Re: WiFi issue in Qtmoko v44 for Freerunner

2012-04-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org writes: It's not possible to connect to closed wireless networks in v44 because it seems to reset the encription settings every time it tries to authenticate. Anyone having the same issue out there? Any fix around? :) I personally use the following script

Re: WiFi issue in Qtmoko v44 for Freerunner

2012-04-21 Thread Timo Juhani Lindfors
Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi writes: I personally use the following script to connect to WiFi. If you replace ESSID and PASSWORD it might help you. Oh and you also might want to replace wlan with eth0 or whatever you call your wifi interface.

Re: WiFi issue in Qtmoko v44 for Freerunner

2012-04-21 Thread urodelo
Hello. Wifi isn't working on my fr v44 too, same situation, closed wifi where before I could connect to. urodelo On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 05:16:23 +0200, Tiago Bortoletto Vaz ti...@debian.org wrote: Hi Radek, Freerunners, It's not possible to connect to closed wireless networks in v44

Re: WiFi issue in Qtmoko v44 for Freerunner

2012-04-21 Thread Tiago Bortoletto Vaz
On Sat, 21 Apr 2012 12:02:51 +0300, Timo Juhani Lindfors wrote Timo Juhani Lindfors timo.lindf...@iki.fi writes: I personally use the following script to connect to WiFi. If you replace ESSID and PASSWORD it might help you. Oh and you also might want to replace wlan with eth0 or whatever

Re: WiFi issue in Qtmoko v44 for Freerunner

2012-04-21 Thread Radek Polak
On Saturday 21 April 2012 03:16:23 Tiago Bortoletto Vaz wrote: It's not possible to connect to closed wireless networks in v44 because it seems to reset the encription settings every time it tries to authenticate. Anyone having the same issue out there? Any fix around? :) Hi, i think i

Re: WiFi-Tool (or GPRS-Tool modified)

2009-10-06 Thread Paul Fertser
Esteban Monge esteban.franci...@gmail.com writes:     def wifi_on(self, button):         os.system(mdbus -s org.freesmartphone.odeviced /org/freesmartphone/Device/PowerControl/WiFi org.freesmartphone.Resource.Enable) Are you sure you know exactly what FSO resources concept is about and have

Re: WiFi-Tool (or GPRS-Tool modified)

2009-10-06 Thread Petr Vanek
On Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:09:19 -0600 Esteban Monge esteban.franci...@gmail.com (EM) wrote: Hello I readed this page: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/FSO_Resources You suggest use the command fsoraw -r WiFi if you for example enable wifi via shr-settings and then use any script that uses fso-raw by

Re: WiFi-Tool (or GPRS-Tool modified)

2009-10-06 Thread Esteban Monge
def set_status(self, label): status = os.system(ifconfig eth0) if status == 0: status = WiFi Power On label.set_text(status) label.modify_fg(gtk.STATE_NORMAL, gtk.gdk.color_parse(green)) else: status = WiFi Power Off

Re: WiFi-Tool (or GPRS-Tool modified)

2009-10-05 Thread Esteban Monge
Hello I readed this page: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/FSO_Resources You suggest use the command fsoraw -r WiFi -- http://nuevaeracr.blogspot.com Linux user number 478378 Linux machine number 386687 Tec. Esteban Monge Marín Tel: (506) 8379-3562 “No habrá manera de desarrollarnos y salir de

Re: WiFi-Tool (or GPRS-Tool modified)

2009-10-05 Thread Paul Fertser
Esteban Monge esteban.franci...@gmail.com writes: Hello I  readed this page: http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/FSO_Resources You suggest use the command fsoraw -r WiFi For shell scripts, yes. For your own programs you can call RequestResource and ReleaseResource directly. HTH -- Be free, use

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-05 Thread Paul Fertser
Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Paul Fertserfercer...@gmail.com wrote: Can you confirm it's a regression and if yes, in which version it did work without issues? I cannot confirm, I always had problem in some ways. It may be only due the fact that as

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 1:08 PM, Paul Fertserfercer...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, I remember you were testing the fsoraw method and indeed proved that it doesn't work properly with the latest kernel. After some discussion we reverted the offending patch and now the latest SHR kernel should provide

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread arne anka
I remember you were testing the fsoraw method and indeed proved that it doesn't work properly with the latest kernel. After some discussion we reverted the offending patch and now the latest SHR kernel should provide the same level of stability as .28. Please try again and report the

