RE: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-22 Thread Dirk-Willem van Gulik
On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Stephen McConnell wrote: Will the ASF shield me? In normal cases - yes as it is in the interest of the ASF community and codebase long term. And we are in it for the long term. However if you go outside the CLA and the normal oversight process and that is what causes the

RE: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ??

2004-12-22 Thread Stephen McConnell
-Original Message- From: Dirk-Willem van Gulik [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: 22 December 2004 01:21 To: community@apache.org Subject: RE: Is ASL2.0 not GPL-compatible ?? On Tue, 21 Dec 2004, Stephen McConnell wrote: Will the ASF shield me? In normal cases - yes as it

Re: Requesting clarification in ByLaw text.

2004-12-22 Thread Greg Stein
On Tue, Dec 21, 2004 at 08:48:59PM +0800, Niclas Hedhman wrote: ... Now, section 6.3 in the ByLaws of the ASF doesn't rhyme entirely correctly with the quotes from the IRC session. You said; The PMC is an artificial construct. Section 6.3 forgets to mention that. In essence, the PMC is

Re: Requesting clarification in ByLaw text.

2004-12-22 Thread Niclas Hedhman
On Wednesday 22 December 2004 15:27, Greg Stein wrote: FWIW, I liked your phrase in another email about renaming the PMC Bylaws to something like Standard Operating Rules or somesuch. Tho my personal opinion is to just lose them and have one set of rules for all ASF PMCs. That would make *me*