[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Sun, 2007-02-04 at 12:13 -0800, Keith Packard wrote: On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread Keith Packard
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently working best for me. Thanks for getting started on this; I

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread Daniel Stone
On Thu, Feb 01, 2007 at 06:26:13PM -0500, David Reveman wrote: I spent some time this week trying to add support for input transformations to the server. I tried a few different approaches. The patches I've attached are what's currently working best for me. Hi David, This looks largely fine to

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort of window transformations are you aiming to support 3D perspective affine transformations? What sort of 3D objects will the windows be mapped onto? There are a

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 23:56 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote: Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 16:10 -0500, David Reveman a écrit : On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort of window transformations are you

[compiz] Re: input transformations

2007-02-05 Thread David Reveman
On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 15:22 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: Xavier Bestel wrote: Le lundi 05 février 2007 à 16:10 -0500, David Reveman a écrit : On Mon, 2007-02-05 at 11:11 -0800, Deron Johnson wrote: It's hard for me to evaluate this without some higher level context. What sort