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Vinzenz Hersche
Am Freitag, 4. September 2009 13.08:05 schrieb Paul Fertser: Hi, I remember you were testing the fsoraw method and indeed proved that it doesn't work properly with the latest kernel. After some discussion we reverted the offending patch and now the latest SHR kernel should provide the same

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Paul Fertser
Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I built a3587e4ed77974adfb057af261aaeea4022018e8 and commented the HTC line suggested in your patch Oh no! We reverted Werner's patch and with that nothing should be commented, it should work as is. And yes, you're building andy-tracking HEAD, that's

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Paul Fertser
Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I remember you were testing the fsoraw method and indeed proved that it doesn't work properly with the latest kernel. After some discussion we reverted the offending patch and now the latest SHR kernel should provide the same level of stability as .28.

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread William Kenworthy
That link looks like its only 762 bytes - somethings wrong? On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:21 +0400, Paul Fertser wrote: Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I remember you were testing the fsoraw method and indeed proved that it doesn't work properly with the latest kernel. After some

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread William Kenworthy
my mistake - looks like a meta-package ... :( BillK On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 21:29 +0800, William Kenworthy wrote: That link looks like its only 762 bytes - somethings wrong? On Fri, 2009-09-04 at 16:21 +0400, Paul Fertser wrote: Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I remember you

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 2:14 PM, Paul Fertserfercer...@gmail.com wrote: Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I built a3587e4ed77974adfb057af261aaeea4022018e8 and commented the HTC line suggested in your patch Oh no! We reverted Werner's patch and with that nothing should be commented, it

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Paul Fertser
Hi, Thanks for the feedback. On Fri, Sep 04, 2009 at 04:13:28PM +0200, Nicola Mfb wrote: Nicola Mfb nicola@gmail.com writes: I built a3587e4ed77974adfb057af261aaeea4022018e8 and commented the HTC line suggested in your patch andy-tracking HEAD, that's right revision. ... rebooted

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Paul Fertserfercer...@gmail.com wrote: [...] Quite interesting indeed. Can you possibly provide a way to reproduce it without nwa using some bash or minimal python script? Yes, I'll try with standard tools, anyway when nwa quits it remove eth0 from the list of

Re: Wifi driver stability improved -- wrong patch reverted

2009-09-04 Thread Nicola Mfb
On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 11:59 PM, Nicola Mfbnicola@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, Sep 4, 2009 at 10:07 PM, Paul Fertserfercer...@gmail.com wrote: [...] [...] Can you confirm it's a regression and if yes, in which version it did work without issues? I forgot to say an important thing: thanks for

Re: Wifi problems, WPA/WEP differences

2009-04-06 Thread Fox Mulder
Same here. 24 worked stable but 29 doesn't work at all. Connection to AP seems established but no data transfer between freerunner and AP with new kernels. Johny Tenfinger wrote: My AP worked well with .24 kernel. With .28 and .29 it doesn't (I've connected once for about month) 2009/4/5,

Re: Wifi problems, WPA/WEP differences (was: Re: [SHR] from debian to shr ; -))

2009-04-05 Thread Johny Tenfinger
My AP worked well with .24 kernel. With .28 and .29 it doesn't (I've connected once for about month) 2009/4/5, Paul Fertser fercer...@gmail.com: Cameron Frazier frazier.came...@gmail.com writes: On Sat, 2009-04-04 at 16:25 +0200, Davide Scaini wrote: ... i use a wep static ip network and a

Re: Wifi problems, WPA/WEP differences (was: Re: [SHR] from debian to shr ; -))

2009-04-05 Thread Dylan Semler
On Sun, Apr 5, 2009 at 4:13 AM, Johny Tenfinger seba.d...@gmail.com wrote: My AP worked well with .24 kernel. With .28 and .29 it doesn't (I've connected once for about month) I'm in this boat as well Dylan ___ Openmoko community mailing list

Re: wifi NOT work on fso-image

2009-02-24 Thread David Reyes Samblas Martinez
please search the list for wifi and fso milestone5 and you'll find the solution. If your are to lazy for that please follow this link http://n2.nabble.com/-FSO-milestone-5--No-wifi---td2333773ef1958.html#a2333773 2009/2/24 Daniel.Li lida_m...@163.com: Dear All, I just downloaded below

