On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:16:02AM +0200, Bernhard Reiter wrote:
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 21:00 +0200 schrieb Rask Ingemann
Lambertsen:
Someone needs to sit down with the firmware interface
specification (i.e. from the existing driver?) and match it up
with the Linux network device API
Am Sonntag, den 16.08.2009, 21:00 +0200 schrieb Rask Ingemann
Lambertsen:
What little I've seen of that code does not look promising. The author
didn't understand the netif_stop_queue()/netif_wake_queue() calls, so who
knows what else might have gone wrong? Someone needs to sit down with the
On Sat, Aug 15, 2009 at 01:14:37AM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
I really hoped Werner would take care of that but he's too busy with
gta02-core project currently and we lack another expert in Wifi in
general and Atheros's crappy code in particular :(
What little I've seen of that code does
arne anka openm...@ginguppin.de writes:
and the fr is shock frozen.
not really convincing a performance.
Reproduced it. Thanks for the bugreport, will try to
investigate.
Sorry for misinformation, i guess i did something slightly different
before so it didn't result in kernel panic. Sorry :(
Sorry for misinformation,
i don't think misinformation is the right word here -- at least it
helped me to understnad, what is supposed to be done and to happen.
and it looks like that instigated other people as well to try again.
if you or someone else can make something from the output, i'd
The way I got around this is to use two scripts - the first just handles
spawning wpa_suppliocant and stops at a read statement - then hitting a
return key exits the script. The various rm and kill commands are to
cleanup before and after - needed for reliable and repeatable
connections! This
well, i did right now
# fsoraw -r WiFi -- wpa_supplicant -ieth0 -Dwext
-c/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
which resulted in
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported
arne anka wrote:
well, i did
right now
# fsoraw -r WiFi -- wpa_supplicant -ieth0 -Dwext
-c/etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf
which resulted in
[snip a lot]
indefinitely.
I get excatly the same.
Only once have I managed to get a DHCP lease, but the network failed
just after
Peter Mogensen a...@bigendian.dk writes:
Some one must know what has changed? New kernel?
Well, i must admit i collected several reports that despite huge gains
from moving to upstream SDIO stack there're some regressions. Several
people reported they can't connect to the networks they were able
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 11:19:55 am you wrote:
Adam, i can't see a decent reason for you to omit the list from CC.
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:09:35AM -0400, Adam Jimerson wrote:
On Wednesday 12 August 2009 04:57:48 am you wrote:
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
On Tuesday 11
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
wpa_supplicant never gets DHCP, that's something a dhcp client should be
used for. Also you don't say if you tried the maxperf trick or not.
I know that wpa_supplicant doesn't handle DHCP but when I was using it then
the ifup command would say that it
I know that wpa_supplicant doesn't handle DHCP but when I was using it
then
the ifup command would say that it connected, didn't return an error,
but DHCP
would always fail but it never did this before.
ifup command is unnecessary here and quite possibly messes something
up.
ok, i
On Thursday 13 August 2009 10:55:38 am arne anka wrote:
I know that wpa_supplicant doesn't handle DHCP but when I was using it
then
the ifup command would say that it connected, didn't return an error,
but DHCP
would always fail but it never did this before.
ifup command is
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
On Thursday 13 August 2009 10:55:38 am arne anka wrote:
I know that wpa_supplicant doesn't handle DHCP but when I was using it
then
the ifup command would say that it connected, didn't return an error,
but DHCP
would always fail but it never did
Paul Fertser wrote:
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
Same here I would like to know how to connect to a network without using the
ifconfig commands
0. So, clean boot, you didn't touch resource policies in any way (SHR
settings/mdbus/whatever).
1. Then ``vim
Peter Mogensen a...@bigendian.dk writes:
Paul Fertser wrote:
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
Same here I would like to know how to connect to a network without using
the
ifconfig commands
0. So, clean boot, you didn't touch resource policies in any way (SHR
Bernhard Reiter ock...@raz.or.at writes:
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 10:41 +0400 schrieb Paul Fertser:
Please try wpa_supplicant method as described on FSO_Resources
wikipage and report the results.
ok, using fsoraw it seems to connect to the router (only the important
part given here):
Adam Jimerson vend...@gmail.com writes:
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 02:41:53 am Paul Fertser wrote:
Please try wpa_supplicant method as described on FSO_Resources
wikipage and report the results.
