On Wed, 2007-02-28 at 19:04 +0200, Daniel Stone wrote:
On Wed, Feb 28, 2007 at 11:07:15AM +, Felix Bellaby wrote:
The argument against placing input transformation within the compositor
is founded on the assumption that it introduces an unnecessary round
trip into the process
On Thu, 2007-02-01 at 18:26 -0500, David Reveman wrote:
It seems to me like we need to experiment a bit before we can decide
what's the best solution. My current patches are at least something to
start with and I look forward to discussing it more next week at
xdevconf.
The compositor
On Thu, 2006-07-20 at 13:57 -0400, Kristian Høgsberg wrote:
On 7/20/06, Felix Bellaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think that I may have found a potentially useful way out of some
problems within the current compositing framework. Basically, the server
has information that the compositor
I think that I may have found a potentially useful way out of some
problems within the current compositing framework. Basically, the server
has information that the compositor would find useful.
Of course, I may be wrong ...
GLX redirection
---
The GLX protocol provides GL