Re: Wifi - wep or wpa enabled

2008-12-19 Thread Xavier Bestel
Hi Rodney, On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 21:58 -0800, Rodney Myers wrote: Default install. Does the wifi work only with wpa? or does it also work with wep? My internal wifi is wep enabled only, and I cannot get the phone to recognize the key. In my experience none of the GUI tools work with

Re: Wifi - wep or wpa enabled

2008-12-19 Thread ant
On Friday 19 December 2008 05:58:06 Rodney Myers wrote: Default install. Does the wifi work only with wpa? or does it also work with wep? My internal wifi is wep enabled only, and I cannot get the phone to recognize the key. Way back when I first got my phone, on the factory install, I

Re: wifi using GUI in 2008.9

2008-12-08 Thread arne anka
My accesspoint is configured in wpa_supplicant, but the gui keeps asking me for the key. Should I just not fill it in then? dunno. never used any gui for wlan on the fr. but i'd expect any gui to checl with wpa_supplicant.conf first -- what your gui obviously not does. maybe grepping

Re: wifi using GUI in 2008.9

2008-12-07 Thread arne anka
Isn't there a way to preload the neo with the key via ssh in a config file? /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: wifi using GUI in 2008.9

2008-12-07 Thread Peter Nijs
On Sunday 07 December 2008 12:17:19 arne anka wrote: Isn't there a way to preload the neo with the key via ssh in a config file? /etc/wpa_supplicant/wpa_supplicant.conf My accesspoint is configured in wpa_supplicant, but the gui keeps asking me for the key. Should I just not fill it in

Re: wifi shelf gadget

2008-10-26 Thread Michael Sheldon
If I remember correctly the gadget is always there (just not visible), it gets reports from the wifiget application and only displays an icon when there's signal strength to report. It doesn't do anything to switch on/off the wifi it just constantly monitors it. You probably want to be looking

Re: wifi shelf gadget

2008-10-26 Thread pike
Hi thanks for the answer. You probably want to be looking at the Settings program to see what happens when wifi is switched on/off there (as that's actually switching the wifi chip on or off). Aha. Indeed, going to Settings/WIFI is the only way to make the icon appear that I know sofar.

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-30 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Friday 26 September 2008 19:18:43 Matthias Apitz wrote: I've typed in the key in the FR again and again but it always said after some time 'ERROR Unable to join network' Yeah, it looks like there is quite a bit of separation between all the different facilities. The 'Settings-Wifi' GUI

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-26 Thread Arigead
Thanks to everybody who relied to this thread you have given my much food for thought. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org http://lists.openmoko.org/mailman/listinfo/community

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-26 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 08:02:18PM +0100, Al Johnson escribió: I think the work that wpa_supplicant daemon does is only to control the association to the AP and bringing up the interface; then in FreeBSD a devd (device daemon) lets you describe what to do else, for example

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Christ van Willegen
Hello, On Thu, Sep 25, 2008 at 4:16 PM, Arigead [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've not tagged this email [2008.09] or anything. I'm using 2008.09 but I'll use this on any distro if it exists and if it has to be written I don't want to write it for a specific Distro. I think that at the moment the

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:16:43PM +0100, Arigead escribió: Hello all, I'm looking for an application which if it exists great and if it don't exist I'll maybe try and implement it in C, if what I'm thinking is even possible. I've not done too much investigating into

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Al Johnson
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:16:43PM +0100, Arigead escribió: Hello all, I'm looking for an application which if it exists great and if it don't exist I'll maybe try and implement it in C, if what I'm thinking is

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Matthias Apitz
El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:50:21PM +0100, Al Johnson escribió: On Thursday 25 September 2008, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:16:43PM +0100, Arigead escribió: Hello all, I'm looking for an application which if it exists great and

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Minh Ha Duong
launch a script when IF_UP; in this script you may, based on the MAC of the AP, do whatever is needed: ifconfig static IP or DHCP or a logic like that must exist in Debian too, I'm wrong? and this is not much scripting work, or? Yes, in Debian here is how I do it:

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread Al Johnson
On Thursday 25 September 2008, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:50:21PM +0100, Al Johnson escribió: On Thursday 25 September 2008, Matthias Apitz wrote: El día Thursday, September 25, 2008 a las 03:16:43PM +0100, Arigead escribió: Hello all,

