On 7/25/07, Steven ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um... That doesn't seem to get Gmail to thread the messages at all. You're
solution is Just don't use Gmail. Duh!. That's not a valid answer to my
question. Before you suggest it, the following is also an invalid response:
use Outlook or
You are talking about flat, web forum style threading, though. What he wants
is tree style threading like in the ML archives, Slashdot comments etc.
Ortwin
On 7/26/07, vivek khurana [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 7/25/07, Steven ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Um... That doesn't seem to get Gmail
Ehrm.. try looking at the settings, maybe you habe simply deactivated it.
Because for me it works pretty fine with the threated view.
oh, yes, and by the way, the possibility to format text and include
images/links/wathever would be really good for the average user.
On 7/25/07, Steven ** [EMAIL
I've been mostly silent in this discussion (partially because it's taken me
two days to catch up on it), but I have some thoughts/questions.
The gist of the argument for email seems to be:
1. You can download all the messages and view them offline
2. Standalone email clients group messages by
On 7/25/07, Steven ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, my questions:
1. Is there a way to get Gmail to thread the messages based on who it was
in response to?
Yup, admins can set archiving at www.gmane.org. This way you will have
archiving as well as threaded view
regards
VK
Um... That doesn't seem to get Gmail to thread the messages at all. You're
solution is Just don't use Gmail. Duh!. That's not a valid answer to my
question. Before you suggest it, the following is also an invalid response:
use Outlook or Thunderbird and download all your messages via POP.
I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, then, why not have forums for people who want them, and leave email
for people who don't want them? The thing is, it doesn't work very well in
practice. If experience is any guide, then the technically knowledgable
people will use email, and won't waste
7 matches
Mail list logo
