stuff on it). Lots of ideas, too little time
Steve
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:17 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Battery life case design
Mikko
On Wed, 2008-07-02 at 00:04 +0200, Diego Fdez. Durán wrote:
El mar, 01-07-2008 a las 13:22 -0700, steve escribió:
A deeper back cover is an option. The cad files are open. I also thought of
an external battery pack
What about this: http://www.thinkgeek.com/gadgets/travelpower/7d34/ ?
Am Di 1. Juli 2008 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I wonder, is it just me or are there enough people out there who are
interested in having more power? Enough people to make it worth while some
company (maybe openmoko) to tool up to produce a new back cover for the
gta02
thats a few mm
Am Mi 2. Juli 2008 schrieb Francesco Cat:
FR only accepts 100 or 500 mA current I think.
Nope, FR sets MAXIMUM USB current to either 0.1, 0.5, or 1A depending on
what's detected to be connected. This doesn't mean it won't work with 600mA.
Either you set FR to 500mA and lose ~100mA of power
[EMAIL PROTECTED] schrieb:
Hi,
I'm totally thrilled with all the goodies crammed into the gta02, and I'm even
more thrilled with the ideas people are having to use these goodies.
Whats less thrilling is the battery life. Switch on all those goodies and you
have a phone that will be dead in
I wonder, is it just me or are there enough people out there who are
interested in having more power? Enough people to make it worth while
some
company (maybe openmoko) to tool up to produce a new back cover for the
gta02
well, there are probably a few ideas now floating around
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 14:35 +0200, Arne Zachlod kirjoitti:
Im not sure, but I think with an even thicker phone there will be more
no-geeks who dont care about the freeness who wont buy the phone only
because its thick and heavy (and such a phone would be heavy).
Actually reading the text you
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 14:35 +0200, Arne Zachlod kirjoitti:
Im not sure, but I think with an even thicker phone there will be more
no-geeks who dont care about the freeness who wont buy the phone only
because its thick and heavy (and such a phone would be heavy).
a phone straight away (which is fine with some tweaks). However,
care to elaborate?
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community
: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:17 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Battery life case design
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 14:35 +0200, Arne Zachlod kirjoitti:
Im not sure, but I think with an even thicker phone there will be
more no-geeks who dont care about the freeness who
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Battery life case design
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 14:35 +0200, Arne Zachlod kirjoitti:
Im not sure, but I think with an even thicker phone there will be
more no-geeks who dont care about the freeness who wont buy the phone
only
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 7:17 AM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: Re: Battery life case design
Mikko Rauhala wrote:
ti, 2008-07-01 kello 14:35 +0200, Arne Zachlod kirjoitti:
Im not sure, but I think
, conceptually those are the options.
-Original Message-
From: Diego Fdez. Durán [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 01, 2008 3:04 PM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Battery life case design
El mar, 01-07-2008 a las 13:22
13 matches
Mail list logo