Re: WIFI Connector Application

2008-09-25 Thread William Kenworthy
On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 15:16 +0100, Arigead wrote: Hello all, I'm looking for an application which if it exists great and if it don't exist I'll maybe try and implement it in C, if what I'm thinking is even possible. I've not done too much investigating into Wifi as I believe that it

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-12 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 00:18 +1000, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote: The solution is absurdly simple. Use udhcpc not dhclient. Both are installed on 2008.8, only udhcpc does the right thing. So .. it works, thanks, but as noted by Tore it works only once after a reboot. Even letting the FR suspend

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Tore Martin Hagen
The problem is not WLAN but the dhcp client, as you see you get a response, but then you send back a DHCPDECLINE. What you can do is to stop the dhcp client and then configure the interface manually. ifconfig eth0 192.168.4.180 netmask 255.255.255.0 /Tore Xavier Bestel wrote: Any hint ?

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 14:28 +0200, Tore Martin Hagen wrote: The problem is not WLAN but the dhcp client, as you see you get a response, but then you send back a DHCPDECLINE. What you can do is to stop the dhcp client and then configure the interface manually. ifconfig eth0 192.168.4.180

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Tore Martin Hagen
Hi If you manage to get a DHCP reply it means that the WIFI connection is OK. But my experience is that WIFI can only connect once. So to test out the setup I would reboot. Do the iwconfig then do the ifconfig with a know address and then see if you can ping. Is anyone else have problem to

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0200, Tore Martin Hagen wrote: Hi If you manage to get a DHCP reply it means that the WIFI connection is OK. But my experience is that WIFI can only connect once. So to test out the setup I would reboot. Do the iwconfig then do the ifconfig with a know

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Tore Martin Hagen
Now that's impractical, seeing how long the boot time is :( Ok, I'll try that. Or maybe some rmmod+modprobe first. The problem is that it is not a module. ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Christian Weßel
Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 15:51 +0200 schrieb Xavier Bestel: Ok, I'll try that. Or maybe some rmmod+modprobe first. Please report your results. -- mfg/br, christian Flurstraße 14 29640 Schneverdingen Germany E-Mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Telefon: +49 5193 97 14 95 Mobile: +49 171 357 59

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Alex (Maxious) Sadleir
The solution is absurdly simple. Use udhcpc not dhclient. Both are installed on 2008.8, only udhcpc does the right thing. For example... Dhclient: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# dhclient eth0 Internet Systems Consortium DHCP Client V3.0.2 Copyright 2004 Internet Systems Consortium. All rights reserved. For

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread William Kenworthy
Does iwconfig power on then iwconfig power off help? (turns powersaving on then off - somewhat counter-intuitive :) BillK On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:51 +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote: On Thu, 2008-09-11 at 15:39 +0200, Tore Martin Hagen wrote: Hi If you manage to get a DHCP reply it means

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Olivier Berger
Christian Weßel [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Am Donnerstag, den 11.09.2008, 15:51 +0200 schrieb Xavier Bestel: Ok, I'll try that. Or maybe some rmmod+modprobe first. Please report your results. Preferably on the support list ;-) Please, people, help triage message to appropriate lists.

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Xavier Bestel
On Fri, 2008-09-12 at 00:18 +1000, Alex (Maxious) Sadleir wrote: The solution is absurdly simple. Use udhcpc not dhclient. Both are installed on 2008.8, only udhcpc does the right thing. Thanks, I'll try when I'm back home (not today). Xav

Re: WiFi doesn't work

2008-09-11 Thread Marco Trevisan (Treviño)
Hi If you manage to get a DHCP reply it means that the WIFI connection is OK. But my experience is that WIFI can only connect once. So to test out the setup I would reboot. Do the iwconfig then do the ifconfig with a know address and then see if you can ping. Is anyone else have

Re: Wifi totally broken in Om2008.8?

2008-09-07 Thread Daniel Hedblom
This was what i found out yesterday. Setting the AP to 802.11g was the only way i could make it work. The sad part of this is that many public and other APs don't run 802.11g so this solution only helps on my own AP. Out of the house its not so easy to get a connection. 2008/5/14 Bryan DeLuca

Re: Wifi totally broken in Om2008.8?

2008-09-06 Thread Stefan Strahl
Hi Daniel :) I also had troubles first getting Wifi running with Om2008.08. What did you do so far to the config? I assume iwlist eth0 scan is working? My D'oh-experience was that I needed to use WPA2 in the wpa_supplicant.conf and not WPA. Here is what I did to get it running: 1) create

RE: Wifi totally broken in Om2008.8?

