Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-27 Thread Audrius Meskauskas
OK, the gpv project will focus on a built - in maps in the future. We 
count on a 8 Gb micro SD that should be more than enough to cover the 
area of the planned trip.


Audrius.


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-26 Thread john
Having read that patent I feel compelled to submit my latest idea to
the US patent office.

A turd on a stick

We claim:

1. It is a turd

2. It is a stick

insert evil laugh

On 25/01/2008, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Today I blogged about a company that has a patent on what  I would call the
 essence of putting a GPS in a cell phone.

 I provided some details on the patent in my blog, but the essence of the
 story is covered in this excerpt:

 It appears that, in essence, the patents cover a phone providing current
 location information to a remote database which returns to the phone a
 collection of location centric information. According to the patent
 application, this location centric information could include real estate
 information, such as homes, condominiums, etc, but also parks, restaurant
 menus, services offered, hotels, hotel availability, and on and on.

 This, it appears, is an incredibly broad patent with major implications.

 Hank
 --
 -
 whydoeseverythingsuck.com
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-26 Thread Stroller


On 25 Jan 2008, at 23:17, joerg wrote:

...
Hmm... The patent purports to cover getting *any* information  
based on

where you are, including maps. So unless all the map information or
whatever information you need can fit on your phone you are not
interested in it? I guess you better wait for some *really* big flash
memory chips. :)
The maps ARE on board for all common GPS car navis (really big  
256MB-flash
card e.g.). When i need to download e.g. a new country, because  
traveling

from Germany to Spain, this info isn't based on sending my actual
GPS-position to a database.


Hi there,

Google already offers a maps application for cell phones.

Just like the web-based app, the version for my Sony Ericsson P990i  
downloads only images for the area surrounding your search target,  
and downloads additional images as you scroll the viewing area.


This Google maps application supports GPS on Windows Mobile-based  
cellphones - I'd been inclined to assume that the Neo will be  
supported shortly after its release - and this would seem to be  
either infringing or prior art.


Stroller.




___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 7:11 PM, joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  In other words, like it or not, if this patent is valid (who knows)
  and its scope is what it looks like (I'm not a lawyer) it will have a
  significant impact on the *phone* world.
 In other words, *you* consider GTA to be a *phone*, nothing else and not
 beyond. You're kidding?
 Like it or not, the GTA/OpenMoko is a *computer* with built in GSM-modem, and
 i don't think many of the customers will opt for an off-board solution that
 fails when leaving GSM coverage area,

Well, currently, there are *millions* of phones that ship *every
month* in the configuration I am describing and *none* that ship in
the configuration you are describing. So what customers are
*currently* doing is the thing that you are saying people wont opt
for. Better tell Apple and RIM (and probably others) to stop selling
all those phones - Oh, excuse me... computers. lol.

Hank

-- 
-
whydoeseverythingsuck.com

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
I'm puzzled why you responded *twice* to the same email. And I'm sure
somehow you missed the email that was actually a response to your
first answer.

Again, since you seem to have missed it. The thing that you say no one
will opt for (over the air maps), is the way that millions of phones
per month are shipped from Apple and RIM today. Therefore the
configuration is highly relevant to the *current* phone market.

Hank

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg
http://www.tomtom.com/products/features.php?ID=280Category=2Lid=1

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 8:14 PM, Shawn Rutledge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 On Jan 25, 2008 5:42 PM, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
  Again, since you seem to have missed it. The thing that you say no one
  will opt for (over the air maps), is the way that millions of phones
  per month are shipped from Apple and RIM today. Therefore the
  configuration is highly relevant to the *current* phone market.

 The point that you are missing is that Openmoko doesn't have to do
 everything the same way Apple and RIM do them;

Of course no one has to do anything the way Apple and RIM do it. I
think you are missing *my* point. My initial post was that there is a
patent that has an effect on the most common usage pattern for
location based tools for mobile devices.

The odd position, it seems to me, is to suggest that no one should be
concerned about a very popular device usage pattern. Obviously there
are lots of ways to design things, but to suggest that one very
popular way (in fact the primary way) people are doing something is of
*no concern* would seem to me to be a myopic attitude. My goal is to
provide information. The idea of suggesting that that information
doesn't matter which is what Joerg said, is really well... I wont
say. I am not sure why providing information should be something that
disturbs people so. If its not relevant to you, ignore it.

Hank

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread Gilles Casse

Hi,

Today, as already mentioned, Navit can use embedded maps from 
OpenStreetMap or proprietary maps. Since France is not yet very 
detailled in OSM, I am using an european map bought online, more than 
2GB of flash are needed.