I know wpa_supplicant stopped working for me, I don't know what went wrong
but when I started
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:56:26PM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
Bernhard Reiter ock...@raz.or.at writes:
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 10:41 +0400 schrieb Paul Fertser:
Please try wpa_supplicant method as described on FSO_Resources
wikipage and report the results.
ok, using fsoraw it seems
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 11:39:18AM +0100, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:56:26PM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
Bernhard Reiter ock...@raz.or.at writes:
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 10:41 +0400 schrieb Paul Fertser:
Please try wpa_supplicant method as described on
i don't think i've ever got wifi to work
I feel your pain :(
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
Adolph J. Vogel ajvo...@tuks.co.za writes:
i don't think i've ever got wifi to work
I feel your pain :(
Try to do what's written on FSO_Resources wiki page and report the
results. The wlan chip _is_ compatible with most APs and the proposed
method of using it _does_ in fact work.
--
Be free,
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 2:43 PM, Bernhard Reiterock...@raz.or.at wrote:
hi,
using shr-u and mokonnect, i get a timeout when trying to connect to my
managed wpa-secured home wlan router (while it is trying to setup
dhcp, though things work fine with my laptop). is this some well-known
issue
Adolph J. Vogel ajvo...@tuks.co.za writes:
Im sorry if this is an obvious question, but what kernel is wifi bug
free?
There's no such kernel in existance.
And wifi firmware is not bugfree and most probably will never
be. Blame Canada^W Atheros. Or buy a decent usb wifi dongle. :(
--
Be free,
On Wednesday 12 August 2009, Paul Fertser wrote:
Adolph J. Vogel ajvo...@tuks.co.za writes:
Im sorry if this is an obvious question, but what kernel is wifi bug
free?
There's no such kernel in existance.
And wifi firmware is not bugfree and most probably will never
be. Blame Canada^W
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:04:26PM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org writes:
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 12:56:26PM +0400, Paul Fertser wrote:
Bernhard Reiter ock...@raz.or.at writes:
CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
Trying to associate with mac address (SSID='SSID'
On Wed, Aug 12, 2009 at 03:09:44PM +0200, Adolph J. Vogel wrote:
Rui, what kernel are you using?
r...@om-gta02 ~ $ uname -a
Linux om-gta02 2.6.29-rc3 #1 PREEMPT Sun Aug 2 12:17:54 CEST 2009 armv4tl
unknown
(which I think is the most recent uImage available on 2009/08/08).
With the shr-image
2009/8/11 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
To me it has never worked, but never means in images 20090721 and 20090808 of
shr-u
It doesn't even bother to set the SSID, but I don't know who's really at
fault here,
mokonnect or connman.
Anyway, connman is a real piece of crap (but
Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com writes:
2009/8/11 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
Anyway, connman is a real piece of crap (but NetworkManager is just
marginally
lesser crap) sprout from people with NIH sindrome who don't understand NM.
does wifi work yet with newer kernels? i
On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 06:37:03PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
2009/8/11 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
To me it has never worked, but never means in images 20090721 and 20090808
of shr-u
It doesn't even bother to set the SSID, but I don't know who's really at
fault here,
On Tuesday 11 August 2009 02:41:53 am Paul Fertser wrote:
Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com writes:
2009/8/11 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra r...@1407.org:
Anyway, connman is a real piece of crap (but NetworkManager is just
marginally lesser crap) sprout from people with NIH sindrome who don't
Am Dienstag, den 11.08.2009, 10:41 +0400 schrieb Paul Fertser:
Please try wpa_supplicant method as described on FSO_Resources
wikipage and report the results.
ok, using fsoraw it seems to connect to the router (only the important
part given here):
CTRL-EVENT-SCAN-RESULTS
Trying to associate
On Monday 10 August 2009 08:43:40 am Bernhard Reiter wrote:
hi,
using shr-u and mokonnect, i get a timeout when trying to connect to my
managed wpa-secured home wlan router (while it is trying to setup
dhcp, though things work fine with my laptop). is this some well-known
issue or do i have
On Mon, Aug 10, 2009 at 11:11:54AM -0400, Adam Jimerson wrote:
On Monday 10 August 2009 08:43:40 am Bernhard Reiter wrote:
hi,
using shr-u and mokonnect, i get a timeout when trying to connect to my
managed wpa-secured home wlan router (while it is trying to setup
dhcp, though things
34 matches
Mail list logo
