Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-09 Thread Gilles Filippini
Neil Jerram a écrit , Le 09/02/2010 01:07: > Just to check that I'm understanding correctly... Are you saying > that, for you, > >>> * control.63: 'Mic 2' >>> * control.12: 0 > > gives equally good audio quality as > >>> * control.63: 'Right PGA' >>> * control.12: 6 > > ? Indeed. But I've onl

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-08 Thread Al Johnson
On Tuesday 09 February 2010, Neil Jerram wrote: > On 7 February 2010 22:01, Gilles Filippini wrote: > > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 15:31: > >> Al Johnson a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 10:59: > >>> Routing through the PGA just attenuates the signal slightly before > >>> it gets to the mono

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-08 Thread Neil Jerram
On 7 February 2010 22:01, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 15:31: >> Al Johnson a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 10:59: >>> Routing through the PGA just attenuates the signal slightly before >>> it gets to the mono mixer. Turning the mono mixer setting down from 7 to 6 >>

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-07 Thread Gilles Filippini
Gilles Filippini a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 15:31: > Al Johnson a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 10:59: >> Routing through the PGA just attenuates the signal slightly before >> it gets to the mono mixer. Turning the mono mixer setting down from 7 to 6 >> or >> 5 will be just as effective. > > FWIW, my curr

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-07 Thread Gilles Filippini
Hi, Al Johnson a écrit , Le 07/02/2010 10:59: > Routing through the PGA just attenuates the signal slightly before > it gets to the mono mixer. Turning the mono mixer setting down from 7 to 6 or > 5 will be just as effective. FWIW, my current working settings are: * control.48: 1 * control.63

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-07 Thread Al Johnson
On Saturday 06 February 2010, Gilles Filippini wrote: > Neil Jerram a écrit , Le 06/02/2010 15:51: > > On 2 December 2009 13:47, wrote: > >>3. change control 63 (it's also on line 63), so that it ends in 3 > >> rather than in 2: * Old value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:2 > >> * New va

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-06 Thread Xavier Cremaschi
On 06/02/2010 17:00, Neil Jerram wrote: > On 6 February 2010 15:54, Xavier Cremaschi wrote: > >> But if you use the speaker (intone, podboy, mplayer...), don't you have >> sound only in one side (right in your case) ? > > I don't use speaker for calls. The change that I mentioned is only > for gs

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-06 Thread Gilles Filippini
Neil Jerram a écrit , Le 06/02/2010 15:51: > On 2 December 2009 13:47, wrote: >>3. change control 63 (it's also on line 63), so that it ends in 3 >> rather than in 2: >> * Old value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:2 >> * New value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:3 ... > So: yes, I can

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-06 Thread Neil Jerram
On 6 February 2010 15:54, Xavier Cremaschi wrote: > But if you use the speaker (intone, podboy, mplayer...), don't you have > sound only in one side (right in your case) ? I don't use speaker for calls. The change that I mentioned is only for gsmhandset.state, which is only used for phone calls

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-06 Thread Xavier Cremaschi
On 06/02/2010 15:51, Neil Jerram wrote: > On 2 December 2009 13:47, wrote: >> >> 3. change control 63 (it's also on line 63), so that it ends in 3 >> rather than in 2: >> * Old value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:2 >> * New value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:3 > > I just rediscov

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2010-02-06 Thread Neil Jerram
On 2 December 2009 13:47, wrote: > >        3. change control 63 (it's also on line 63), so that it ends in 3 > rather than in 2: >         * Old value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:2 >         * New value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:3 I just rediscovered this improvement, by playing with alsamixer; th

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread Michael 'Mickey' Lauer
Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2009, 17:25 +0100 schrieb Matthias Felsche: > Besides: > I've implemented Dictator 0.3 as Dbus-Service and -Client. Will be > released soon. Don't know lot about fso-progress of the last months. Do > you already have something for recording sound I should rather use than >

