Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-28 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
Well, as stupid that sounds, without signing a contract, you won't get
a SIM from them. And I do know, that there are really stupid carriers
(e.g. drei.at) that insist on the 24-months contract binding time,
even if you don't take the subsidy. Guess the US carriers are even
more evil, because they in fact have no regulation nor competition to
reign them in.

(btw, using a prepaid card involves legally speaking a contract too,
it's just that the contract is not signed, only executed by doing.
Plus prepaid data costs are not very attractive.)

Andreas


* Steven ** [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070228 15:05]:
 Why would you sign a contract?  My understanding was that the only
 benefit to a contract was a subsidized phone.  If you're using the
 Neo1973, you're not going to need that crippled, subsidized phone.
 Then, since you're not bound by a ridiculous contract, you could
 switch to another provider if they tried to restrict your data usage.
 
 -Steven
 
 On 2/27/07, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
 
 The part that scares me about the Data Connect is the wording at the
 top-level data page that includes the phrase Requires usage with a
 Cingular Wireless PDA.
 
 
  http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/data-cell-phone-plans.jsp?_requestid=82997_requestid=104169
 
  Data Connect
 
  Access your e-mail, corporate intranet, and the Internet while on
  the go by wirelessly connecting your PDA to the
  Internet. Requires usage with a Cingular Wireless PDA. Service is
  not available at all times in all places. View Map and Coverage
  Limitations.  View all 4 Data Connect Cingular Plans
 
 I'm a bit worried that they will accept the 2-contract only to turn
 around after a few weeks and point out that this plan only allows me
 to use a Cingular PDA.
 
 The Smartphone Connect only talks about browsing the internet.
 That has the potential liability that they only allow a proxied
 port-80/tcp connection and nothing else.
 
 Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but I recall the same thing
 happened with cable internet service.  Running a server initially
 just meant running a server that was serving lots of people.  Before
 the year was over it came to mean running your own sendmail which only
 accepted mail for yourself.
 
 -wolfgang
 
 
 Steven ** writes:
  Seems like you'd want either the Data Connect plan
  (http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service//cell-phone-plans/data-connect-plans.jsp)
  or the Smartphone Connect plan
  (http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service//cell-phone-plans/smartphone-connect-plans.jsp).
  I'd go with the Smartphone Connect unlimited for $20.
 --
 Wolfgang S. Rupprecht  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISN: 6001*308
 
 
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-28 Thread Andreas Kostyrka
* Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] [070228 00:06]:
 
 Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
  Yep saw that in Slashdot, bit of confusion are they cracking down on
  existing data levels for cheaper data offerings (something called TZones
  or similar) or if totally banning.
 
  Point is, vote with your feet and go to cingular or someone else.
 
 I tried my best to understand the 8+ different Cingular data offerings
 and it seems at first glance that each of them either requires using a
 device bought from Cingular or approved by name (eg. the various
 Blackberry planes) 
 
 
 http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/data-cell-phone-plans.jsp?_requestid=82997

Well, the Smartphone, Data and Laptop plans should work. OTOH, it's
basic stupidity, because they seem to sell the same product
unlimited internet access with different prices depending upon which
device you insert your SIM card into. So IANAL, but I guess you should
be ok to use the Smartphone plan, as the Neo is a smartphone ;)

The problem, why this is stupid, is the fact that many smartphones
allow sharing the internet access to a laptop via Bluetooth. They can
disable this on their own enhanced brand phones, but buying the same
phone from the manufacturer will include this subversive features.
(btw, that makes sometimes sense, because my phone has better
reception than my UMTS data card.)

GPRS/UMTS offers basically one way to differate data offerings, by
offering different APNs (access point names). E.g. my phone offers
basically three APNs (Blackberry, T-Mobile MMS, Internet). Blackberry
will probably connect you to a special network garden, that allows for
pushing email. MMS allows sending/receiving MMS. And internet is
basically a NAT-ed internet access.

Now offering the same network destination (Internet) with different
prices attached depending upon the device used is a creative way for
the legal department, but it's hard to implement network-wise. The
only thing would be that Cingular only allows connecting via
pre-authenticated EMEI-identified phones. Haven't heard yet that they
do this to their customers.

The alternate way would be to log the EMEI, decode (if that's at all
possible) what device it is, and later sue your customer. (If that's
their strategy, I guess that they had help from some SCO managers on
the dole ;) )

Andreas

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-27 Thread justin hugh daly

fta:

   but their hypocrisy is painfully clear when you
   remember that these apps work fine on T-Mobile's
   network, using T-Mobile SIM cards, if you buy your
   phone directly from a manufacturer like
   NokiaUSA.com [or fic ;)].

caveat emptor -- don't buy your phone from t-mobile

hurray for openmoko!

cheers
daly

On 2/27/07, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:



It appears that T-Mobile has just started banning third-party
applications from running on phones they provide cellular service to.
Grumble.  Before this they seemed to have the best GSM deal in this
part of the world (San Francisco Bay Area, USA).

http://www.gearlog.com/2007/01/tmobile_disses_opera_says_get.php

This means T-Mobile feature phone users are prohibited from
surfing the Web with Opera Mini, checking maps on Google Local for
Mobile, listening to podcasts with Mobilcast, and using any other
form of software not pre-approved by T-Mobile.

I wonder how they'll react to an open phone where code like this comes
as a factory option.

-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


RE: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-27 Thread Dean Collins
Yep saw that in Slashdot, bit of confusion are they cracking down on
existing data levels for cheaper data offerings (something called TZones
or similar) or if totally banning.

