Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-29 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors 
Alishams Hassam  writes:
> and disable the wifi. If the battery is still shit, leave wifi off after
> a restart and see if battery life improves. 

How about giving exact numbers by measuring the consumption using

om battery consumption

or via /sys directly? (I think you need current_now file).


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Alishams Hassam 
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 23:11 +0200, Gand' wrote:
> really ?
> because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't
> exceed a day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with
> SHR ...
> if it's not the #1024, what else ?
> -- 
>   Gand'
Have you been using wifi? I know for sure on older versions of qtmoko if
I enable wifi after suspend-resume it is disconnected but still shows as
online in the GUI. I noticed my battery life would heavily suffer. Two
thing you could try assuming this is still a problem. After using wifi
and doing a suspend-resume, make sure you go into the "internet" menu
and disable the wifi. If the battery is still shit, leave wifi off after
a restart and see if battery life improves. 


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand' 
really ?
because "always" doesn't seem to work, as my battery life doesn't exceed a
day with QTmoko, whereas it lasts more or less 3 days with SHR ...
if it's not the #1024, what else ?
-- 
  Gand'

On Wed, Apr 28, 2010 at 11:46 AM, Radek Polak  wrote:

> On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' wrote:
>
> > The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko
> > /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf*
> > is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR)
>
>
> It's the same if you have "always" or "yes". The code checks for "never"
> and
> activates deep sleep otherwise.
>
>
> http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/blob/master/devices/neo/src/plugins/phonevendors/neo/vendor_neo.cpp
>
>if (deepsleep == "never")
>chat("AT%SLEEP=2");
>else
>chat("AT%SLEEP=4");
>
> Regards
>
> Radek
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Radek Polak 
On Wednesday 28 April 2010 10:31:30 Gand' wrote:

> The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko
> /etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf*
> is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR)


It's the same if you have "always" or "yes". The code checks for "never" and 
activates deep sleep otherwise.

http://github.com/radekp/qtmoko/blob/master/devices/neo/src/plugins/phonevendors/neo/vendor_neo.cpp

if (deepsleep == "never")
chat("AT%SLEEP=2");
else
chat("AT%SLEEP=4");

Regards

Radek

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Petr Vanek 
On Wed, 28 Apr 2010 10:31:30 +0200
"Gand'"  (G) wrote:

>The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko
>/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf*
>is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR)


i have already corrected the 1024 page [1] on openmoko wiki if the
confusion comes from there. this was the info i got from the ML.

cheers

Petr

[1] http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/1024


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-28 Thread Gand' 
The correct value to fix #1024 in qtmoko in */opt/qtmoko
/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf*
is "*yes*" instead of "always" ("always" is the value to use with SHR)
-- 
  Gand'

On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 1:31 PM, Alfa21  wrote:

>
> another cause maybe:
>
> [quoting from wiki about debian]
> echo 500 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_max_clk
> echo 3 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_drive
>
> If that resolves the problem and installation completes, you are that much
> wiser. However, SD card performance is reduced even from the default, power
> consumption increases and SD card power could interfere with GPS
> functionality.
> [/quote]
>
> ...and qtmoko uses sd_max_clk in /etc/init.d/qpe.sh for compatibility
> reasons
>
> --
> ALFA21 IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR
> IMPLIED.
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-17 Thread Alfa21 

another cause maybe:

[quoting from wiki about debian]
echo 500 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_max_clk
echo 3 > /sys/module/glamo_mci/parameters/sd_drive

If that resolves the problem and installation completes, you are that much 
wiser. However, SD card performance is reduced even from the default, power 
consumption increases and SD card power could interfere with GPS functionality.
[/quote]

...and qtmoko uses sd_max_clk in /etc/init.d/qpe.sh for compatibility reasons

-- 
ALFA21 IS PROVIDED "AS IS" AND WITHOUT WARRANTIES OF ANY KIND, EXPRESS OR 
IMPLIED.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-14 Thread Yann SLADEK 
Hi Niels,

Already did it (1024 bug fix and parameter modified)

Regards,

Yann
- Mail Original -
De: "Niels Heyvaert" 
À: community@lists.openmoko.org
Envoyé: Mercredi 14 Avril 2010 10:11:00 GMT +01:00 Amsterdam / Berlin / Berne / 
Rome / Stockholm / Vienne
Objet: RE: [QtMoko] Bug 1024


Aslo see: 

http://qtmoko.org/wiki/FAQ#How_about_power_save_of_Calypso.2C_the_GSM_modem_-_bug_.231024
 

Niels. 

> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:19:26 +0200 
> From: yann.sla...@free.fr 
> To: community@lists.openmoko.org 
> Subject: Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024 
> 
> As said before, by modifying parameter 'Active' from' never' to 'always' 
> and then reboot the phone 
> 
> Yann 
> > Yann SLADEK writes: 
> > 
> >> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying 
> >> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf 


U surft nog met Internet Explorer 6 of 7? Nu gratis upgraden ! 
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

RE: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-14 Thread Niels Heyvaert 

Aslo see:

 

http://qtmoko.org/wiki/FAQ#How_about_power_save_of_Calypso.2C_the_GSM_modem_-_bug_.231024


Niels.
 
> Date: Tue, 13 Apr 2010 23:19:26 +0200
> From: yann.sla...@free.fr
> To: community@lists.openmoko.org
> Subject: Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024
> 
> As said before, by modifying parameter 'Active' from' never' to 'always' 
> and then reboot the phone
> 
> Yann
> > Yann SLADEK writes:
> > 
> >> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
> >> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
  
_
Internet Explorer 8 : nu veiliger dan ooit dankzij nieuwe update
http://www.microsoft.com/belux/nl/windows/internet-explorer/___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Yann SLADEK 
As said before, by modifying parameter 'Active' from' never' to 'always' 
and then reboot the phone

Yann
> Yann SLADEK  writes:
>
>> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
>> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
>>  
> I do not use qtmoko but how did you modify Modem.conf?
>
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Yann SLADEK 

Hi,

I can't tell, count I use my FR for 30min a day for calls, maybe 
30min-1h a day for missed calls and voicemail checking + shr playing :))

Same for QtMoko

Yann
(just a question: 70h suspension included? if yes how many hours of 
suspension?)

d

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Yann SLADEK > wrote:


Hi list,

for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024
fixed by myself)

With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can
use my
FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for
fun,etc..)
With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
/opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf

Anyone has the same problem ? Something else has to be done ?

Thanks

Yann

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org 
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
   


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Margo 
On 13 April 2010 22:18, Yann SLADEK  wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024
> fixed by myself)
>
> With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my
> FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for
> fun,etc..)
> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
>
> Anyone has the same problem ? Something else has to be done ?
>

I have #1024 fixed and I changed "Active=never" to "Active=always" in
/opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
The battery life is about 3 days.

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors 
Yann SLADEK  writes:
> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying 
> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf

I do not use qtmoko but how did you modify Modem.conf?


___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Risto H. Kurppa 
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 10:18 PM, Yann SLADEK  wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024
> fixed by myself)
>
> With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my
> FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for
> fun,etc..)
> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
>
> Anyone has the same problem ? Something else has to be done ?

Same here, Debian gives me days, qtmoko ~1 day


r

-- 
| risto h. kurppa
| risto at kurppa dot fi
| http://risto.kurppa.fi

___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: [QtMoko] Bug 1024

2010-04-13 Thread Davide Scaini 
(just a question: 70h suspension included? if yes how many hours of
suspension?)
d

On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 9:18 PM, Yann SLADEK  wrote:

> Hi list,
>
> for the past few weeks, I tried both QtMoko and SHR with my FR (#1024
> fixed by myself)
>
> With SHR, modifying /etc/frameworkd.conf did the trick and I can use my
> FR for approx. 65-70h in a normal way (few calls, text, wifi just for
> fun,etc..)
> With QtMoko, I cannot go up to 20h, after modifying
> /opt/qtmoko/etc/default/Trolltech/Modem.conf
>
> Anyone has the same problem ? Something else has to be done ?
>
> Thanks
>
> Yann
>
> ___
> Openmoko community mailing list
> community@lists.openmoko.org
> http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
>
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community