Nevertheless, even with these data, it would be interesting to 
dynamically populate the map using an external database (for example 
cinema currently playing a film, etc...).


I met also recently such issues in looking naively for possible haptic 
applications, for example simply activating the vibrator when a key is 
pressed. It seems there is a wall in this realm (search keyphrase: 
haptic patent portfolio). Is such a simple feature legal or not in a 
free software? what are the bounds (countries, features) ?  Without 
clear advices, sadly some development in this area will be delayed or 
even not started.


Gilles


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread ian douglas

hank williams wrote:

Hmm... ok, so it comes with it but you cant use it without paying?


You can use TeleNav if you know where you are and where you're going. 
You only have to pay the extra $10 for the TeleNav service to use the 
GPS on the phone. Without the GPS, it'll still give you the turn-by-turn 
directions, but you have to manually advance the steps (much like Google 
Maps) as you travel.


-id


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg
let's move this thread to blackberry, iPhone, or google forum. I think we're 
boring others here, because this is the *OpenMoko* forum, and i don't see how 
the 'impact on *current* phone market' -however highly intriguing- has 
anything in common with what we are talking here: **GTA**

j

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread ian douglas

hank williams wrote:

I don't think any phones are going to come with
navigation data built in.


To my knowldge, the Samsung Blackjack 2 from ATT includes maps from 
TeleNav. You have to pay an extra $10/month to use GPS with those maps 
of course, so I just use the Mobile Google Maps application which uses 
the GPS on the Blackjack 2 just fine.


-id



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg
  The maps ARE on board for all common GPS car navis (really big
  256MB-flash card e.g.).

 In *cars*, not phones. 
btw: there have been on-board(!) navi solutions for phones(!) even before 
iPhone hit the market.

 This is the *Openmoko* list. We're talking 
 *phones* here. 
Sure bout that?

 I don't think any phones are going to come with 
 navigation data built in. 
Good point. In fact you have to buy the software separately. see TomTom e.g.

 For example Blackberrys have GPS but do not 
 have the maps built in. That data comes from the network. Same with
 the new iPhone functionality, which uses Google Maps. 
So what?

 And I presume no 
 Openmoko phones are going to ship with location data. 
I hope so! I'm not eager to pay for data i might never use. But OM/GTA ships 
with card-slot for data cards.
OTOH i'm sure GTA never will ship with a software that inevitably is sending 
my GPS data to any outside database. What means this patent to OM/me than??
This is the *Openmoko* list. We're talking GTA here, not business models of 
service providers like google-maps. Will my GTA break, when google gets 
involved in a lawsuit about some patent?

 Your personal
 feelings about how location data should be used don't really map to
 the way most expect to use phone + gps technology.
Now you're absolutely sure here?


j

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 7:47 PM, ian douglas [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 hank williams wrote:
  I don't think any phones are going to come with
  navigation data built in.

 To my knowldge, the Samsung Blackjack 2 from ATT includes maps from
 TeleNav. You have to pay an extra $10/month to use GPS with those maps
 of course, so I just use the Mobile Google Maps application which uses
 the GPS on the Blackjack 2 just fine.


Hmm... ok, so it comes with it but you cant use it without paying?
Thats kinda like not coming with isnt it?

In any case so you are, as I suggest most will, using Google Maps.
Which is indeed the point. The patent I am referring to relates to
this over-the-air maps scenario, which is, as far as I can tell, the
dominant scenario on cell phones.

Hank.

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 6:17 PM, joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
  Hmm... The patent purports to cover getting *any* information based on
  where you are, including maps. So unless all the map information or
  whatever information you need can fit on your phone you are not
  interested in it? I guess you better wait for some *really* big flash
  memory chips. :)
 The maps ARE on board for all common GPS car navis (really big 256MB-flash
 card e.g.).

In *cars*, not phones. This is the *Openmoko* list. We're talking
*phones* here. I don't think any phones are going to come with
navigation data built in. For example Blackberrys have GPS but do not
have the maps built in. That data comes from the network. Same with
the new iPhone functionality, which uses Google Maps. And I presume no
Openmoko phones are going to ship with location data. So while none of
this may be relevant to you, this discussion is about (at least in my
mind) the modern phone technology and how to apply it. Your personal
feelings about how location data should be used don't really map to
the way most expect to use phone + gps technology.

In other words, like it or not, if this patent is valid (who knows)
and its scope is what it looks like (I'm not a lawyer) it will have a
significant impact on the *phone* world.