2008-09-06 Thread Bryan DeLuca
On Sat, 6 Sep 2008 17:13:26 +0200 Daniel Hedblom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Im trying to get wifi going on my freerunner but i havent got any success yet at all. I have tried the various tips in the wiki but whatever i do packets seems to end up in the bit-bucket. Even as ifconfig shows packets

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-29 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Friday 29 August 2008 15:29:52 Sarton O'Brien wrote: It's likely to be the nameserver issue most people experience. For some reason the nameserver obtained via udhcpc is not written to the symlinked location of resolv.conf (/var/run/resolv.conf). The raster image works brilliantly and this

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-29 Thread Jean-Eric Cuendet
The raster image works brilliantly and this doesn't seem to be a problem fyi. Is it Om2008.8 update from 25 august? Or is there some other image? Where? For anyone testing images, I've been through nearly all and the raster image updated using the official om2008 repos works very

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-29 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Friday 29 August 2008 17:01:36 Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: The raster image works brilliantly and this doesn't seem to be a problem fyi. Is it Om2008.8 update from 25 august? Or is there some other image? Where? Download the raster image for gta02 here:

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-29 Thread julien cubizolles
Le vendredi 29 août 2008 à 09:01 +0200, Jean-Eric Cuendet a écrit : The raster image works brilliantly and this doesn't seem to be a problem fyi. Is it Om2008.8 update from 25 august? Or is there some other image? Where? You can get it here :

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-28 Thread Robert William Hutton
Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: Hi, I'm unable to make the wifi working on my FR Could someone explain how to do it? http://wiki.openmoko.org/wiki/Neo_FreeRunner_Wifi Cheers, Rob ___ Openmoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: WIFI on FR

2008-08-28 Thread Sarton O'Brien
On Friday 29 August 2008 15:01:21 Jean-Eric Cuendet wrote: Hi, I'm unable to make the wifi working on my FR Could someone explain how to do it? I have an open access point, with DHCP. My laptop connects and works well with it. I go to Settings, then choose WIFI, then click on it : it passes

Re: wifi

2008-07-28 Thread Kristian 'kriss' Mueller
I've spent a great deal of time messing with WIFI also. Once I get some more experience with the OM platform, I might contribute to building a gui network manager. I really believe that a lot of the common system administration-type tasks - such as setting up WLAN, setting up GPRS

Re: wifi

2008-07-28 Thread Jay Vaughan
SettingsGUI still has to be ported to GTA02 and the FSO image. This is what I'll be doing here during the next days. I'll be very happy to test on GTA02 and GTA01 concurrently, and help out any way I can. I think SettingsGUI could make a lot of mundane OM tasks a lot more pleasant, frankly

Re: wifi

2008-07-22 Thread Dietmar Friede
On Sunday 20 July 2008, Charles Hill wrote: After two days of fighting with WPA2-PSK and getting nowhere, I figured something out. My WAP doesn't broadcast the SSID. Normally, this isn't a problem as I specify the SSID in the wpa_supplicant.conf file. But when I turned ON broadcast of

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread Jay Vaughan
I've spent a great deal of time messing with WIFI also. Once I get some more experience with the OM platform, I might contribute to building a gui network manager. One thing that really needs to be clear among us all right now is that there are those who have hacked things together to

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread julien cubizolles
Le mercredi 16 juillet 2008 à 20:03 +0200, julien cubizolles a écrit : But it was just once, when I got the Freerunner. Now, after several opkg upgrades (don't know if it's related thoug), I can't get it to get a lease anymore. It's working again ! Here are my settings :

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread Bumbl
I do get nameresolution only sometimes although resolv.conf lists the correct nameserver. You have to try a few ifup eth0 and ifdown eth0 and it has proven helpful to run commands more than once (e.g. ping www.openmoko.org 2-3 times after each other) Bastian Feder wrote: Hi, I also managed

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread Bumbl
For me udhcpc only fails the first time it is run to get the correct data If you run it immediatly after the first try it succeeds. Tommi Kärkkäinen wrote: Stephen Shelton kirjoitti: Most specifically, I keep getting messages such as ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT] which would lead me to believe

