And if it frees up
developer resources to doing just hardware and kernel support by not
doing a huge effort like OE-based Om2007.2/Om2008/Om2009 on the
software distribution, I'm all for it.
hmmm.
on htcdream, having something half-usable was so hard...
for instance:
No alsa driver shipped
Hi,
I have been watching the conversation about Android and its openness,
and I think that Timo's answer is the closest.
You should also remember that while Android is associated with Google,
and certainly they had the greatest say of it, that other companies of
the Open Handset Alliance also
[cut]
and finally Google (one ring to bind them all) the drum-beater. But
like a lot of drum-beaters, they could only beat the drumthey were
bound by contracts and agreements to do things. Even the mighty Google
can not do everything they want to do.
Great summary :)
[cut]
--
Patryk
On 20 Aug 2010 10:55:00 +0200
openm...@pulster.de (Christoph Pulster) (CP) wrote:
Google can not do everything they want to do.
They photograph my home without my permission,
anyone can photo your house without your permission. as for google,
afaik you can file a request not to be displayed.
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Pulster openm...@pulster.de wrote:
Please note Android is a Google(TM) product. TM stands for total
monopol. Or terrible monster. Google is evil. Android is no free OS.
By what definition of free is Android not a free OS?
Jim
Please note Android is a Google(TM) product. TM stands for total
monopol. Or terrible monster. Google is evil. Android is no free OS.
By what definition of free is Android not a free OS?
by free as in speech.
it's not 100% open -- important parts of the os, namely hw drivers, are
closed.
Please note Linux is a Torvalds (TM). TM stands for total monopol. Or
terrible monster.
Torvalds is evil. Linux is no free OS.
huh ?
ok, troll. please, lets leave him there.
dont respond to this mail !
$2c,
*-pike
___
Openmoko community
On Thursday 19 August 2010, Jim Ancona wrote:
On Sat, Aug 14, 2010 at 5:58 AM, Christoph Pulster openm...@pulster.de
wrote:
Please note Android is a Google(TM) product. TM stands for total
monopol. Or terrible monster. Google is evil. Android is no free OS.
By what definition of free is
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:43 PM, arne anka openm...@ginguppin.de wrote:
Please note Android is a Google(TM) product. TM stands for total
monopol. Or terrible monster. Google is evil. Android is no free OS.
By what definition of free is Android not a free OS?
by free as in speech.
it's not
2010/8/20 Jim Ancona j...@anconafamily.com:
True with respect to most phones, because hardware manufacturers don't
release their drivers. Not true with respect to the Freerunner. In any
case, Android is exactly as free as Linux is, because you would have
exactly the same problem running any
2010/8/14 Christoph Pulster openm...@pulster.de:
PS: I heard on IRC something about next Openmoko phone running
Android. I think, it's a good idea.
Please note Android is a Google(TM) product. TM stands for total
monopol. Or terrible monster. Google is evil. Android is no free OS.
I agree.
Am 13.08.2010 um 17:08 schrieb Martix:
Hi community,
I want to share a few news about WikiReader and Openmoko Inc. I am
publishing with permission my short interview with Sean Moss-Pultz the
CEO of Openmoko Inc.:
___
May I
12 matches
Mail list logo
