Is it possible for community to take up the development(improvement) of qt
extended?
On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 2:42 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
http://www.qtsoftware.com/about/news/qt-software-discontinues-qt-extended
___
Openmoko
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 11:42 AM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
http://www.qtsoftware.com/about/news/qt-software-discontinues-qt-extended
It says some features will be migrated into Qt itself. I assume that
means Nokia doesn't see a need for some of the low-level open-source
-Original Message-
From: community-boun...@lists.openmoko.org
[mailto:community-boun...@lists.openmoko.org] On Behalf Of
Shawn Rutledge
Sent: Wednesday, March 04, 2009 9:34 AM
To: List for Openmoko community discussion
Subject: Re: Qt Software discontinues Qt Extended
On Tue, Mar 3
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
No public list available, but probably none of the applications in Qt
Extended will go into Qt. Just backend/classes kind of thing.
What about the ability to run Qt on a framebuffer as opposed to X?
Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On Tue, Mar 3, 2009 at 4:36 PM, Lorn Potter lpot...@trolltech.com wrote:
No public list available, but probably none of the applications in Qt
Extended will go into Qt. Just backend/classes kind of thing.
What about the ability to run Qt on a framebuffer as opposed to
xChris wrote:
Is there any future plan for the QTcreator to produce Qt extended
applications?
Only if someone in the community adds this.
___
Openmoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
Lorn Potter wrote:
http://www.qtsoftware.com/about/news/qt-software-discontinues-qt-extended
That's very sad. :(
*resists the urge to shout very loud abuse*
--
www.tdobson.net
If each of us have one object, and we exchange them, then each of us
still has one object.
If each of us have
7 matches
Mail list logo