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread Tommi Kärkkäinen
Indeed it does. I started thinking if there was something like that late last night, but wasn't sure if it's replicable. It seems it is now. Thanks for the info. Bumbl kirjoitti: For me udhcpc only fails the first time it is run to get the correct data If you run it immediatly after the first

Re: wifi

2008-07-17 Thread Mikael Berthe
* Tommi Kärkkäinen [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2008-07-16 19:21 +0200]: It seems random when I can connect and when I can't. It seems DHCP occasionally fails to give the config. At times, however, I am able to connect and use the wifi, and even then I am getting the ioctl message. Maybe udhcpc

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Matthew Lane
Stephen Shelton wrote: I've been beating my head against the wall trying to get my FR to connect to any secured wireless AP. It has no trouble connecting if there is no encryption, but I've had no luck otherwise. If anyone has had a better experience than me, perhaps you could take a look

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Tommi Kärkkäinen
Stephen Shelton kirjoitti: Most specifically, I keep getting messages such as ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT] which would lead me to believe the kernel is unhappy... Even more specifically, is the message ioctl[SIOCSIWENCODEEXT]: Operation not supported? I get that too, but it doesn't prevent me from

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Christophe Badoit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Stephen Shelton a écrit : I've been beating my head against the wall trying to get my FR to connect to any secured wireless AP. It has no trouble connecting if there is no encryption, but I've had no luck otherwise. If anyone has had a

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread julien cubizolles
Le mercredi 16 juillet 2008 à 11:56 -0500, Stephen Shelton a écrit : I've been beating my head against the wall trying to get my FR to connect to any secured wireless AP. It has no trouble connecting if there is no encryption, but I've had no luck otherwise. If anyone has had a better

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Bastian Feder
Hey Julian, I had the same problem and fixed this by adding : up echo nameserver [IPofYourRouter] /etc/resolv.conf to the eth0 section of your /etcnetwork/interfaces - file. hope that helps Bastian On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 8:03 PM, julien cubizolles [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Le mercredi 16

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Stephen Shelton
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:36:29PM +0200, Christophe Badoit wrote: For WEP, I'm currently connecting with : ifconfig eth0 up iwconfig eth0 essid any iwconfig eth0 key 'mykey' iwconfig eth0 essid 'myssid' ifup eth0 Something strange, I am unable to set the key (iwconfig key) if the

Re: wifi

2008-07-16 Thread Russell Sears
Stephen Shelton wrote: On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 07:36:29PM +0200, Christophe Badoit wrote: For WEP, I'm currently connecting with : ifconfig eth0 up iwconfig eth0 essid any iwconfig eth0 key 'mykey' iwconfig eth0 essid 'myssid' ifup eth0 Something strange, I am unable to set the key

Re: WiFi chip squeezes 802.11n into MicroSD cards

2008-01-10 Thread Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller
Am 10.01.2008 um 21:29 schrieb Michael Shiloh: Yeah, cool. Can you toss this up on the wiki in the appropriate section? If someone can help me to tell what the appropriate section is... Dr. H. Nikolaus Schaller wrote: Something interesting - could be good to see in GTA03:

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-25 Thread Bartlomiej Zdanowski AutoGuard Ltd.
Hi. Giles, your criticism is constructive and good so it leads to better device development. But there are some points that I don't agree. Giles Jones pisze: Port layout seemingly done at random, poor layout. USB/power connector better at bottom of device. No chance since there are

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-25 Thread Ian Stirling
Bartlomiej Zdanowski AutoGuard Ltd. wrote: Hi. Giles, your criticism is constructive and good so it leads to better device development. But there are some points that I don't agree. Giles Jones pisze: Port layout seemingly done at random, poor layout. USB/power connector better at bottom of

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-25 Thread Jeff Andros
On 8/25/07, Bartlomiej Zdanowski AutoGuard Ltd. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Memory card under the SIM card (why? there's seemingly loads of space). If there would be USB2 there will be no need to remove SD card much often. But still SD will be removed more often that SIM card, so maybe it

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-24 Thread Tim Shannon
I don't know about you guys, but personally I'd rather have the electromagnetic radiation traveling under my chin, then through my brain, but maybe brain cancer doesn't scare you as much. On 8/24/07, Eric Johnson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Giles Jones wrote: GSM antenna is at bottom of phone,

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-24 Thread AVee
On Friday 24 August 2007 15:18, Tim Shannon wrote: I don't know about you guys, but personally I'd rather have the electromagnetic radiation traveling under my chin, then through my brain, but maybe brain cancer doesn't scare you as much. Braincancer may scare me, high frequency radio waves do

