100, Stephen McConnell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK - let's play this game but let's do it properly. I've got a better idea ... let's not play the game (any more) at all.

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 07:21:09AM +0100, Stephen McConnell wrote: ... a committee should have the ability to remove a chair The PMC lacks the authority to do so. Which is why it was presented as a recommendation! Do you see an inherent problem with the notion of a Chair accountable

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr
On Dec 21, 2004, at 3:23 AM, Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 05:02, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: If there's a reasonable reason, cool. Otherwise, maybe we can move on. There'll be no 'winner' here. But we could proclaim Stephen and Niclas winner. Maybe this thread would end

Avalon RIP

2004-12-21 Thread Sam Ruby
Henning Schmiedehausen wrote: On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 05:02, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: If there's a reasonable reason, cool. Otherwise, maybe we can move on. There'll be no 'winner' here. But we could proclaim Stephen and Niclas winner. Maybe this thread would end then and then we all would

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: The PMC Chair is an ultimate decision maker Please check the bylaws for the normal situation. But -WHEN- things break down, when there is no consensus and there is no clear ability to reach any conclusion and it is in the interest of the foundation

Re: [PGP Global Directory] Verify Email Address - what do people think?

2004-12-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Ben Laurie wrote: The point about this new one is it allows keys that are wrong (i.e. do not belong to the email address) or no longer have private keys available to be expired. Though I kind of dislike that; I intentionally keep older email addresses on my key as in

Requesting clarification in ByLaw text.

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 17:03, Greg Stein wrote: (12:10:11) gstein: mcconnell: aaron *is* the PMC ((12:46:05) gstein: the members of the PMC is an artificial construct created by the Chair You lost a lot of context there. Ok, agree, but I thought it being unnecessary to quote 71kB

Re: Requesting clarification in ByLaw text.

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 20:48, Niclas Hedhman wrote: This whole episode is also marred by Project ByLaw, which I have been told does not to exist (or do they? confusion!), yet is mentioned that the PMC is Sorry, I missed a few words here. Should be; ... yet is mentioned in the Board

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: A practice of asking people to leave, or trying to drive them away, because they don't agree with you is not acceptable. It is a single occurrence in time, and in my book everyone is allowed to make occassional mistakes. You make

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: That FUD is prevalent in ASF establishment, against its own contributors, for unknown reasons, possibly unintentionally, by an unnamed, possibly unknown, person or a group of persons. And that FUD is being amplified by everyone

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: OK - let's play this game but let's do it properly. I don't intend to touch this remark. Open up the Avalon PMC archives and let's really get down to real metal and in the process I think we will clean up more that a couple of

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 20:59, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: No, I don't think it was a single occurrence. *I* only know of one such time, in conjunction with Leo Sutic resigning on the basis of People leaving because they don't agree with the majority opinion is acceptable attrition.

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: Once again, there was no technical breach of procedure. Of custom, perhaps, but not of procedure. This is another dead horse that should stop getting beaten. A set of polices and procedures were established and these procedures

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Niclas Hedhman wrote: BUT, I *would* appreciate if you spent some of your intellect looking at the more important stuff raised in this thread under new Subject. (I don't see any new thread yet.) If the stuff is raised as hypothetical issues, sure. I'll

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 21:39, Rodent of Unusual Size wrote: (I don't see any new thread yet.) Same thread, new Subject Subject = Requesting clarification in ByLaw text. -- +--//---+ / http://www.dpml.net / / http://niclas.hedhman.org /

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 14:32 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: Once again, there was no technical breach of

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Authority without accountability? I'm could imagine why you and other members of the board feel comfortable with this. Make a chair accountable to the committee and the next thing you know will be board accountability to chairs. Oh god -

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 20:13 To: community@apache.org Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed On Dec 21, 2004, at 2:02 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Authority without accountability?

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: No policy adopted by a project can supercede the policies of the ASF. Any that do are null and void, or, at best, advisory only. Then clearly you have been negligent in your responsibility towards the Avalon community. No more

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: From: Geir Magnusson Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] I realize that this is little more than a filibuster, and I probably should be smacked for feeding *this* troll *smack* Stephen. Excellent, Geir! Reponding to Stephen, you

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 20:22 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: No policy adopted by a project can supercede the

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 20:22 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: No policy adopted by a project can supercede the

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html The Jini technology is going Open Source and I think that is great, and even though I tried hard, it will not be under a ASL2.0 license, most likely the MIT license. Furthermore,

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Scott Sanders
Clearly you are not prepared to face up to the fact that the there is a disconnect within the ASF policies and procedures and the functioning of an open community. Clearly you are not prepared, willing or able to address this. You decision to abstain from further discussion within this context

