Re: [QtMoko] amd64 compilation trouble

2011-05-20 Thread giacomo 'giotti' mariani
On 05/16/2011 15:43, giacomo 'giotti' mariani wrote: Hi Ed Hi Giacomo, There might be something wrong with the libraries, can you check with: ldd /opt/toolchains/arm920t-eabi/bin/arm-linux-gnueabi-gcc-4.3 Kind regards, Ed here the output of ldd follows: jack@nb2-mariani:~$ ldd

Re: Aurora

2011-05-20 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Freitag, den 20.05.2011, 19:57 +0200 schrieb Enrico Zini: On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 06:02:58PM +0200, Michael 'Mickey' Lauer wrote: SUPPORTED DEVICES We decided to only support the Palm Pre devices (Pre/Pre Plus/Pre 2) for the first to-be-released version of Aurora. More supported

Re: Aurora

2011-05-20 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Although we have seen a welcome level of standardization via kernel class devices in the past years, there are still too many home-grown vendor solutions and interfaces developed out of the kernel tree. All those we (FSO) have to adapt to provide a unified experience to the application level.

Re: [QtMoko] faenqomod updated

2011-05-20 Thread Joif
Hi! This [ยน] is a little update of FaenqoMod, changelog: - added two icons for the addressbook; - new layout for the home screen with a BIG clock (: - new layout for the titlebar with the great return of the clock close to the battery icon; Screenshots at http://db.tt/vG5D0yZ I am grateful if

Re: Aurora

2011-05-20 Thread Neil Jerram
Hi Simon, Many thanks for your explanations of Aurora. I think I understand now, at least as regards what you are trying to do, and why. I have just one further comment below. On 17 May 2011 06:57, Simon Busch morp...@gravedo.de wrote: Aurora is not about fragmentation. Zhone was already