[compiz] 1.)Embedded Compiz on GoForce! 2.) Developer Challenge, $5, 000 for grabs
youTube video: http://youtube.com/watch?v=8kLFPfaxQ6U does anyone know what tools were used to make this and is Linux behind it? ... / anyone have experience with Qtopia? .../ as it seems to me, Qtopia Core (Qt/X11) might be good tool to do this... / there is even support for OpenGL ES Since they have Developer Challenge and $5,000 for grabs, i thought making Compiz with it would be nice little project and you might be the right bunch to go for it... http://www.trolltech.com/developer/tt/gpdevchallenge -Qtopia Open Source Downloads- http://www.trolltech.com/developer/downloads/qtopia/qtopia-gpl cheers, zelko Miniature, Linux based OpenGL development system without X http://one.xthost.info/zelko/opengl.html ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] adding XCB dependency
On Apr 27, 07 18:13:57 +0200, Danny Baumann wrote: Just for curiousity - which distros do actually ship XCB at the moment, at least as some sort of extra/unofficial package? I couldn't find one openSUSE 10.3 will ship XCB, and use libX11 over XCB. So it's mandatory. We still hit quite a number of applications with that infamous locking bug. The most important ones are the java implementations (almost all of them). CU Matthias -- Matthias Hopf [EMAIL PROTECTED] ____ __ Maxfeldstr. 5 / 90409 Nuernberg (_ | | (_ |__ [EMAIL PROTECTED] Phone +49-911-74053-715 __) |_| __) |__ R D www.mshopf.de ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
Re: [compiz] [PATCH] Option for activation behaviour on window close
On Thu, 2007-05-03 at 14:51 +0200, Danny Baumann wrote: Hi, please find attached a patch that makes the behaviour of window activation when a window is closed optional. Currently, always the last active window is activated. Sometimes this might not be the desired behaviour, but users (like me ;-) ) would like the window under the pointer to be activated. This patch adds the latter behaviour as an option while still keeping the former behaviour as default. Questions / concerns / objections / opinions anyone? Is there any reason someone using click-to-focus would want this? Is there any reason someone not using click-to-focus wouldn't want this? From my point of view: Two times no. Alyone got a different opinion? David, so you are fine with adding this code, but not making it depend on its own option, but on the click_to_focus option? Yes, let's add this as part of the click_to_focus option and we'll improve it if someone complains. Please use the word Pointer instead of Mouse in the focusMouseTarget function name. - David ___ compiz mailing list compiz@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/compiz
