On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 17:01 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:04 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
> >> I don't really know enough about how all this works to comment on it, so
> >> are you saying that without the ALWAYS_INDIRECT workaround that
> >> applicat
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:04 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I don't really know enough about how all this works to comment on it, so
>> are you saying that without the ALWAYS_INDIRECT workaround that
>> applications other than compiz will be affected? Or is it that the patch
>
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 15:04 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> I don't really know enough about how all this works to comment on it, so
> are you saying that without the ALWAYS_INDIRECT workaround that
> applications other than compiz will be affected? Or is it that the patch
> will not work with *al
Michel Dänzer wrote:
> On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 13:29 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I was just struggling with the problem of starting compiz while having
>> to use LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT environment variable.
>>
>> In our packages we have a patch that means we do not need to set this
>> variable as i
On Wed, 2007-07-04 at 13:29 +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>
> I was just struggling with the problem of starting compiz while having
> to use LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT environment variable.
>
> In our packages we have a patch that means we do not need to set this
> variable as it searches also the glxS
Hi,
I was just struggling with the problem of starting compiz while having
to use LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT environment variable.
In our packages we have a patch that means we do not need to set this
variable as it searches also the glxServerExtensions.
This is not my patch but it is quite well know
