Hello.
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 13:07, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On Sun, 2009-03-01 at 17:10, Onen wrote:
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
For what I have understood, you would prefer a SCM. And now that first
release is out, the first point on my TODO list was exactly that. You
will find a git
Hi,
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
I'll will look into preparing a recipe for it today or tomorrow and will let
you
know if I run into problems that are better solved on your side.
Just finished a recipe for it. It was rather ugly to make sure every file
installs at the right place.
Ugly? Do you
Hello.
On Tue, 2009-03-03 at 23:33, Onen wrote:
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
I'll will look into preparing a recipe for it today or tomorrow and will
let you
know if I run into problems that are better solved on your side.
Just finished a recipe for it. It was rather ugly to make sure
Hi,
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
It is Python based, so the files in the package are the source file.
Yep, I'm aware of that.
You will find in the package everything needed:
source code, desktop file, images, glade file, authors, licenses, etc...
Yep, this is also known. It's not the first
onen...@free.fr wrote:
For the moment our position is:
We log the cell ids we get connected to.
We do not log the neighbour cells. The reason is: if we are far from the
cells,
we will (maybe, this needs experimentation to my point of view) see the cells
even very far. I fear that it
Hello.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 20:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
First problem. Where can I find the source code? Something like a tarball with
the version number in the name or a source code management system would be
best.
It seems I'm only able to download the ipk but not the files it was build
Hello.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 20:00, Stefan Schmidt wrote:
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 19:23, Onen wrote:
I don't have a recipe. Nothing comes to my mind about something special
for building it. It was working with python 2.5 under FSO M4.1. The
package puts the file now under 2.6 python
Olivier Migeot wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:
There are many creative commons licenses, some are permit commercial
use, some don't.
If you go one click further, you'd discover that the said Creative
Commons licence chosed by
yeah http://www.sites.bipt.be/indexnl1.html has the same for belgium
I e-mailed them already twice about the licences, they did not respond :(
y
On Sat, Feb 21, 2009 at 10:45 PM, Tim Dobson li...@tdobson.net wrote:
Olivier Migeot wrote:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
Hi,
Why setting up your own database, while opencellid has
TotalCells:106120 acording to http://www.opencellid.org/cell/stats ?
I think using there database will concentrate the data in on place and
will give you a better coverage.
Kind regards,
@
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:54 +0100, Onen wrote:
Hi,
this has already been discussed in this thread on the devel list:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/devel/2009-January/004064.html
What happens is that the license of data in the opencellid database is not
clearly stated. People from openmoko has tried to contact them. We have tried
two
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 11:36 AM, onen...@free.fr wrote:
What happens is that the license of data in the opencellid database is not
clearly stated. People from openmoko has tried to contact them. We have tried
two times over three months time to contact them also. We have no answer so
far.
Well, on the frontpage, bottom line it says:
The data are available under the Creative Common license.
Is that enough, or do you need more info about the details of that
license?
Kind regards,
Ed
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 11:36 +0100, onen...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
this has already been discussed
Ed Kapitein e...@kapitein.org writes:
Well, on the frontpage, bottom line it says:
The data are available under the Creative Common license.
Is that enough, or do you need more info about the details of that
license?
There are many creative commons licenses, some are permit commercial
use,
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Timo Juhani Lindfors
timo.lindf...@iki.fi wrote:
There are many creative commons licenses, some are permit commercial
use, some don't.
If you go one click further, you'd discover that the said Creative
Commons licence chosed by OpenCellID is :
Hi, you said
So it should be ok for openbmap guys. That could explain the thing
about merging both databases. Any official insight on this? I've
been collecting cell information for a few weeks, with some home-made
script, and I'd like to know where I should commit them to.