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread David Garabana Barro
O Mércores, 2 de Decembro de 2009, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak escribiu: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:17, David Garabana Barro wrote: > > You can try the state.file from "old" SHR... > > Here "old" one was unusable at all here, "new" one is quite good. And > "new" one was official Openmoko's one, and

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 23:21, Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:17, David Garabana Barro >> wrote: >> > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:12:36 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> >> On Wed, Dec 02,

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread Matthias Felsche
Am Donnerstag, den 03.12.2009, 12:51 +0100 schrieb Dr. Michael Lauer: > It'd be helpful for the rest of the stack, if dictator would just use FSO's > Push/Pull scenario methods instead. > Ah ok! Did not know about them. This looks more convenient and tidy. Will be done like that. Besides: I'v

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread Dr. Michael Lauer
It'd be helpful for the rest of the stack, if dictator would just use FSO's Push/Pull scenario methods instead. :M: ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-03 Thread Matthias Felsche
Am Mittwoch, den 02.12.2009, 22:04 +0100 schrieb Davide Scaini: > uhm it seems that dictator uses this scenario > /usr/share/scenarios/dictator/dictator_rec.state > so...buh... is there a way to let dictator use "standard" scenarios? Recording is done via this state cause with it Dictator can re

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 08:31:22PM +0100, Sebastian Krzyszkowiak wrote: > On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:17, David Garabana Barro wrote: > > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:12:36 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:56:28PM +0100, arne anka wrote: > >> > did you ever change t

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Davide Scaini
uhm it seems that dictator uses this scenario /usr/share/scenarios/dictator/dictator_rec.state so...buh... is there a way to let dictator use "standard" scenarios? (just to test this damn alsastate). But the question still remains: if i find a nice regulation with alsamixer, how do i revert this in

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Davide Scaini
I have crackilg sound... so I want to figure out what to do... I installed dictator (just not to spend tons of €) and then I play with alsamixer opened. Now the questions: 1) How do I set a numeric value in the gsmhandset? 2) I set New value: 63:'Mic Sidetone Mux':1:3 but it seems it's not persist

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Sebastian Krzyszkowiak
On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 15:17, David Garabana Barro wrote: > On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:12:36 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: >> On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:56:28PM +0100, arne anka wrote: >> > did you ever change the gsmhandset.state file after applied buzz fix? >> > the tracker links to an im

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Al Johnson
On Wednesday 02 December 2009, r...@1407.org wrote: > Experiment: better sound on remote end > http://blog.1407.org/2009/12/02/experiment-better-sound-on-remote-end/ > > One of the problems people complain about my calls from the Freerunner is > *bad*sound*. Lot's of background noise, static, etc

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Davide Scaini
I had my fr just fixed, and i cannot place a call! ...better: i can call, but they just hear a crackling sound (not my voice). Tonight i'll try to apply your fix, i'm on the very very nice last shr-u (from 301109). Thanks d On Wed, Dec 2, 2009 at 3:17 PM, David Garabana Barro wrote: > On Wednesda

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread David Garabana Barro
On Wednesday 02 December 2009 15:12:36 Rui Miguel Silva Seabra wrote: > On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:56:28PM +0100, arne anka wrote: > > did you ever change the gsmhandset.state file after applied buzz fix? > > the tracker links to an improved file specifically tuned for buzz fixed > > devices and so

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread Rui Miguel Silva Seabra
On Wed, Dec 02, 2009 at 02:56:28PM +0100, arne anka wrote: > did you ever change the gsmhandset.state file after applied buzz fix? > the tracker links to an improved file specifically tuned for buzz fixed > devices and so far used by a lot of peoples. I'm using current SHR with the state file th

Re: Experiment: better sound on remote end

2009-12-02 Thread arne anka
did you ever change the gsmhandset.state file after applied buzz fix? the tracker links to an improved file specifically tuned for buzz fixed devices and so far used by a lot of peoples. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org