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-24 Thread Tim Shannon
It was actually a joke. If cell frequencies caused cancer, everyone would be dead by now, because there are a lot worse stuff floating in the air. On 8/24/07, AVee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Friday 24 August 2007 15:18, Tim Shannon wrote: I don't know about you guys, but personally I'd

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-23 Thread Eric Johnson
Giles Jones wrote: GSM antenna is at bottom of phone, should be at top of phone. I thought the idea of having the antenna at the bottom was so that the signal isn't attenuated by your head so much during a call. [At least someone told me that was a good thing on the RAZRs and it sounded

Re: WiFi vs. speaker

2007-08-22 Thread Giles Jones
Mark Haury [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote : C'mon, guys, do you _really_ need that big hole right through the case? Why don't you keep the stereo speakers and put the WiFi in that wasted space instead The GSM antenna is next to the hole, not the best place for a wifi module. I do agree with

Re: Wifi (was Re: community Digest, Vol 15, Issue 1)

2007-02-19 Thread Marcin Juszkiewicz
Dnia poniedziałek, 19 lutego 2007, Martin Lefkowitz napisał: Date: Mon, 19 Feb 2007 07:58:04 +0100 From: Marcin Juszkiewicz [EMAIL PROTECTED] Marvel 8385 can be connected to SDIO, CF, SPI and it is one of chips you are talking about. Yes, and it looks like there is at least a project

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-18 Thread Mikko Rauhala
la, 2007-02-17 kello 19:29 -0800, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht kirjoitti: This has been discussed many, many times in the last month. According to Sean, no wifi chips that both are low-power and have open specs. It sounds like the GPS and GSM chips aren't open spec either. That didn't stop them

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread Alessandro Iurlano
On 2/16/07, Esra Kummer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: So the Wifi will not be integrated in the first Neo 1973, but is there a chance for a hardware addon? Has someone some information about that? Cheers Esra Neo1973 will have a USB interface capable of connecting to a WiFi adapter. But you will

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread Martin Lefkowitz
It would be more of a mistake to have the device delayed for developers for another 3-6 months because they can't get the system to work because it's too complicated with two different types of microwave coming into the same device. My suspicion is that you would be complaining about that too,

RE: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread David Schlesinger
This is a BIG hardware design mistake IMHO. I think you should go right out and build your _own_ phone. Tell us all about it when you get done. ___ OpenMoko community mailing list community@lists.openmoko.org

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread Oleg Gusev
Am Samstag, 17. Februar 2007 12:24 schrieb t3st3r: P.S. As for me, I'm still do not understand, why there is no WI-FI built in. This is a BIG hardware design mistake IMHO. It does not make sense to complain here about the (missing) hardware features. If you urgently need wifi in a phone

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread t3st3r
David Schlesinger wrote: This is a BIG hardware design mistake IMHO. I think you should go right out and build your _own_ phone. Tell us all about it when you get done. Kinda strange reply. I have to admit your reply is completely useless and even looks like an insult. Next time please

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread t3st3r
Joe Pfeiffer wrote: Another, probably better, option is a bluetooth access point. Yes but it will have insignificant coverage. So it will be hardly limited to my home. Still something and better than nothing. P.S. As for me, I'm still do not understand, why there is no WI-FI built in.

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread t3st3r
Oleg Gusev wrote: Am Samstag, 17. Februar 2007 12:24 schrieb t3st3r: P.S. As for me, I'm still do not understand, why there is no WI-FI built in. This is a BIG hardware design mistake IMHO. It does not make sense to complain here about the (missing) hardware features. Okay,

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread Oleg Gusev
Am Samstag, 17. Februar 2007 23:57 schrieb t3st3r: hacking linux to HTC and getting wi-fi to work is not impossible ... The screenshots id=88 and id=89 at http://scap.linuxtogo.org/index.php?page=3 are showing openmoko running on HTC Universal. WiFi is disabled because (guess(!)) openmoko

Re: Wifi again

2007-02-17 Thread ryan lerch
I have added a bit more information to the wiki about the exclusion of wifi. i have tried to summarise the information that was discussed in this thread. Please have a read and edit at will :P hopefully, with this documented in the wiki, if this discussion comes up again, we can point the

  1   2   >