Point is, vote with your feet and go to cingular or someone else.



 

Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-212-203-4357 Ph
+1-917-207-3420 Mb
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).


 -Original Message-
 From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
 [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
 Sent: Tuesday, 27 February 2007 2:26 PM
 To: community@lists.openmoko.org
 Subject: t-mobile bans user's own apps
 
 
 It appears that T-Mobile has just started banning third-party
 applications from running on phones they provide cellular service to.
 Grumble.  Before this they seemed to have the best GSM deal in this
 part of the world (San Francisco Bay Area, USA).
 
 http://www.gearlog.com/2007/01/tmobile_disses_opera_says_get.php
 
 This means T-Mobile feature phone users are prohibited from
 surfing the Web with Opera Mini, checking maps on Google Local for
 Mobile, listening to podcasts with Mobilcast, and using any other
 form of software not pre-approved by T-Mobile.
 
 I wonder how they'll react to an open phone where code like this comes
 as a factory option.
 
 -wolfgang
 --
 Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
 
 
 ___
 OpenMoko community mailing list
 community@lists.openmoko.org
 http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-27 Thread Aaron Coats

I have T-mobile and an SDA.
They are not banning applications from their network, they just  
aren't letting the cheapest account use them.  I pay for the 29/month  
data plan and my 3rd party apps work just fine.  (Google maps and my  
funambol mail sync application)  This is over hyped sensationalzed  
crap.  If you want data service you have to pay for it.


-Aaron

On Feb 27, 2007, at 11:48 AM, Dean Collins wrote:


Yep saw that in Slashdot, bit of confusion are they cracking down on
existing data levels for cheaper data offerings (something called  
TZones

or similar) or if totally banning.

Point is, vote with your feet and go to cingular or someone else.





Regards,

Dean Collins
Cognation Pty Ltd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
+1-212-203-4357 Ph
+1-917-207-3420 Mb
+61-2-9016-5642 (Sydney in-dial).



-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:community-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wolfgang S. Rupprecht
Sent: Tuesday, 27 February 2007 2:26 PM
To: community@lists.openmoko.org
Subject: t-mobile bans user's own apps


It appears that T-Mobile has just started banning third-party
applications from running on phones they provide cellular service to.
Grumble.  Before this they seemed to have the best GSM deal in this
part of the world (San Francisco Bay Area, USA).

http://www.gearlog.com/2007/01/tmobile_disses_opera_says_get.php

This means T-Mobile feature phone users are prohibited from
surfing the Web with Opera Mini, checking maps on Google Local  
for

Mobile, listening to podcasts with Mobilcast, and using any other
form of software not pre-approved by T-Mobile.

I wonder how they'll react to an open phone where code like this  
comes

as a factory option.

-wolfgang
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-27 Thread Wolfgang S. Rupprecht

Dean Collins [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
 Yep saw that in Slashdot, bit of confusion are they cracking down on
 existing data levels for cheaper data offerings (something called TZones
 or similar) or if totally banning.

 Point is, vote with your feet and go to cingular or someone else.

I tried my best to understand the 8+ different Cingular data offerings
and it seems at first glance that each of them either requires using a
device bought from Cingular or approved by name (eg. the various
Blackberry planes) 


http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/data-cell-phone-plans.jsp?_requestid=82997

-wolfgang
-- 
Wolfgang S. Rupprechthttp://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/


___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community


Re: t-mobile bans user's own apps

2007-02-27 Thread Steven **

Why would you sign a contract?  My understanding was that the only
benefit to a contract was a subsidized phone.  If you're using the
Neo1973, you're not going to need that crippled, subsidized phone.
Then, since you're not bound by a ridiculous contract, you could
switch to another provider if they tried to restrict your data usage.

-Steven

On 2/27/07, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:


The part that scares me about the Data Connect is the wording at the
top-level data page that includes the phrase Requires usage with a
Cingular Wireless PDA.


http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service/cell-phone-plans/data-cell-phone-plans.jsp?_requestid=82997_requestid=104169

 Data Connect

 Access your e-mail, corporate intranet, and the Internet while on
 the go by wirelessly connecting your PDA to the
 Internet. Requires usage with a Cingular Wireless PDA. Service is
 not available at all times in all places. View Map and Coverage
 Limitations.  View all 4 Data Connect Cingular Plans

I'm a bit worried that they will accept the 2-contract only to turn
around after a few weeks and point out that this plan only allows me
to use a Cingular PDA.

The Smartphone Connect only talks about browsing the internet.
That has the potential liability that they only allow a proxied
port-80/tcp connection and nothing else.

Perhaps I'm reading too much into it, but I recall the same thing
happened with cable internet service.  Running a server initially
just meant running a server that was serving lots of people.  Before
the year was over it came to mean running your own sendmail which only
accepted mail for yourself.

-wolfgang


Steven ** writes:
 Seems like you'd want either the Data Connect plan
 
(http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service//cell-phone-plans/data-connect-plans.jsp)
 or the Smartphone Connect plan
 
(http://www.cingular.com/cell-phone-service//cell-phone-plans/smartphone-connect-plans.jsp).
 I'd go with the Smartphone Connect unlimited for $20.
--
Wolfgang S. Rupprecht  [EMAIL PROTECTED]  http://www.wsrcc.com/wolfgang/
   sip:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ISN: 6001*308



___
OpenMoko community mailing list
community@lists.openmoko.org
http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community