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Serge Knystautas
Stephen McConnell wrote: Clearly you are not prepared to face up to the fact that the there is a disconnect within the ASF policies and procedures and the functioning of an open community. Clearly you are not prepared, willing or able to address this. You decision to abstain from further

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Henri Yandell
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: http://www.apache.org/licenses/GPL-compatibility.html The Jini technology is going Open Source and I think that is great, and even though I tried hard, it will not be under a ASL2.0 license,

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread robert burrell donkin
On 21 Dec 2004, at 19:52, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: snip Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers in the ASL2.0 can be circumvented in nasty ways by a truly malicious company/individual if that is the intent, SO

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 03:54, Scott Sanders wrote: If there is anything wrong with the policies and procedures of the ASF, it is that Avalon was not shut down in 2001 or before. I have spent most of the evening reading mails pre-Avalon TLP and especially the period around the TLP was

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Noel J. Bergman
Stephen McConnell wrote: Clearly you are not prepared to face up to the fact that the there is a disconnect within the ASF policies and procedures and the functioning of an open community. Rather, you are not willing to see that despite the ASF's utopian ideals, we recognize in our legal

Re: Is ASL2.0 not 'GPL-compatible' ??

2004-12-21 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 14:15, robert burrell donkin dijo: On 21 Dec 2004, at 19:52, Niclas Hedhman wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: snip Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers in the ASL2.0 can be circumvented in

Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Rodent of Unusual Size
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: Clearly you are not prepared to face up to the fact that the there is a disconnect within the ASF policies and procedures and the functioning of an open community. Clearly you are not prepared, willing or able to address this.

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote: Furthermore, it was explained to me that the patent right disclaimers in the ASL2.0 can be circumvented in nasty ways by a truly malicious company/individual if that is the

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Erik Abele
On 21.12.2004, at 21:15, robert burrell donkin wrote: by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to be enforceable by criminal sanction. any company wanted to maliciously damage an open source project would only have to target individual european release managers using

RE: [ANN] Avalon Closed

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Rodent of Unusual Size [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 21:55 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: [ANN] Avalon Closed -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Stephen McConnell wrote: Clearly you are not prepared to face up to the fact

RE: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 21 December 2004 21:59 To: community@apache.org Subject: Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ?? On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: On Tuesday 21 December 2004 00:02, Nicola Ken

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Scott Sanders
On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: There is a lot of due process to ensure that any release which goes out is an ASF release and that any deceisions are taken by the committers with a proper vote and with proper oversight by the board of directors. As long as committers stick to

RE: Is ASL2.0 not 'GPL-compatible' ??

2004-12-21 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo: Will the ASF shield me? I doubt it. I really doubt it. Stephen. Why not Stephen? In all stuff related to the ASF I guess the answer is a clear yes as whatever other ASF committer or member. Why you doubt it? AFAIK there is no a

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 04:59, Dirk-Willem van Gulik wrote: On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, robert burrell donkin wrote: pliant european legal system (UK law, for example). i don't see any way in which the ASF could act to help release managers faced with the criminal law in europe Also note

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 05:23, Scott Sanders wrote: On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Will the ASF shield me? I doubt it. I really doubt it. Why do you say things like this? Do you fail to understand this is the primary reason for the establishment of the ASF.

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Rainer Klute
Am Dienstag, den 21.12.2004, 20:15 + schrieb robert burrell donkin: in europe at least, it's very likely that this won't really matter. by this time next year, software patent violations are most likely to be enforceable by criminal sanction. ... I don't think so. The winds are changing

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Geir Magnusson Jr .
On Dec 21, 2004, at 4:23 PM, Scott Sanders wrote: On Dec 21, 2004, at 1:17 PM, Stephen McConnell wrote: Will the ASF shield me? I doubt it. I really doubt it. Stephen. Why do you say things like this? Do you fail to understand this is the primary reason for the establishment of the ASF. s/Do//

Re: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-21 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Wed, 2004-12-22 at 03:52 +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: Now, hasn't their been licensing disputes from (L)GPL camps, IIRC JBoss?? Where they were accusing the ASF of breach of licensing. Can't ASF pay back with the same coins, referring to their own authority (FSF) about that the

RE: Is ASL2.0 not 'GPL-compatible' ??

2004-12-21 Thread Henning Schmiedehausen
On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:28 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo: AFAIK there is no a clausule telling: All committers or members, except Stephen ;-) You don't seem to have access to the purple files... Regards

RE: Is ASL2.0 not 'GPL-compatible' ??

2004-12-21 Thread Antonio Gallardo
On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 17:12, Henning Schmiedehausen dijo: On Tue, 2004-12-21 at 15:28 -0600, Antonio Gallardo wrote: On Mar, 21 de Diciembre de 2004, 15:17, Stephen McConnell dijo: AFAIK there is no a clausule telling: All committers or members, except Stephen ;-) You don't seem