Hank

Hank
-- 
-
whydoeseverythingsuck.com

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg

 Hmm... The patent purports to cover getting *any* information based on
 where you are, including maps. So unless all the map information or
 whatever information you need can fit on your phone you are not
 interested in it? I guess you better wait for some *really* big flash
 memory chips. :)
The maps ARE on board for all common GPS car navis (really big 256MB-flash 
card e.g.). When i need to download e.g. a new country, because traveling 
from Germany to Spain, this info isn't based on sending my actual 
GPS-position to a database. So their patent is not applicable anyway. 
The so called off board solutions, where you have to pay for each route or a 
monthly fee, night be affected, but i don't mind. It's the provider who has 
to pay in this case.

j

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg
Am Fr  25. Januar 2008 schrieb hank williams:
[...]
 It appears that, in essence, the patents cover a phone providing current
 location information to a remote database which returns to the phone a
 collection of location centric information. According to the patent
 application, this location centric information could include real estate
 information, such as homes, condominiums, etc, but also parks, restaurant
 menus, services offered, hotels, hotel availability, and on and on.

Whatever they might have (or think they have) with this patent, i don't mind. 
I *never* will give away GPS-data from my private cell phone to a centralized 
database, may it be google, TomTom, or whoever. I like my privacy, and even 
hate being traced by GSM-cell handover right now for 6 months storage of data 
in whole europe right since start of year. :-( And even less i need location 
centric info based on this DB.
Anyway the whole thing is a hoax. Probably this scenario was in the 
application papers they handed out the men with the money when they tried to 
get GPS up and running, way back last millenium.

j

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 8:33 PM, joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 http://www.tomtom.com/products/features.php?ID=280Category=2Lid=1



Now I guess I should post a link to an iPhone commercial.

Hank

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread joerg

 In other words, like it or not, if this patent is valid (who knows)
 and its scope is what it looks like (I'm not a lawyer) it will have a
 significant impact on the *phone* world.
In other words, *you* consider GTA to be a *phone*, nothing else and not 
beyond. You're kidding?
Like it or not, the GTA/OpenMoko is a *computer* with built in GSM-modem, and 
i don't think many of the customers will opt for an off-board solution that 
fails when leaving GSM coverage area, while they got the cpu-power to 
calculate the route and may *easily* feed the hilarious amount of 256MB map 
data to their 4GB local storage, thus saving the 1.5$ per server-side route 
calculation off-board.

This patent might have impact on future forms of advertisement, or even on 
the fee you have to pay for off-board route calculation (if you think you 
need such a stupid thing), but i don't feel it will influence any of the 
things i ever could imagine i plan to do with a GSM enabled PDA.

j

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread Tim Shannon
I'm all for companies trying to sue based on broad patents like this.  The
more broad and ridiculous they are, the better. Maybe people will start
opening their eyes to all of the troubles in our current patent system.

On Jan 25, 2008 1:00 PM, hank williams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

 Today I blogged about a 
 companyhttp://whydoeseverythingsuck.com/2008/01/are-apple-rim-and-google-all.htmlthat
  has a patent on what  I would call the essence of putting a GPS in a
 cell phone.

 I provided some details on the patent in my blog, but the essence of the
 story is covered in this excerpt:

 It appears that, in essence, the patents cover a phone providing current
 location information to a remote database which returns to the phone a
 collection of location centric information. According to the patent
 application, this location centric information could include real estate
 information, such as homes, condominiums, etc, but also parks, restaurant
 menus, services offered, hotels, hotel availability, and on and on.

 This, it appears, is an incredibly broad patent with major implications.

 Hank
 --
 -
 whydoeseverythingsuck.com
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: GPS/Cell phone patent issue

2008-01-25 Thread hank williams
On Jan 25, 2008 5:37 PM, joerg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 Am Fr  25. Januar 2008 schrieb hank williams:
 [...]
  It appears that, in essence, the patents cover a phone providing current
  location information to a remote database which returns to the phone a
  collection of location centric information. According to the patent
  application, this location centric information could include real estate
  information, such as homes, condominiums, etc, but also parks, restaurant
  menus, services offered, hotels, hotel availability, and on and on.

 Whatever they might have (or think they have) with this patent, i don't mind.
 I *never* will give away GPS-data from my private cell phone to a centralized
 database, may it be google, TomTom, or whoever. I like my privacy, and even
 hate being traced by GSM-cell handover right now for 6 months storage of data
 in whole europe right since start of year. :-( And even less i need location
 centric info based on this DB.

Hmm... The patent purports to cover getting *any* information based on
where you are, including maps. So unless all the map information or
whatever information you need can fit on your phone you are not
interested in it? I guess you better wait for some *really* big flash
memory chips. :)

Hank


-
whydoeseverythingsuck.com

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community