Bah! I meant to copy the list on that question.
Thanks for the answer though. Maybe someone else can also help
clarify? I thought fpga were basically PLDs and that they worked
exactly the same. I didn't know they lose config without power and need
to be reprogrammed.
--Tim
On Fri, 8 Dec
On 12/6/06, Ole Tange [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But even if this is not possible getting a FPGA out to the masses, I
would think would make a lot of difference. Especially after seeing:
General Purpose, Low Power Supercomputing Using Reconfiguration
: Re: FPGA
Tim Newsom wrote:
Bah! I meant to copy the list on that question.
Thanks for the answer though. Maybe someone else can also help
clarify? I thought fpga were basically PLDs and that they worked
exactly the same. I didn't know they lose config without power and
need
On 12/6/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 12/5/06, Markus Stehr [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What do you think about giving the Neo1973 a FPGA?
I was thinking more about this last night. My first reaction was great, but
as someone else posted, what do you get for the increased
4 matches
Mail list logo