Could you please
Maybe this can help a bit:
http://www.sites.bipt.be/indexfr1.html
(click on the first blue link)
it wil display a map of belgium, with all cell towers (already built
and those with a building permission)
if you click on a dot, you can get a pdf with information about who
owns the tower, where it
And are you guys aware of cellhunter?
http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/CellHunter
http://78.47.116.33/~hole/cellhunter/
you could work together, and maybe also incorporate the game concept
for those interested
y
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:16 PM, Yorick Moko yorickm...@gmail.com wrote:
Maybe this
Hi,
here is the post of the thread I pointed out earlier explaining why this is not
clear at all, and why we have tried to reach the people behind opencellid.org
(without any success).
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/devel/2009-January/004161.html
quote
The logo is placed next to the
excuse me for the spam, but just thought of something else:
do you guys also log information about neighbouring cells, like cellhunter does?
this might also be interesting when you have gps coordinates
the accuracy of the neighbouring cells are much lower ofcourse, but
could also provide some very
Hi,
I had a look, but did not find a way to download the data? And what is the
license?
The whole point to me, is to have data with a license which lets me download it,
and use it directly on my phone. I don't want to send my GSM coordinate to any
third party on the Web to get my GPS position.
I have discovered this project as I was cleaning up my code for release. At
first glance, the differences are:
* It sends direct AT commands to the modem, and parse the responses.
openBmap relies on freesmartphone.org
* So far they only collect data.
We already have the Web API available to
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 1:49 PM, kimaidou kimai...@gmail.com wrote:
Could you please make a wiki page and put + explain your script for doing
that ? I think we can go very fast if anyone can use them (thinking about
how openstreetmap extends..)
Thanks in advance
Sure I can, I'll try to send
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:31 PM, onen...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
I had a look, but did not find a way to download the data? And what is the
license?
You mean data from opencellid? I guess the raw data link in their
menu doesn't fit?
Or try there http://myapp.fr/cellsIdData/
--
Olivier
For the moment our position is:
We log the cell ids we get connected to.
We do not log the neighbour cells. The reason is: if we are far from the cells,
we will (maybe, this needs experimentation to my point of view) see the cells
even very far. I fear that it would stretch the areas, and thus
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:42 PM, onen...@free.fr wrote:
Any comments?
That's the current position of my script too. But I wanted to log both
the current cell and the respective levels of the neighbour cells.
That way, I could try (with a lt of data) to guess the actual
localization of the
No. If you look correctly at my response, I was responding to the message from
Yorick, about http://www.sites.bipt.be/indexfr1.html
Onen
Quoting Olivier Migeot larry...@gmail.com:
On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 2:31 PM, onen...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
I had a look, but did not find a way to
isn't more data always preferable? you could still decide not to use them...
cells that we are connected to would recieve a higher precision off course,
but if I walk five times around in a city, and I never get connected
to a certain cell, but I know a lot of points where that cell is in
range,
If you are interested in getting the position of the cells, this point was
discussed in the thread I pointed out earlier in this thread:
http://lists.openmoko.org/pipermail/devel/2009-January/004064.html
Maybe this can help you with your work.
Onen
Quoting Olivier Migeot larry...@gmail.com:
Hello.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:54, Onen wrote:
the openBmap team is happy to announce the first release of the openBmap
[1] logger/uploader for freesmartphone.org.
Awesome. Thanks for doing this.
The package Freesmartphone.org client [2] provides you with a logger,
and an uploader. It
hi,
Yorick Moko wrote:
isn't more data always preferable? you could still decide not to use them...
cells that we are connected to would recieve a higher precision off course,
Agreed. That is the point of view of Nick (from the project). Add a
field to know if the log is a connected cell,
Hello,
Stefan Schmidt wrote:
Hello.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 09:54, Onen wrote:
the openBmap team is happy to announce the first release of the openBmap
[1] logger/uploader for freesmartphone.org.
Awesome. Thanks for doing this.
I think so too ;-)
The package Freesmartphone.org client
Hello.
On Fri, 2009-02-20 at 19:23, Onen wrote:
I don't have a recipe. Nothing comes to my mind about something special
for building it. It was working with python 2.5 under FSO M4.1. The
package puts the file now under 2.6 python directories, under FSO M5.
I only have forgotten one
33 matches
Mail list logo